Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Lenny and lenny-backports

2010-11-10 Thread Zach Leslie
Which isn't terrible, but you loose init scripts and the like.

Zach


On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:43 PM, bobics  wrote:

> I get around this issue by installing Puppet as a gem.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] Re: Lenny and lenny-backports

2010-11-09 Thread bobics
I get around this issue by installing Puppet as a gem.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] Re: Lenny and lenny-backports

2010-11-05 Thread Walter Heck
Hi Richard,

On Nov 6, 12:59 am, Richard Crowley  wrote:
> You can't get around running an `apt-get update` but you can do that
> from an exec resource in an earlier run stage.
>
> stage { pre: before => Stage["main"] }
> exec { "apt-get update": stage => "pre" }
>
> You'll probably want to do your backports setup before the `apt-get
> update` in your early run stage, too.
Hmm, i haven't even seen that 'stage' type before, guess it's time to
hit the manual on that one :)

Walter

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



[Puppet Users] Re: Lenny and lenny-backports

2010-11-05 Thread Walter Heck
Hi Patrick,

On Nov 6, 1:25 am, Patrick  wrote:
> First, if you update puppet, it's probably a good idea to update facter.
I thought that would be done by dependencies? If not, yes that is also
what I need :)

> Second, are you trying to use lenny-backports for everything or just puppet 
> and related stuff?
I think 'the official debian way' is to only use backports for
packages that you choose, not for everything, right?

> Are you using apache for anything other than puppet?
Not yet, but I will be. It's going to be a setup used for shared
hosting, and I haven't found a more secure way to do that then apache
+ mod_fcgid

> Are you using ruby for more than just puppet?
Only on the puppetmaster, it will be running redmine.

cheers,

Walter

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.