Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

[Alexandre DERUMIER]

>>This does work for you? 

I don't have tested it myself.

I thinked it should work

see doc here: 
http://blog.scottlowe.org/2013/05/07/using-gre-tunnels-with-open-vswitch/

ovs-vsctl add-port vmbr0 gre0 -- set interface gre0 type=gre 
options:remote_ip=


But I just notice that in
/etc/network/if-pre-up.d/openvswitch

that
   OVSIntPort)
ovs_vsctl -- --may-exist add-port "${IF_OVS_BRIDGE}"\
"${IFACE}" ${IF_OVS_OPTIONS} -- set Interface "${IFACE}"\
type=internal ${OVS_EXTRA+-- $OVS_EXTRA}


so my config,it's doing

ovs-vsctl add-port vmbr0 gre0  -- set interface gre0 type=internal -- set 
interface gre0 type=gre options:remote_ip=

that's why it doesn't work

So,indeed we need to use OVSTunnel in /etc/network/interface 

  OVSTunnel)
ovs_vsctl -- --may-exist add-port "${IF_OVS_BRIDGE}"\
"${IFACE}" ${IF_OVS_OPTIONS} -- set Interface "${IFACE}" \
type=${IF_OVS_TUNNEL_TYPE} ${IF_OVS_TUNNEL_OPTIONS} \
${OVS_EXTRA+-- $OVS_EXTRA}
;;
*)


host1
--
allow-ovs vmbr0
iface br1 inet static
address 192.168.1.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
ovs_type OVSBridge
ovs_ports gre1

allow-vmbr0 gre1
iface gre1 inet manual
ovs_bridge br1
ovs_type OVSTunnel
ovs_tunnel_type gre
ovs_tunnel_options options:remote_ip=192.168.1.2 


host2
-
allow-ovs vmbr0
iface br1 inet static
address 192.168.1.2
netmask 255.255.255.0
ovs_type OVSBridge
ovs_ports gre1

allow-vmbr0 gre1
iface gre1 inet manual
ovs_bridge br1
ovs_type OVSTunnel
ovs_tunnel_type gre
ovs_tunnel_options options:remote_ip=192.168.1.1 


Does that works for you ?


- Mail original - 

De: "Diaolin"  
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER"  
Envoyé: Mardi 11 Mars 2014 15:55:16 
Objet: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released! 

Il 2014-03-11 11:19 Alexandre DERUMIER ha scritto: 
>>> the use of a simple gre tunnel does not mean "it's crypted" 
>>> it's only encapsulated. 
>>> 
>>> My goal is to add ipsec_gre to the interface 
>>> or vxlan and gre as simple ipip tunnels 
> 
> I think you can defined it using ovs_extra section in 
> /etc/network/interface 
> 
> 
> iface gre1 inet static 
> address X.X.X.X 
> netmask 255.255.255.0 
> ovs_type OVSIntPort 
> ovs_bridge vmbr0 
> ovs_extra set interface gre1 type=gre options:remote_ip=X.X.X.X 
> 
> 
> or for vxlan 
> 
> iface vxlan1 inet static 
> address X.X.X.X 
> netmask 255.255.255.0 
> ovs_type OVSIntPort 
> ovs_bridge vmbr0 
> ovs_extra set interface vxlan1 type=vxlan 
> options:remote_ip=X.X.X.X 
> 
> 

This does work for you? 

I've tested it but the tunnel does not work if i use 
OVSIntPort instead of OVSTunnel 

Diaolin 



--- 
S’à destacà l’ultima föia dal bósch nét 
crodàda l’ei, solàgna, ‘n mèzz ai sàssi 
e ‘ntant fis-ciava ‘n zìfol de oseleti 
a tegnìr vìo ‘l pensér che vèn matìna 
[Diaolin] 
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

[Diaolin]

Il 2014-03-11 14:16 Angel Docampo ha scritto:

Damn ExtJS cache... Thank you Dietmar :)


And now

Did you find that the script for spice works?


