Re: [Pulp-list] Dependencies are broken after 2.8 release

[Michael Hrivnak]

I've been able to reproduce this problem with python-semantic-version. The
workaround is thankfully simple. After changing your repo file in
/etc/yum.repos.d/ to point at pulp 2.8, do this:

$ sudo yum remove python-semantic-version

This will remove a number of pulp packages also. That's ok. Then do:

$ sudo yum update
$ sudo yum groupinstall pulp-server-qpid


On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Konstantin M. Khankin <
khankin.konstan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> After Pulp 2,8 release dependencies got broken. This is what I see on Pulp
> server:
> file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/semantic_version/__init__.py from
> install of python-semantic_version-2.4.2-1.el7.noarch conflicts with file
> from package python-semantic-version-2.2.0-3.el7.noarch
> ...
> (I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318318 to
> address this)
>
> But also on consumers:
> Failed to build transaction: python-pulp-rpm-common-2.7.1-1.el7.noarch
> requires python-pulp-common = 2.7.1
> pulp-rpm-handlers-2.8.0-1.el7.noarch requires python-pulp-rpm-common =
> 2.8.0
>
> Could you please help?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Konstantin Khankin
>
> ___
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

[Pulp-list] Pulp 2.8.1 beta is available

[Sean Myers]

Pulp 2.8.1 has been published to the beta repositories:

https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp/beta/2.8/

The following Redmine (pulp.plan.io) issues have been addressed in this release:

  Pulp
1734The Pulp streamer logs a traceback when a ConnectionError 
occurs.
1764SELinux denial on Celery attempting to read resolv.conf
1737The checksum/checksum_type is not being included in the lazy 
catalog
1735Downloading the CentOS base repository fails with lazy and 
--verify-all
1776sync_complete response has changed

  Puppet Support
1607Puppet install distributor fails when deleting repository if 
not published

  RPM Support
1138Install applicable errata consumer task does not report kernel 
packages were updated
1366Advisory package list doesn't match packages in the repository
1548published errata contain packages not in repo
1789Sync fills up /var/cache/pulp/ with rpms

More details regarding these issues can be found in Redmine at the following 
URL:

http://bit.ly/1LHtwWp



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

Re: [Pulp-list] Version 2.8 bug 1749 and production usage of Pulp

[Brian Bouterse]

Vaclav,

That issue is likely due to data that is in your database that was
upgraded. A fresh install with no previously upgraded data won't have
this problem.

It may be useful to other users to have you run the data validation tool
on your upgraded data and report what it shows. Posting your findings
onto issue #1749, or a link via e-mail or in #pulp on IRC would be helpful.

Thanks,
Brian


On 03/23/2016 01:02 PM, Vaclav Adamec wrote:
> With completely fresh installation it is ok, simple upgrade from latest
> GA 2.7 to 2.8 + database update and restart didn't help. Data validation
> tool wasn't used, but I can try it (if it's valuable for you).
> 
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Brian Bouterse  > wrote:
> 
> Hi Vaclav,
> 
> The bug #1749 was fixed in the 2.8.0 Pulp release. What version of Pulp
> are you running? Also we don't support upgrading from one beta to
> another. Did you upgrade your system directly from a GA release to
> another GA release?
> 
> Did you run the pre-upgrade data validation tool[0]? What results did it
> show? That tool can help identify data quality issues which sounds like
> what you are experiencing. I believe you can run it post-upgrade too and
> still get information about your problem from it.
> 
> If you are running 2.8.0 and are still having issues, consider getting
> on #pulp on freenode and asking more in there.
> 
> [0]:
> 
> http://pulp.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user-guide/release-notes/2.8.x.html#before-upgrade
> 
> -Brian
> 
> On 03/21/2016 03:21 AM, Vaclav Adamec wrote:
> > Hi,
> >  I still hitting this bug https://pulp.plan.io/issues/1749 and
> unable to
> > use latest version. And seems that it's not critical for anybody else
> > than me :-)
> >
> > So I'm a quite curious is there anybody else who use Pulp for Centos6
> > consumers ? How many users really use Pulp ? is it stable enough
> to use
> > it for production systems ?
> >
> > Vasek
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Pulp-list mailing list
> > Pulp-list@redhat.com 
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
> >
> 
> ___
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list@redhat.com 
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- May the fox be with you ...
>/\
>   (~(
>) ) /\_/\
>   (_=---_(@ @)
> (  \   / 
> /|/\|\  V
> " " " "
> 
> 

___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

[Pulp-list] what can you do with pulp?

