I'd like to get broader input on #3968 from comment: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3968#note-14 on.

I don't think this falls within the classic discussion of thin/fat models.  Mainly because the methods included in what is considered a /fat/ model by django are still confined within the concerns of the data model.  We already have a few /fat/ models such as RepositoryVersion.  What's being discussed for content-guards (and previously discussed for sync and publish) is different.


[1] https://django-best-practices.readthedocs.io/en/latest/applications.html#make-em-fat
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to