I've so one:

#!/bin/bash

# needs pve-manager >= 3.1-44

USERNAME=root@pam
PASSWORD=mypasswd
# select VM
VMID=115

NODE=proxmox191
PROXY=192.168.1.191

DATA=`curl -k -d "username=$USERNAME&password=$PASSWORD"  
https://$PROXY:8006/api2/json/access/ticket`


TICKET=`echo $DATA|sed 's/\//\//g' | sed 's/[{}]//g' | awk -v 
k="text" '{n=split($0,a,","); for (i=1; i<=n; i++) print a[i]}' | sed 
's/\"\:\"/\|/g' | sed 's/[\,]/ /g' | sed 's/\"// g'|grep -w ticket|  awk 
-F "|" '{print $2}'`


CSRF=`echo $DATA|sed 's/\//\//g' | sed 's/[{}]//g' | awk -v k="text" 
'{n=split($0,a,","); for (i=1; i<=n; i++) print a[i]}' | sed 
's/\"\:\"/\|/g' | sed 's/[\,]/ /g' | sed 's/\"// g'|grep -w 
CSRFPreventionToken| awk -F "|" '{print $2}'`


https://$PROXY:8006/api2/spiceconfig/nodes/$NODE/qemu/$VMID/spiceproxy 
-d \"proxy=$PROXY\"" >>spice.txt
curl -k -b "PVEAuthCookie=$TICKET" -H "CSRFPreventionToken: $CSRF" 
https://$PROXY:8006/api2/spiceconfig/nodes/$NODE/qemu/$VMID/spiceproxy 
-d "proxy=$PROXY" > spiceproxy






remote-viewer spiceproxy

but it says always spiceproxy file invalid


:-(

Diaolin






Angel Docampo
Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
Tel. 93.476.69.10 - 6711


De: Dietmar Maurer 
Enviado: martes, 11 de marzo de 2014 13:58
Para: Angel Docampo; Martin Maurer; Guy
Cc: proxmoxve (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com)
Asunto: RE: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

Could you please put the link to the updated API docs? Or the place 
where
those changes are reflected, because I still cannot see the changes or 
I'm

seeing the outdated doc.


http://pve.proxmox.com/pve2-api-doc/


___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user


---
S’à destacà l’ultima föia dal bósch nét
crodàda l’ei, solàgna, ‘n mèzz ai sàssi
e ‘ntant fis-ciava ‘n zìfol de oseleti
a tegnìr vìo ‘l pensér che vèn matìna
[Diaolin]
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

[PVE-User] Different node versions

[Luis G. Coralle]

Hello everyone, may have a cluster of three nodes, two of which with
version pve 3.0 and the third with pve 3.2?

-- 
Luis G. Coralle
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

[Angel Docampo]

Damn ExtJS cache... Thank you Dietmar :)


Angel Docampo
Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
Tel. 93.476.69.10 - 6711


De: Dietmar Maurer 
Enviado: martes, 11 de marzo de 2014 13:58
Para: Angel Docampo; Martin Maurer; Guy
Cc: proxmoxve (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com)
Asunto: RE: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

> Could you please put the link to the updated API docs? Or the place where
> those changes are reflected, because I still cannot see the changes or I'm
> seeing the outdated doc.

http://pve.proxmox.com/pve2-api-doc/


___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

[Dietmar Maurer]

> Could you please put the link to the updated API docs? Or the place where
> those changes are reflected, because I still cannot see the changes or I'm
> seeing the outdated doc.

http://pve.proxmox.com/pve2-api-doc/


___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

[Angel Docampo]

Hello Dietmar, 


Could you please put the link to the updated API docs? Or the place where those 
changes are reflected, because I still cannot see the changes or I'm seeing the 
outdated doc.

Thank you!


Angel Docampo
Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
Tel. 93.476.69.10 - 6711


De: Dietmar Maurer 
Enviado: martes, 11 de marzo de 2014 6:21
Para: Angel Docampo; Martin Maurer; Guy
Cc: proxmoxve (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com)
Asunto: RE: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

I juts updated the API docs.

Basically spiceproxy API changed from GET to POST (so you need to pass the CSRF 
token).