[Elizabeth Jones]

I'm still pretty new to pulp and I have been able to successfully sync repos, 
patch consumers, and use my pulp server as a repo for servers that aren't 
consumers.  Now trying to figure out what else I can do with it and was 
wondering if anyone could help me with:
1. Can pulp compare packages installed on different consumers and tell you how 
they differ?
2. Can pulp make two different consumers that have different packages and/or 
versions match?
3. Can you rollback updates to consumers using pulp?
4. Can you issue a reboot from pulp without including it on the update command 
line?
thanks,EJ___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

Re: [Pulp-list] Version 2.8 bug 1749 and production usage of Pulp

[Vaclav Adamec]

With completely fresh installation it is ok, simple upgrade from latest GA
2.7 to 2.8 + database update and restart didn't help. Data validation tool
wasn't used, but I can try it (if it's valuable for you).

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Brian Bouterse  wrote:

> Hi Vaclav,
>
> The bug #1749 was fixed in the 2.8.0 Pulp release. What version of Pulp
> are you running? Also we don't support upgrading from one beta to
> another. Did you upgrade your system directly from a GA release to
> another GA release?
>
> Did you run the pre-upgrade data validation tool[0]? What results did it
> show? That tool can help identify data quality issues which sounds like
> what you are experiencing. I believe you can run it post-upgrade too and
> still get information about your problem from it.
>
> If you are running 2.8.0 and are still having issues, consider getting
> on #pulp on freenode and asking more in there.
>
> [0]:
>
> http://pulp.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user-guide/release-notes/2.8.x.html#before-upgrade
>
> -Brian
>
> On 03/21/2016 03:21 AM, Vaclav Adamec wrote:
> > Hi,
> >  I still hitting this bug https://pulp.plan.io/issues/1749 and unable to
> > use latest version. And seems that it's not critical for anybody else
> > than me :-)
> >
> > So I'm a quite curious is there anybody else who use Pulp for Centos6
> > consumers ? How many users really use Pulp ? is it stable enough to use
> > it for production systems ?
> >
> > Vasek
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Pulp-list mailing list
> > Pulp-list@redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
> >
>
> ___
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>



-- 
-- May the fox be with you ...
   /\
  (~(
   ) ) /\_/\
  (_=---_(@ @)
(  \   /
/|/\|\  V
" " " "
___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp installation with different web server

[Jiri Tyr]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Dennis Kliban  wrote:
>
> This is a great idea! Have you successfully run Pulp with nginx?


I did not try to run Pulp with Nginx. But I would definitely prefer to use
Nginx if it would be available ;o)
___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp installation with different web server

[Dennis Kliban]

- Original Message -
> Hello,
> 
> I'm not sure if this topic was already discussed here but I would really
> appreciate if Pulp would be possible to install with a different web server
> than Apache - for example Nginx.
> 
> This would require to create extra packages containing only the Apache/Nginx
> config files and use the "provides:" and "requires:" options in the RPM SPEC
> file to satisfy the web server dependency.

This is a great idea! Have you successfully run Pulp with nginx? If so, it 
would be great if you could contribute your configuration in a pull request.

As for the packaging, we could add another package that would provide the 
default nginx configs. Then we could create a package group that contains that 
extra package. 

-Dennis

> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Best regards,
> Jiri
> 
> ___
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

[Pulp-list] Pulp installation with different web server

[Jiri Tyr]

Hello,

I'm not sure if this topic was already discussed here but I would really
appreciate if Pulp would be possible to install with a different web server
than Apache - for example Nginx.

This would require to create extra packages containing only the
Apache/Nginx config files and use the "provides:" and "requires:" options
in the RPM SPEC file to satisfy the web server dependency.

Any thoughts?

Best regards,
Jiri
___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list

Re: [Pulp-list] Version 2.8 bug 1749 and production usage of Pulp

[Brian Bouterse]

Hi Vaclav,

The bug #1749 was fixed in the 2.8.0 Pulp release. What version of Pulp
are you running? Also we don't support upgrading from one beta to
another. Did you upgrade your system directly from a GA release to
another GA release?

Did you run the pre-upgrade data validation tool[0]? What results did it
show? That tool can help identify data quality issues which sounds like
what you are experiencing. I believe you can run it post-upgrade too and
still get information about your problem from it.

If you are running 2.8.0 and are still having issues, consider getting
on #pulp on freenode and asking more in there.

[0]:
http://pulp.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user-guide/release-notes/2.8.x.html#before-upgrade

-Brian

On 03/21/2016 03:21 AM, Vaclav Adamec wrote:
> Hi,
>  I still hitting this bug https://pulp.plan.io/issues/1749 and unable to
> use latest version. And seems that it's not critical for anybody else
> than me :-) 
> 
> So I'm a quite curious is there anybody else who use Pulp for Centos6
> consumers ? How many users really use Pulp ? is it stable enough to use
> it for production systems ?
> 
> Vasek
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
> 

___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list