On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:39 PM, R.I.Pienaar <r...@devco.net> wrote: > hello, > > ----- "Michael DeHaan" <mich...@reductivelabs.com> wrote: > >> >> Ohad, as you've said "I've written an application, which aims to >> solve all of the missing peaces around puppet". Obviously you've done a >> lot of work here, but I need to communicate something from a >> community perspective -- the proper place to fix missing pieces in Puppet is >> by >> contributing to Puppet -- our vision is to have no such "missing >> pieces". Hence things done outside of core tend to fragment the >> userbase and make things harder to install/use/manage/maintain. The >> future of this workflow tool is going to be Puppet's Dashboard. >> Where there are barriers to doing this, we will remove them. > > As a non affiliated community member who spend a lot of my time on Puppet I > think this is a particularly unfriendly and in fact alarming statement for > someone from RL to make.
Soliciting contributions of code for improvements to an open source project isn't what I'd classify as unfriendly and I'd expect RL people to take a leadership role when it comes to maintaining a solid foundation for the project. It is very difficult to infer tone from a mailing list posting, perhaps you've misread here? Or maybe I am but I'm willing to give Michael the benefit of the doubt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
