[Puppet - Bug #16871] gem package provider should reset permissions

2013-12-02 Thread tickets

Issue #16871 has been updated by Rodney Beede.


Setting the umask may not be the answer versus some kind of chmod option or 
feature?


Bug #16871: gem package provider should reset permissions
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/16871#change-100293

* Author: Tails developers
* Status: Re-opened
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: provider
* Target version: 
* Affected Puppet version: 
* Keywords: 
* Branch: 

If the user running `puppet apply` uses a restrictive umask (e.g. 0077), gems 
installed using the gem package provider will be unreadable for all users 
except root.

rubygems author has [ruled this behaviour as a 
feature](https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/272), but in Puppet 
context I fail to see a reason why the gem package provider should behave 
differently than, for example, apt.




-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[Puppet - Bug #16871] gem package provider should reset permissions

2013-05-21 Thread tickets

Issue #16871 has been updated by Joseph Mulloy.


Can there be a parameter to set a particular umask? Without the ability to 
override the umask the gems provider is practically useless. This makes it very 
difficult for me to use Puppet to bootstrap the install of the master since 
gems installs with a restrictive umask, which is ridiculous for a system wide 
gem install. We need a solution.


Bug #16871: gem package provider should reset permissions
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/16871#change-91322

* Author: Tails developers
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: provider
* Target version: 
* Affected Puppet version: 
* Keywords: 
* Branch: 

If the user running `puppet apply` uses a restrictive umask (e.g. 0077), gems 
installed using the gem package provider will be unreadable for all users 
except root.

rubygems author has [ruled this behaviour as a 
feature](https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/272), but in Puppet 
context I fail to see a reason why the gem package provider should behave 
differently than, for example, apt.




-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




[Puppet - Bug #16871] gem package provider should reset permissions

2012-10-20 Thread tickets

Issue #16871 has been updated by Tails developers.


I beg you to reconsider. Do you realize that it means that in order to 
guarantee a coherent behaviour for all systems (= not depending on the default 
system umask), *every* Puppet module using the gem provider will have to 
include something like:

exec{'gitbot_fix_gem_perms':
  command => 'chmod -R go+rX /var/lib/gems',
  refreshonly => true,
  subscribe => Package['gitbot'],
}

And this does not contain the logic to get a clue about where is the right 
location for `/var/lib/gems` on the target system.

Bug #16871: gem package provider should reset permissions
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/16871#change-74532

Author: Tails developers
Status: Rejected
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: provider
Target version: 
Affected Puppet version: 
Keywords: 
Branch: 


If the user running `puppet apply` uses a restrictive umask (e.g. 0077), gems 
installed using the gem package provider will be unreadable for all users 
except root.

rubygems author has [ruled this behaviour as a 
feature](https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/272), but in Puppet 
context I fail to see a reason why the gem package provider should behave 
differently than, for example, apt.




-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.