Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] svolume_orc.c: error: line 67: unknown directive: .longparam
Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2011, 11:56 +0530 schrieb Arun Raghavan: On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 00:06 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: [...] I guess it has something to do with commit 4cd90d9e32ca9a23e3c0f7615974ea0c55ff3e49 Author: Arun Raghavan arun.ragha...@collabora.co.uk Date: Mon Oct 25 17:59:08 2010 +0100 volume: Add Orc-based optimised volume scaling This adds volume scaling for 1- and 2-channel software volume scaling using Orc. While testing the MMX and SSE backends on a Core2, I see an ~2x performance benefit over the hand-rolled MMX and SSE code. Since I haven't been able to test on other architectures, the Orc code is only used when MMX/SSE* is present. This can be changed in the future after testing on AMD and ARM machines. but I do not know anything about this. I am using OpenEmbedded with `minimal` or `minimal-uclibc` for `MACHINE = at91sam9260ek`. ORCC 0.4.9 is used on this system. Could you try with Orc 0.4.10? Unfortunately, I don't have a quick way to downgrade my local Orc version to verify? I verified that it works with Orc 0.4.10. If this is not possible, we can just bump the patch to 0.4.11, which was released a while ago (and is what I'm using). You send the patch today and it was already pushed in f49711c9 [1]. BTW, for 0.9.22 and current stable-queue, the Orc stuff will not get used for anything on ARM. Understood. Thanks, Paul [1] http://git.0pointer.de/?p=pulseaudio.git;a=commit;h=f49711c99a86075de0a2337c4ea71049a9aa146a signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] svolume_orc.c: error: line 67: unknown directive: .longparam
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 12:21 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: [...] I verified that it works with Orc 0.4.10. I went with 0.4.11 because I had some vague recollection of hitting a bug in 0.4.10 and didn't want to take a chance. Cheers, Arun ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] svolume_orc.c: error: line 67: unknown directive: .longparam
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 00:06 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: Dear PulseAudio folks, [...] I guess it has something to do with commit 4cd90d9e32ca9a23e3c0f7615974ea0c55ff3e49 Author: Arun Raghavan arun.ragha...@collabora.co.uk Date: Mon Oct 25 17:59:08 2010 +0100 volume: Add Orc-based optimised volume scaling This adds volume scaling for 1- and 2-channel software volume scaling using Orc. While testing the MMX and SSE backends on a Core2, I see an ~2x performance benefit over the hand-rolled MMX and SSE code. Since I haven't been able to test on other architectures, the Orc code is only used when MMX/SSE* is present. This can be changed in the future after testing on AMD and ARM machines. but I do not know anything about this. I am using OpenEmbedded with `minimal` or `minimal-uclibc` for `MACHINE = at91sam9260ek`. ORCC 0.4.9 is used on this system. Could you try with Orc 0.4.10? Unfortunately, I don't have a quick way to downgrade my local Orc version to verify? If this is not possible, we can just bump the patch to 0.4.11, which was released a while ago (and is what I'm using). BTW, for 0.9.22 and current stable-queue, the Orc stuff will not get used for anything on ARM. Cheers, Arun ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
