Re: Typographical errors

2009-01-28 Thread Marcos Caceres

Hi Rotan,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Rotan Hanrahan
 wrote:
> Version cited: WD 28 January 2009
>
> URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-widgets-20081222/
> Aware of latest editor's draft at: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/
>
> Minor observation in editor's draft: the text suggests that the Conformance
> Checker must warm the author if the icon does not conform to SVG Tiny.
> Perhaps the author is already warm enough, and should be warNed instead.

hehe, fixed.

> Cross-reference issue: The link to the requirement R20 (claiming to be
> "Iconic Representations") in section 1.2 of the draft (cited) should
> actually be a link to R19 (actually "Iconic Representation"). R20 is
> actually the "Configuration Parameters" requirement as the following link
> demonstrates:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-reqs/#r20.-x

Ah, the reason they don't line up is that these have been updated to
link to the unpublished draft of the requirements document.

> On this point, I suspect a review of all the R** numbers and links is
> advised. (Using descriptive anchors instead of number sequences would have
> avoided this lack of synchronization between the documents.)

Yeah, I think we will republish a bunch of these documents together so
they don't get out of sync.

> These observations are trivial, but I know that the editor will provide the
> corrections, and I thank the editor in advance for this.

Thank you for taking the time to send in those corrections!

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au



Typographical errors

2009-01-28 Thread Rotan Hanrahan
Version cited: WD 28 January 2009

URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-widgets-20081222/
Aware of latest editor's draft at: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/

Minor observation in editor's draft: the text suggests that the Conformance 
Checker must warm the author if the icon does not conform to SVG Tiny. Perhaps 
the author is already warm enough, and should be warNed instead.

Cross-reference issue: The link to the requirement R20 (claiming to be "Iconic 
Representations") in section 1.2 of the draft (cited) should actually be a link 
to R19 (actually "Iconic Representation"). R20 is actually the "Configuration 
Parameters" requirement as the following link demonstrates:
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-reqs/#r20.-

On this point, I suspect a review of all the R** numbers and links is advised. 
(Using descriptive anchors instead of number sequences would have avoided this 
lack of synchronization between the documents.)

These observations are trivial, but I know that the editor will provide the 
corrections, and I thank the editor in advance for this.

Regards,

---Rotan.




Rotan Hanrahan
Chief Innovations Architect
MobileAware