___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] (solved) update from 3.1 to 3.2

[Stefan Fuhrmann]

Hello all,
yes thanks!! 
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Package_repositories#Proxmox_VE_No-Subscription_Repository
do it now!

Thanks!!
Stefan

Am Dienstag, 11. März 2014, 11:35:57 schrieb Stefan Fuhrmann:
> Hello all,
> I noticed that 3.2 is available. But how to update? Im having no
> subscription. Doing apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade do nothing.
> Was not able to find any update instructions.
> I missed some information?
> 
> Can someone help?
> 
> tia
> Stefan
> ___
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Online migration leaves firewall vm without service

[Angel Docampo]

Thanks you both

@Eneko: I've migrated those firewalls from Xen to Proxmox some months ago. As 
it was my very first migration from another platform to proxmox, in order to 
avoid problems with drivers I used "standard" components (i.e.: ide disks and 
e1000 eths).

@Barry: I am not using openvz, but kvm machines. And I have iptables disabled 
in all nodes.

Thank you

Angel Docampo
Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
Tel. 93.476.69.10 - 6711


De: Barry Flanagan 
Enviado: martes, 11 de marzo de 2014 12:05
Para: Angel Docampo
Cc: Adam Thompson; proxmoxve (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com)
Asunto: Re: [PVE-User] Online migration leaves firewall vm without service

On 11 March 2014 10:59, Angel Docampo 
mailto:adoca...@dltec.net>> wrote:
Iptables



Perhaps in the target node you do not have ipt_state listed in the IPTABLES 
variable at the bottom of /etc/vz/vz.conf

-Barry Flanagan

Angel Docampo
Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
Tel. 93.476.69.10 - 6711


De: Adam Thompson mailto:athom...@athompso.net>>
Enviado: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2014 22:02
Para: Angel Docampo
Cc: proxmoxve (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com)
Asunto: Re: [PVE-User] Online migration leaves firewall vm without service

I don't experience this.
What kind of firewall?
-Adam

On Mar 10, 2014 11:04 AM, Angel Docampo 
mailto:adoca...@dltec.net>> wrote:
>
> I would like to ask here if you suffer the same issue than me. When upgrading 
> proxmox,  I must move the virtual machines fron node to node in order to 
> reboot the node.
>
> Everything works fine except for the firewalls I have virtualized. All of 
> them, without exception, stop working. My laptop cannot ping the Internet and 
> everything is restablished when I reboot the VM.
>
> Any of you have the same issue? There is some workaround?
>
> Thanks,
> --
>
> Angel Docampo
> Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
> Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
> Tel. 93 476 69 14 - Ext: 706
> Mob. 670.299.381
>
> Nota Legal
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Online migration leaves firewall vm without service

[Barry Flanagan]

On 11 March 2014 10:59, Angel Docampo  wrote:

> Iptables
>
>
>
Perhaps in the target node you do not have ipt_state listed in the IPTABLES
variable at the bottom of /etc/vz/vz.conf

-Barry Flanagan


> Angel Docampo
> Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
> Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
> Tel. 93.476.69.10 - 6711
>
> 
> De: Adam Thompson 
> Enviado: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2014 22:02
> Para: Angel Docampo
> Cc: proxmoxve (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com)
> Asunto: Re: [PVE-User] Online migration leaves firewall vm without service
>
> I don't experience this.
> What kind of firewall?
> -Adam
>
> On Mar 10, 2014 11:04 AM, Angel Docampo  wrote:
> >
> > I would like to ask here if you suffer the same issue than me. When
> upgrading proxmox,  I must move the virtual machines fron node to node in
> order to reboot the node.
> >
> > Everything works fine except for the firewalls I have virtualized. All
> of them, without exception, stop working. My laptop cannot ping the
> Internet and everything is restablished when I reboot the VM.
> >
> > Any of you have the same issue? There is some workaround?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> >
> > Angel Docampo
> > Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
> > Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
> > Tel. 93 476 69 14 - Ext: 706
> > Mob. 670.299.381
> >
> > Nota Legal
> ___
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Online migration leaves firewall vm without service

[Eneko Lacunza]

Hi Angel,

We have a virtualized iptables firewall too, and haven't noticed such 
problema when live-migrating from one node to another.


