Re: [Puppet Users] Augeas problem changing values in postfix/main.cf

2010-06-18 Thread Patrick Mohr

On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:04 AM, John Martin wrote:

 I have done some further experimenting and found things even more perplexing. 
  The rule is now just adding the new values that I need.  The rule is:
 
 augeas { dkim-postfix-settings:
 require = Package[postfix],
 context = /files/etc/postfix/main.cf,
 changes = [
 set smtpd_milters inet:localhost:20209,
 set non_smtpd_milters inet:localhost:20209,
 ins #comment before smtpd_milters,
 set #comment[.=''] 'Settings for implementation of 
 DKIM',
 ],
 onlyif = match smtpd_milters size == 0
 }

This mostly looks fine to me.  The solution to the problem is lower down.  
Here's some unasked for advice that has almost nothing to do with the problem.  
I would break this up into two statements like this:

augeas { first:
require = ...,
context = ...,
changes = [
set smtpd_milters inet:localhost:20209,
set non_smtpd_milters inet:localhost:20209,
]
#No onlyif
}

augeas { second:
require = Augeas[first],
context = ...,
changes = [
ins #comment before smtpd_milters,
set #comment[.=''] 'Settings for implementation of DKIM',
]
onlyif = #Test if comment exists
}

This means that if the settings change in value, augeas will set them back.

 When I run 'puppetd -t' on the client, sometimes it adds the lines into the 
 main.cf configuration file and on subsequent runs it removes it.  It is not 
 consistent.  I do not understand why it would remove the values.
 
 Also when I run puppetd with the --debug switch I see the following:
 
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): Opening augeas with 
 root /, lens path , flags 0
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): Augeas version 0.7.1 
 is installed
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): Will attempt to save 
 and only run if files changed
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): sending command 'set' 
 with params [/files/etc/postfix/main.cf/smtpd_milters, 
 inet:localhost:20209]
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): sending command 'set' 
 with params [/files/etc/postfix/main.cf/non_smtpd_milters, 
 inet:localhost:20209]
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): sending command 'ins' 
 with params [#comment, before, /files/etc/postfix/main.cf/smtpd_milters]
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): sending command 'set' 
 with params [/files/etc/postfix/main.cf/#comment[.=''], Settings for 
 implementation of DKIM]
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): Files changed, should 
 execute
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): Closed the augeas 
 connection
 debug: //dkim/Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings]: Changing returns
 debug: //dkim/Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings]: 1 change(s)
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): Opening augeas with 
 root /, lens path , flags 0
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): Augeas version 0.7.1 
 is installed
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): sending command 'set' 
 with params [/files/etc/postfix/main.cf/smtpd_milters, 
 inet:localhost:20209]
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): sending command 'set' 
 with params [/files/etc/postfix/main.cf/non_smtpd_milters, 
 inet:localhost:20209]
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): sending command 'ins' 
 with params [#comment, before, /files/etc/postfix/main.cf/smtpd_milters]
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): sending command 'set' 
 with params [/files/etc/postfix/main.cf/#comment[.=''], Settings for 
 implementation of DKIM]
 debug: Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings](provider=augeas): Closed the augeas 
 connection
 notice: //dkim/Augeas[dkim-postfix-settings]/returns: executed successfully
 
 I'm not sure why it is running the commands twice.  Please note when it does 
 the two sets of instructions it does add the contents to the main.cf file.  
 When it doesn't, it removes the contents.  Here is the output when puppet 
 removes the contents:
 
 debug: //liferay_system/File[/etc/postfix/main.cf]/content: Executing 'diff 
 -u /etc/postfix/main.cf /tmp/puppet-diffing.10996.0'
 --- /etc/postfix/main.cf2010-06-17 14:00:52.0 -0400
 +++ /tmp/puppet-diffing.10996.0 2010-06-17 14:01:15.0 -0400
 @@ -673,6 +673,3 @@
  smtp_sasl_security_options = noplaintext
  smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, 
 reject_unauth_destination
  mailbox_size_limit = 25600
 -# Settings for implementation of DKIM
 -smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
 -non_smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
 debug: 

Re: [Puppet Users] User Password

2010-06-18 Thread Mathieu Bornoz
Hi,

IMHO the best way will be to develop a small fact that indicates whether
it's a prod or non-prod environment and use it in the ressource to select
the right password :

user {my-user:
  ensure = present,
  password = $yourfact ? {
'prod' = 'production-password',
'non-prod' = 'non-production-password',
  },
  ...
}

Note that the fact used for the selection could be also the hostname of the
server or anything other that can determine if it's a prod or non-prod
environment.

