Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Patryk Benderz
[cut]
 Maybe it is time to change the kernel from extremely old REDHAT 2.6 to
 Wheezy 3.2, at least to the one that do not use OpenVZ, like
 myself ?!?
I am looking forward to it. I am waiting for Debian kernel long enough.


-- 
Patryk LeadMan Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Fábio Rabelo
I´ve tryed 2.6.32-20, 2.6.32-21 and 2.6.32-22

all the same ...


Fábio Rabelo


2013/7/19 Patryk Benderz patryk.bend...@esp.pl

 [cut]
  Maybe it is time to change the kernel from extremely old REDHAT 2.6 to
  Wheezy 3.2, at least to the one that do not use OpenVZ, like
  myself ?!?
 I am looking forward to it. I am waiting for Debian kernel long enough.


 --
 Patryk LeadMan Benderz
 Linux Registered User #377521
 ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
 /\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

 ___
 pve-user mailing list
 pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
 http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread CoolCold
May be you are hitting the same issue -
http://wiki.hetzner.de/index.php?title=Installation_des_r8168-Treibers/enredirect=no
. This may be useful for you too -
http://mytechspam.livejournal.com/15630.html .

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Fábio Rabelo fa...@fabiorabelo.wiki.br wrote:
 I´ve tryed 2.6.32-20, 2.6.32-21 and 2.6.32-22

 all the same ...


 Fábio Rabelo


 2013/7/19 Patryk Benderz patryk.bend...@esp.pl

 [cut]
  Maybe it is time to change the kernel from extremely old REDHAT 2.6 to
  Wheezy 3.2, at least to the one that do not use OpenVZ, like
  myself ?!?
 I am looking forward to it. I am waiting for Debian kernel long enough.


 --
 Patryk LeadMan Benderz
 Linux Registered User #377521
 ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
 /\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

 ___
 pve-user mailing list
 pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
 http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user



 ___
 pve-user mailing list
 pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
 http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user




-- 
Best regards,
[COOLCOLD-RIPN]
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Fábio Rabelo
Thanks for the tip, i will try in the next opportunity .

For this system, I do not have time to wait, so I install Debian Squeeze,
then the debian backports kernel ( 3.2.0-4-amd64 ) and then PVE 2.3 over it
.

I have this solution running in another system, extremely stable ( over 4
months up and running ... )

PVE 3.0 do not allow this solution , pve-server conflicts with qemu-kvm (
witch I do not know why, qemu-kvm installs in different place, so are the
kvm kernel module !!! ) .

But my real question remains, why keep using 2.6 redhat old and dirty
kernel ?!?!?

Stock 3.2.0 Debian kernel works just fine with this ( and other so called
problematic ) cards, without any additional download nor compilation ...


Fábio Rabelo


2013/7/19 CoolCold coolthec...@gmail.com

 May be you are hitting the same issue -

 http://wiki.hetzner.de/index.php?title=Installation_des_r8168-Treibers/enredirect=no
 . This may be useful for you too -
 http://mytechspam.livejournal.com/15630.html .

 On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Fábio Rabelo fa...@fabiorabelo.wiki.br
 wrote:
  I´ve tryed 2.6.32-20, 2.6.32-21 and 2.6.32-22
 
  all the same ...
 
 
  Fábio Rabelo
 
 
  2013/7/19 Patryk Benderz patryk.bend...@esp.pl
 
  [cut]
   Maybe it is time to change the kernel from extremely old REDHAT 2.6 to
   Wheezy 3.2, at least to the one that do not use OpenVZ, like
   myself ?!?
  I am looking forward to it. I am waiting for Debian kernel long enough.
 
 
  --
  Patryk LeadMan Benderz
  Linux Registered User #377521
  ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
  /\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments
 
  ___
  pve-user mailing list
  pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
  http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
 
 
 
  ___
  pve-user mailing list
  pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
  http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
 



 --
 Best regards,
 [COOLCOLD-RIPN]

___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Martin Maurer
But my real question remains, why keep using 2.6 redhat old and dirty kernel 
?!?!?
Our kernel is not old (and not dirty, whatever you mean with this), why do you 
think so? It’s based on the current RHEL64 kernel, most used kernel around the 
world.

Martin
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Lex Rivera
RHEL kernel is not old. 2.6.32 RHEL != vanilla 2.6.32. Take a diff and
compare it yourself, they backport shitload of features, patches, etc
from newer kernels.

RHEL kernel is more like separate fork from vanilla kernel.

Nothing stops you from installing and running with wheezy kernel, but
you will lose openvz support.

And nothing stops you from building your own kernel as well.

Anyway, you should say thanks to openvz guys, not to proxmox team.
Recent OpenVZ patch available only for RHEL6 kernel. I heard somewhere
back in 2011 that they will be porting their patches to 3.x, but...

Honestly i hope proxmox will drop openvz support in favour of LXC.



On Thu, Jul 18, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Fábio Rabelo wrote:


Maybe it is time to change the kernel from extremely old REDHAT 2.6 to
Wheezy 3.2, at least to the one that do not use OpenVZ, like myself ?!?


Fábio Rabelo

___

pve-user mailing list

[1]pve-user@pve.proxmox.com

[2]http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

References

1. mailto:pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
2. http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Fábio Rabelo
Honestly i hope proxmox will drop openvz support in favour of LXC.

This is a very good idea, by the way !!!


Fábio Rabelo
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


Re: [PVE-User] bug in pve kernel

2013-07-19 Thread Dietmar Maurer
 Honestly i hope proxmox will drop openvz support in favour of LXC.
 
 This is a very good idea, by the way !!!

And you are 100% sure this is a good idea? You testest LXC?

My feeling is that not everybody understand the whole issue.

Besides, newer vzctl also run on vanilla kernel (with same reduced feature set 
as LXC).
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user