What kind of network are you using? We use virtio, bridged. Our nodes 
are connected to the same network switch.


Cheers
Eneko

On 11/03/14 11:59, Angel Docampo wrote:

Iptables


Angel Docampo
Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
Tel. 93.476.69.10 - 6711


De: Adam Thompson 
Enviado: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2014 22:02
Para: Angel Docampo
Cc: proxmoxve (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com)
Asunto: Re: [PVE-User] Online migration leaves firewall vm without service

I don't experience this.
What kind of firewall?
-Adam

On Mar 10, 2014 11:04 AM, Angel Docampo  wrote:

I would like to ask here if you suffer the same issue than me. When upgrading 
proxmox,  I must move the virtual machines fron node to node in order to reboot 
the node.

Everything works fine except for the firewalls I have virtualized. All of them, 
without exception, stop working. My laptop cannot ping the Internet and 
everything is restablished when I reboot the VM.

Any of you have the same issue? There is some workaround?

Thanks,
--

Angel Docampo
Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
Tel. 93 476 69 14 - Ext: 706
Mob. 670.299.381

Nota Legal

___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user





--
Zuzendari Teknikoa / Director Técnico
Binovo IT Human Project, S.L.
Telf. 943575997
  943493611
Astigarraga bidea 2, planta 6 dcha., ofi. 3-2; 20180 Oiartzun (Gipuzkoa)
www.binovo.es

___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] OVSswitch (changed Subject)

[Diaolin]

Il 2014-03-11 11:36 Diaolin ha scritto:

Il 2014-03-11 11:19 Alexandre DERUMIER ha scritto:

the use of a simple gre tunnel does not mean "it's crypted"
it's only encapsulated.




iface gre1 inet static
address  X.X.X.X
netmask  255.255.255.0
ovs_type OVSIntPort
ovs_bridge vmbr0
ovs_extra set interface gre1 type=gre 
options:remote_ip=X.X.X.X





Yeah, of course but why not use OVSTunnel?
Have the two port the same behaviour?



I'd tested it but with OVSIntPort does not work, it says alway
no tunnel port

Diaolin



---
S’à destacà l’ultima föia dal bósch nét
crodàda l’ei, solàgna, ‘n mèzz ai sàssi
e ‘ntant fis-ciava ‘n zìfol de oseleti
a tegnìr vìo ‘l pensér che vèn matìna
[Diaolin]
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Online migration leaves firewall vm without service

[Angel Docampo]

Iptables


Angel Docampo
Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
Tel. 93.476.69.10 - 6711


De: Adam Thompson 
Enviado: lunes, 10 de marzo de 2014 22:02
Para: Angel Docampo
Cc: proxmoxve (pve-user@pve.proxmox.com)
Asunto: Re: [PVE-User] Online migration leaves firewall vm without service

I don't experience this.
What kind of firewall?
-Adam

On Mar 10, 2014 11:04 AM, Angel Docampo  wrote:
>
> I would like to ask here if you suffer the same issue than me. When upgrading 
> proxmox,  I must move the virtual machines fron node to node in order to 
> reboot the node.
>
> Everything works fine except for the firewalls I have virtualized. All of 
> them, without exception, stop working. My laptop cannot ping the Internet and 
> everything is restablished when I reboot the VM.
>
> Any of you have the same issue? There is some workaround?
>
> Thanks,
> --
>
> Angel Docampo
> Datalab Tecnologia, s.a.
> Castillejos, 352 - 08025 Barcelona
> Tel. 93 476 69 14 - Ext: 706
> Mob. 670.299.381
>
> Nota Legal
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] update from 3.1 to 3.2

[Wijatmoko U. Prayitno]

Take a look here:
http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Downloads#Update_a_running_Proxmox_Virtual_Environment_3.x_to_latest_3.2

On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:35:57 +0100
Stefan Fuhrmann  wrote:

> Hello all,
> I noticed that 3.2 is available. But how to update? Im having no
> subscription. Doing apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade do nothing.
> Was not able to find any update instructions.
> I missed some information?
> 
> Can someone help?
> 
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] OVSswitch (changed Subject)

[Diaolin]

Il 2014-03-11 11:19 Alexandre DERUMIER ha scritto:

the use of a simple gre tunnel does not mean "it's crypted"
it's only encapsulated.