Cheers,
Mathieu

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Marek Dohojda chro...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello

 Is there any way to have a user with two different passwords.

 I have a user that is present in our prod and non prod environments.
 However the password for non-prod is different than prod.  Anyway I can
 arrange that in puppet?
 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Puppet Users group.
 To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.compuppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Augeas problem changing values in postfix/main.cf

2010-06-18 Thread John Martin
Thanks Patrick!

I like the separation of the values being set and adding the comments.  That
makes complete sense.

As for the over-writing of the values, you were absolutely right.  The
main.cf was being managed by a different class that another Ops engineer had
implemented and I was unaware of.  I did away with Augeas after detecting
that.

Regards,

John

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] Re: Foreman / external_node.rb

2010-06-18 Thread CraftyTech
It looks like it's working now   This is what I get when I click
on yaml ...

---
parameters:
puppetmaster: puppet
classes: []

environment: 

It doesn't let me edit it thought... It seems to be static..

On Jun 17, 9:54 pm, Ohad Levy ohadl...@gmail.com wrote:
 that is not a limitation, and usually actually works  :)

 can you check that you get the right output with curl/wget - e.g.?

 curl  -khttps://foreman/node/fqdn?format=yml(add -x  to disable curl
 using a proxy)

 Ohad

 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:28 AM, CraftyTech hmmed...@gmail.com wrote:
  Well I got foreman.rb to work with https.  Look at this thread:

 http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/1d2b...

  I'd like to know what the deal is with node.rb I hope I'm doing
  something wrong, and that this is not a limitation.. :)

  On Jun 17, 9:06 pm, Mohamed Lrhazi lrh...@gmail.com wrote:
   I think I have the same problem the scripts bundled with foreman,
   those that talk to the web interface, do not seem to support https...
   I set up an apache virtual on localhost with ssl disabled and
   configured these scripts to speak to that. that seems to do it.

   Can someone confirm this limitation or are these scripts supposed to
   work with both http and https.
   The scripts am referring to are: node.rb, push_facts.rb and foreman.rb
  (reports)

   Thanks a lot.
   Mohamed.

   On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:44 AM, CraftyTech hmmed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ohad,

   I started it with webrick on port 80, and it appears to work.
This what I get when I run the command /etc/puppet/external_node.rb
host:

---
parameters:
 puppetmaster: puppet
classes: []

environment: 

Does that mean it works on webrick but not on apache/passenger:443?

On Jun 17, 11:00 am, Ohad Levy ohadl...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to be on the safe side, does it work if you use it with http
  (instead
of https)?
additionally, you should be using it with fqdn as the parameter (e.g.
/etc/puppet/external_node.rb fqdn )

Ohad

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:48 PM, CraftyTech hmmed...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 Hello All,

     I'm trying to start using external nodes under foreman, and I'm
 running into some issues.  I have the entries in puppet.conf:

    [main]
    external_nodes = /etc/puppet/external_node.rb
    node_terminus = exec

     The enternal_node.rb script is the one that came with foreman:

 #!/usr/bin/ruby
 # a simple script which fetches external nodes from Foreman
 # you can basically use anything that knows how to get http data,
  e.g.
 wget/curl etc.

 # Foreman url
 foreman_url=https://hostname:443;

 require 'net/http'

 foreman_url += /node/#{ARGV[0]}?format=yml
 url = URI.parse(foreman_url)
 req = Net::HTTP::Get.new(foreman_url)
 res = Net::HTTP.start(url.host, url.port) { |http|
  http.request(req)
 }

 case res
 when Net::HTTPOK
  puts res.body
 else
  $stderr.puts Error retrieving node %s: %s % [ARGV[0], res.class]
 end

  ##

 When I run it against a node, which I already took off the internal
 node definitions, I get the following error:

 /etc/puppet/external_node.rb hostname
 /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:2022:in `read_status_line': wrong
  status
 line: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
 \ (Net::HTTPBadResponse)
        from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:2009:in `read_new'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:1050:in `request'
        from /etc/puppet/external_node.rb:14
        from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:543:in `start'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/http.rb:440:in `start'
        from /etc/puppet/external_node.rb:13

 I went over the documentation meticulously before posting, but
 obviously I'm still missing something.  Can anyone shed some light
  on
 this?

 Thanks,

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups
 Puppet Users group.
 To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.compuppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  puppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.compuppet-users%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com

 .
 For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.compuppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  .
For more options, visit this group athttp://
  groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

   --
  

Re: [Puppet Users] Could not find class, code-blind

2010-06-18 Thread Tore Lønøy
Darn it. now I see the typo. I looked at your comment for 5 mins before i
noticed. Oh well :) Thanks alot!

On 17 June 2010 19:55, Gabriel Filion lelu...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 2010-06-17 06:31, Tore wrote:
  I'm troubled with a node-definition not able to resolve a class:
   Could not find class rhnsd::common at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp:
  8 on node X
 
  Content of manifest/site.pp:
  import nodes.pp
  [...]
 
  The layout of modules/rhnsd/ is:
  |-- files
  |   `-- up2date-rhn
  |-- manifests
  |   |-- client.pp
  |   |-- common.pp
  |   |-- init.pp
  |   `-- rhn.pp
 
  A `cat' from each manifest file:
  client.pp::
  class rhnds::client inherits rhnsd::common {
 
  service { rhnsd:
  ensure  = running,
  enable  = true,
  hasrestart  = true,
  hasstatus   = true,
  require = [ Package[rhnsd], File[/etc/
  sysconfig/rhn/up2date] ],
  subscribe   = File[/etc/sysconfig/rhn/up2date],
  }
 
  }
 
  common.pp::
  class rhnds::common inherits rhnsd {
  ^--

 If you really pasted this, then here is your error ;)

 I saw the same typo in client.pp higher up.

 
  if ($operatingsystem != 'RedHat') {
  fail(${fqdn} is not an RedHat OS, it is $
  {operatingsystem}. Unable to apply module RHN, since it is only used
  on RedHat based systems)
  }
 
  if ($lsbmajdistrelease != '5') {
  fail(${fqdn} is not a 5-major release from RedHat.
  Puppet modules for other major releases have not been made yet.)
  }
 
  $rhn_client_requirements = $lsbmajdistrelease ? {
  5 = [ 'yum', 'rhn_register', 'rhnsd' ],
  4 = [ 'yum', 'up2date', 'rhnsd' ],
  }
 
  package { $rhn_client_requirements:
  ensure  = present,
  }
 
  }
 
  init.pp::
  class rhnsd {
 
  }
 
 
  client.pp::
  class rhnsd::client::rhn inherits rhnsd::client {
 
  file { /etc/sysconfig/rhn/up2date:
  ensure  = present,
  source  = puppet:///rhn/up2date-rhn,
  require = File[/usr/share/rhn/RHNS-CA-CERT],
  }
 
  file { /usr/share/rhn/RHNS-CA-CERT-VISMA:
  ensure  = present,
  source  = puppet:///rhn/RHNS-CA-CERT,
  }
 
  }
 
 
  Why wont this work, I know it must be an small error, but right now im
  code-blind, it sucks.
 
  Thanks for your help
 


 --
 Gabriel Filion


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Composed custom facts, request for opinions and ideas (somewhat related to setting up puppet)

2010-06-18 Thread Silviu Paragina

On 17.06.2010 14:30, David Schmitt wrote:

On 6/17/2010 1:02 PM, Silviu Paragina wrote:

On 17.06.2010 10:53, David Schmitt wrote:

On 6/16/2010 8:27 PM, Silviu Paragina wrote:

This is somewhat related to an older thread. The topic was how to
install some perquisite packages for puppet, like augeas, lsb-release,
cron to name just a few. Puppet is required to reinstall this packages
if they are accidentally uninstalled. Because of the nature of this
packages some puppet code should not run in this state.