My goal is to add ipsec_gre to the interface
or vxlan and gre as simple ipip tunnels


I think you can defined it using ovs_extra section in 
/etc/network/interface








iface gre1 inet static
address  X.X.X.X
netmask  255.255.255.0
ovs_type OVSIntPort
ovs_bridge vmbr0
ovs_extra set interface gre1 type=gre options:remote_ip=X.X.X.X




Yeah, of course but why not use OVSTunnel?
Have the two port the same behaviour?



Diaolin



---
S’à destacà l’ultima föia dal bósch nét
crodàda l’ei, solàgna, ‘n mèzz ai sàssi
e ‘ntant fis-ciava ‘n zìfol de oseleti
a tegnìr vìo ‘l pensér che vèn matìna
[Diaolin]
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

[PVE-User] update from 3.1 to 3.2

[Stefan Fuhrmann]

Hello all,
I noticed that 3.2 is available. But how to update? Im having no subscription. 
Doing apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade do nothing.
Was not able to find any update instructions.
I missed some information?

Can someone help?

tia 
Stefan
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

[Alexandre DERUMIER]

>>the use of a simple gre tunnel does not mean "it's crypted" 
>>it's only encapsulated. 
>>
>>My goal is to add ipsec_gre to the interface 
>>or vxlan and gre as simple ipip tunnels 

I think you can defined it using ovs_extra section in /etc/network/interface


iface gre1 inet static
address  X.X.X.X
netmask  255.255.255.0
ovs_type OVSIntPort
ovs_bridge vmbr0
ovs_extra set interface gre1 type=gre options:remote_ip=X.X.X.X


or for vxlan

iface vxlan1 inet static
address  X.X.X.X
netmask  255.255.255.0
ovs_type OVSIntPort
ovs_bridge vmbr0
ovs_extra set interface vxlan1 type=vxlan options:remote_ip=X.X.X.X


- Mail original - 

De: "Diaolin"  
À: "pve-user pve.proxmox.com"  
Envoyé: Mardi 11 Mars 2014 09:52:37 
Objet: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released! 

Il 2014-03-11 07:32 Dietmar Maurer ha scritto: 
>> Dmz is separated And connected via tunnel And the three nodes could be 
>> remote 
> 
> Sounds reasonable. I currently do not have free time to work on that, 
> but I would accept a patch. 

Just for clearing: 

the use of a simple gre tunnel does not mean "it's crypted" 
it's only encapsulated. 

My goal is to add ipsec_gre to the interface 
or vxlan and gre as simple ipip tunnels 

In any case using it as isolated zones 

Diaolin 


--- 
S’à destacà l’ultima föia dal bósch nét 
crodàda l’ei, solàgna, ‘n mèzz ai sàssi 
e ‘ntant fis-ciava ‘n zìfol de oseleti 
a tegnìr vìo ‘l pensér che vèn matìna 
[Diaolin] 
___ 
pve-user mailing list 
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com 
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user 
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 3.2 released!

[Diaolin]

Il 2014-03-11 07:32 Dietmar Maurer ha scritto:

Dmz is separated And connected via tunnel And the three nodes could be
remote


Sounds reasonable. I currently do not have free time to work on that,
but I would accept a patch.


Just for clearing:

the use of a simple gre tunnel does not mean "it's crypted"
it's only encapsulated.

My goal is to add ipsec_gre to the interface
or vxlan and gre as simple ipip tunnels

In any case using it as isolated zones

Diaolin


---
S’à destacà l’ultima föia dal bósch nét
crodàda l’ei, solàgna, ‘n mèzz ai sàssi
e ‘ntant fis-ciava ‘n zìfol de oseleti
a tegnìr vìo ‘l pensér che vèn matìna
[Diaolin]
___
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user