/For example/ if lsb-release isn't installed, and clients are both
ubuntu and debian, the apt package shouldn't setup sources as it might
end up switching the distro. (if lsb-release isn't installed facter 
can

not distinguish debian from ubuntu)
Augeas resources if are included in the run end up failing the run, 
thus

not allowing augeas to be installed.


The following case will fail, is lsb-release is not installed:

case $lsbdistcodename {
lenny: {...}
lucid: {...}
}

Wouldn't that be enough?

Best Regards, David

Interesting ideea. That should actually do for lsb-release, but how
about for augeas/cron. (I have a similar fact for augeas)
My ideea was to disable any sensitive puppet code in case of some sanity
checks failing.


The types should fail if no provider can be found. This in turn should 
fail all depending resources (e.g. require = Augeas[...] ). Can you 
provide a specific example?



Best Regards, David

I've been left with the impression that if augeas fails for provider 
reasons it fails the whole run.


My test case would imply the same thing.

sil...@puppet-test:/etc/puppet/repo/development/modules/puppet$ cat test.pp
augeas
{ puppet settings:
context = /files/etc/puppet/puppet.conf,
changes = [  set main/report true,
set main/server puppet.paragina.ro,],
}


exec
{ /test.sh:
}
sil...@puppet-test:/etc/puppet/repo/development/modules/puppet$ cat /test.sh
#!/bin/sh

date  /touchme
exit 1
sil...@puppet-test:/etc/puppet/repo/development/modules/puppet$ sudo 
puppet test.pp \


warning: Could not retrieve fact fqdn
Could not find a default provider for augeas
sil...@puppet-test:/etc/puppet/repo/development/modules/puppet$ ls /touchme
ls: cannot access /touchme: No such file or directory

There is no dependency between them yet the exec resource wasn't 
applied. If I remember right, the issue with this was that the run 
failed without installing augeas and the machine would be left in a ever 
failing state.



Silviu




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Composed custom facts, request for opinions and ideas (somewhat related to setting up puppet)

2010-06-18 Thread Robert Scheer
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 21:27 +0300, Silviu Paragina wrote:

 So are there any better ideeas?

Not a better idea, just another idea:

We simply repackaged facter with lsb-release as extra dependency. As we
already have our own package repository to install software released by
our developers, this hardly cost any effort.


Regards,

Robert Scheer
XS4ALL System Administration

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Composed custom facts, request for opinions and ideas (somewhat related to setting up puppet)

2010-06-18 Thread R.I.Pienaar

- Silviu Paragina sil...@paragina.ro wrote:


 
 I've been left with the impression that if augeas fails for provider 
 reasons it fails the whole run.
 
 My test case would imply the same thing.
 
 sil...@puppet-test:/etc/puppet/repo/development/modules/puppet$ cat
 test.pp
 augeas
 { puppet settings:
  context = /files/etc/puppet/puppet.conf,
  changes = [  set main/report true,
  set main/server puppet.paragina.ro,],
 }
 
 
 exec
 { /test.sh:
 }
 sil...@puppet-test:/etc/puppet/repo/development/modules/puppet$ cat
 /test.sh
 #!/bin/sh
 
 date  /touchme
 exit 1
 sil...@puppet-test:/etc/puppet/repo/development/modules/puppet$ sudo 
 puppet test.pp \
  
 warning: Could not retrieve fact fqdn
 Could not find a default provider for augeas
 sil...@puppet-test:/etc/puppet/repo/development/modules/puppet$ ls
 /touchme
 ls: cannot access /touchme: No such file or directory
 
 There is no dependency between them yet the exec resource wasn't 
 applied. If I remember right, the issue with this was that the run 
 failed without installing augeas and the machine would be left in a
 ever 
 failing state.
 

At puppetcamp Luke said the cron issue is a bug and if someone files it, 
they'll fix it.

You should be able to install package{cron:} in a run and later in the same 
run make crontabs if those resources require = Package[cron]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] Multiple environments and mail

2010-06-18 Thread Robert Scheer
To facilitate developing, testing and releasing puppet code, we use
different environments. That works very well. The only problem is that
I cannot prevent puppet from mailing a report, nor direct it somewhere
else, when using a different environment.

The file /etc/puppet/puppet.conf on the puppetmaster looks like this:
--
[main]
logdir=/var/log/puppet
vardir=/var/lib/puppet
ssldir=/etc/puppet/ssl
rundir=/var/run/puppet
factpath=$vardir/lib/facter
pluginsync=true
templatedir=$confdir/templates
color=false

[puppetmasterd]
autosign=false
verbose=true
reports=log,store,tagmail

[userxxx]
manifestdir=/usr/home/userxxx/svn/puppet/manifests
manifest=/usr/home/userxxx/svn/puppet/manifests/site.pp
modulepath = /usr/home/userxxx/svn/puppet/modules

[useryyy]
manifestdir=/usr/home/useryyy/svn/puppet/manifests
manifest=/usr/home/useryyy/svn/puppet/manifests/site.pp
modulepath=/usr/home/useryyy/svn/puppet/modules
--


The file /etc/puppet/tagmail.conf contains:
--
all:adm...@ourdomain
--


The line reports=log,store,tagmail under [puppetmasterd] is what we want
for production: if something changes, then adm...@ourdomain get a puppet
report. So far so good.

Now userxxx is has written a new module and is testing his code on a
node called testbox. He runs: puppetd --environment=userxxx --debug.
This generates a puppet report to adm...@ourdomain. But the admins do
not want to receive this report every time somebody else tests his/her
code. Of course every admin could filter away these mails, but that
is not a real solution.

Adding the option --report=false to puppetd has no effect.
Adding report=false to [userxxx] has no effect.
Adding reports=log to [userxxx] has no effect.
Adding tagmap=/usr/home/userxxx/svn/puppet/tagmail.conf to [userxxx] has
no effect. The new tagmap (with another address in it) is completely
ignored. Puppet still looks for /etc/puppet/tagmail.conf

Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong here?
We are using puppet 0.25.4 on both the master and client nodes.


Robert Scheer
XS4ALL System Administration

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] custom facts in legacy puppet 0.24.[89]

2010-06-18 Thread sHaggY_caT
Hi all!

How i may use in legacy puppet (0.24.[89]) custom facts in functions?
In new documentation not good faq about this:
http://docs.reductivelabs.com/guides/plugins_in_modules.html  this
documentation has information about new versions (25.5) and very old
(prior 0.24.4),
not about our 0.24.8  0.24.9 (we in migration now, we don'nt may
change version to 25.[0-9] in production now becouse compability)

Also i try http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Adding_Facts
my version of puppet don't know key of t  and, my puppet don't retrive
facts. I'm put facts in dir:
/module/plugins/facter
also, i have module mod_mysql, and put fact:
/path_to_modules_of_this_enviroment/mod_mysql/plugins/facter/mysql.rb
http://paste.org.ru/?0rs4fb but client does'nt see this fact

i add in config of this enviroment option of pluginsync
also, i try add this fact in dir: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/facter
manually.

Config of puppet enviroment and code of fact:

[r...@puppet2 facter]# cat /var/lib/puppet/modules/modules_development/
mod_mysql/plugins/facter/mysql.rb
Facter.add(mysql_exists) do
ENV[PATH]=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin

setcode do
mysqlexists = system which mysql  /dev/null 21
($?.exitstatus == 0)
end
end
[r...@puppet2 facter]#

[r...@puppet2 facter]# cat /etc/puppet/puppet.conf | grep -A4 \
[development
[development]
pluginsync = true
modulepath = /etc/puppet/projects:/var/lib/puppet/modules/
modules_development
manifest   = /etc/puppet/manifests/development_site.pp

[r...@puppet2 facter]#

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Multiple environments and mail

2010-06-18 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Robert Scheer r...@xs4all.net wrote:
 To facilitate developing, testing and releasing puppet code, we use
 different environments. That works very well. The only problem is that
 I cannot prevent puppet from mailing a report, nor direct it somewhere
 else, when using a different environment.

 The file /etc/puppet/puppet.conf on the puppetmaster looks like this:
 --
 [main]
 logdir=/var/log/puppet
 vardir=/var/lib/puppet
 ssldir=/etc/puppet/ssl
 rundir=/var/run/puppet
 factpath=$vardir/lib/facter
 pluginsync=true
 templatedir=$confdir/templates
 color=false

 [puppetmasterd]
 autosign=false
 verbose=true
 reports=log,store,tagmail

 [userxxx]
 manifestdir=/usr/home/userxxx/svn/puppet/manifests
 manifest=/usr/home/userxxx/svn/puppet/manifests/site.pp
 modulepath = /usr/home/userxxx/svn/puppet/modules

 [useryyy]
 manifestdir=/usr/home/useryyy/svn/puppet/manifests
 manifest=/usr/home/useryyy/svn/puppet/manifests/site.pp
 modulepath=/usr/home/useryyy/svn/puppet/modules
 --


 The file /etc/puppet/tagmail.conf contains:
 --
 all:    adm...@ourdomain
 --


 The line reports=log,store,tagmail under [puppetmasterd] is what we want
 for production: if something changes, then adm...@ourdomain get a puppet
 report. So far so good.

 Now userxxx is has written a new module and is testing his code on a
 node called testbox. He runs: puppetd --environment=userxxx --debug.
 This generates a puppet report to adm...@ourdomain. But the admins do
 not want to receive this report every time somebody else tests his/her
 code. Of course every admin could filter away these mails, but that
 is not a real solution.

 Adding the option --report=false to puppetd has no effect.

Have you tried --no-report ?

 Adding report=false to [userxxx] has no effect.
 Adding reports=log to [userxxx] has no effect.
 Adding tagmap=/usr/home/userxxx/svn/puppet/tagmail.conf to [userxxx] has
 no effect. The new tagmap (with another address in it) is completely
 ignored. Puppet still looks for /etc/puppet/tagmail.conf

 Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong here?
 We are using puppet 0.25.4 on both the master and client nodes.

This could be a bug, I don't use tagmail reports, but it just hit me
that it's probably reasonable for --test to imply --no-report as well
as the other things it implies.





 Robert Scheer
 XS4ALL System Administration

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Puppet Users group.
 To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.





-- 
nigel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Multiple environments and mail

2010-06-18 Thread Joe McDonagh

On 06/18/2010 02:18 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Robert Scheerr...@xs4all.net  wrote:
   

To facilitate developing, testing and releasing puppet code, we use
different environments. That works very well. The only problem is that
I cannot prevent puppet from mailing a report, nor direct it somewhere
else, when using a different environment.
 
Unfortunately, tagmail does not do per-environment settings. I put in a 
feature request for this a while ago, go thumbs it up!


--
Joe McDonagh
AIM: YoosingYoonickz
IRC: joe-mac on freenode
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] node inheritance for external nodes

2010-06-18 Thread Jon Choate
Is it possible to express node inheritance when using external nodes.  If it
is could someone post what the yaml might look like?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] passing variables to static files

2010-06-18 Thread CraftyTech
Hello All,

  I have quick question for you; How can I pass a variable to a
static file that I'm distributing via puppet?  i.g, :
class abc {
 file { /etc/abc.conf:
   ensure = present
   source = puppet:///sys/abc.conf}
  }


puppet:///sys/abc.conf contains :

   rundir= /central/$hostname/
   logdir= $hostname.log

Can this be done?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] passing variables to static files

2010-06-18 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:47 AM, CraftyTech hmmed...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello All,

      I have quick question for you; How can I pass a variable to a
 static file that I'm distributing via puppet?  i.g, :
 class abc {
     file { /etc/abc.conf:
           ensure = present
           source = puppet:///sys/abc.conf}
          }


    puppet:///sys/abc.conf contains :

   rundir= /central/$hostname/
   logdir= $hostname.log

 Can this be done?

You should probably look at using templates instead.

http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Puppet_Templating




 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Puppet Users group.
 To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.





-- 
nigel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] Re: passing variables to static files

2010-06-18 Thread CraftyTech
Yeah, that looks better.  Thanks.



On Jun 18, 2:49 pm, Nigel Kersten nig...@google.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:47 AM, CraftyTech hmmed...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello All,

       I have quick question for you; How can I pass a variable to a
  static file that I'm distributing via puppet?  i.g, :
  class abc {
      file { /etc/abc.conf:
            ensure = present
            source = puppet:///sys/abc.conf}
           }

     puppet:///sys/abc.conf contains :

    rundir= /central/$hostname/
    logdir= $hostname.log

  Can this be done?

 You should probably look at using templates instead.

 http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Puppet_Templating



  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  Puppet Users group.
  To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

 --
 nigel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] Get started with Puppet Development - the DeveloperBootstrap module

2010-06-18 Thread James Turnbull
Hi all

We've created a little module to help people interested in developing,
testing or working on the Puppet source:

http://forge.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs/DeveloperBootstrap

This module installs everything someone needs on Red Hat, Fedora,
CentOS, Debian, Ubuntu or Solaris in order to develop or test Puppet
source code.

After that all you need to do it check-out the source and hack away:

$ git clone git://github.com/reductivelabs/puppet.git

This is the initial release and I'd welcome any feedback or comments (or
bugs! :) ) via email either directly to me or to the
fo...@puppetlabs.com email address.

Thanks

James Turnbull

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppetmaster with stored configs leaks file descriptors on CentOS 5

2010-06-18 Thread Jason Koppe
I'm having the same issue on CentOS5.2 with the following packages:

*yum*
puppet-0.25.5-1.el5
puppet-server-0.25.5-1.el5
rubygems-1.3.1-1.el5
ruby-shadow-1.4.1-7.el5
ruby-devel-1.8.6.111-1
ruby-1.8.6.111-1
ruby-ri-1.8.6.111-1
ruby-docs-1.8.5-5.el5_3.7
ruby-augeas-0.3.0-1.el5
ruby-irb-1.8.6.111-1
ruby-rdoc-1.8.6.111-1
ruby-mode-1.8.5-5.el5_3.7
libselinux-ruby-1.33.4-5.5.el5
ruby-libs-1.8.6.111-1

*gem*
activerecord (2.3.8, 2.3.4)
activeresource (2.3.8)
activesupport (2.3.8, 2.3.4)
mysql (2.8.1)
rack (1.1.0)
rails (2.3.8)

Suggestions?


On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale 
arnaud.go...@ircam.fr wrote:

 Christopher chris...@pricegrabber.com writes:

  I ran into this same thing.  Update (rebuild) to the following rpms
  versions from fedora 11:
 
  rubygem-activerecord.noarch 1:2.3.2-4.fc11
  rubygem-activesupport.noarch1:2.3.2-2.fc11
  rubygem-rack.noarch 1.0.0-1.fc11

 Thanks, this fixed the issue.

 --
 Arnaud

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Puppet Users group.
 To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.compuppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.




-- 
Jason Koppe
jason.robert.ko...@gmail.com
Cell (210) 445-8242

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] passing variables to static files

2010-06-18 Thread spawn-puppet

As another option, I believe you can use:

  file { /etc/abc.conf:
ensure =  present
content =  rundir= /central/$hostname/\nlogdir= 
$hostname.log

   }

-  Jeff

On 06/18/2010 01:49 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:47 AM, CraftyTechhmmed...@gmail.com  wrote:

Hello All,

  I have quick question for you; How can I pass a variable to a
static file that I'm distributing via puppet?  i.g, :
class abc {
 file { /etc/abc.conf:
   ensure =  present
   source =  puppet:///sys/abc.conf}
  }


puppet:///sys/abc.conf contains :

   rundir= /central/$hostname/
   logdir= $hostname.log

Can this be done?


You should probably look at using templates instead.

http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Puppet_Templating





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.








--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.