Re: [pydotorg-www] Implementing a personal standard library

[anatoly techtonik]

There is also a related initiative to split standard library into pieces.
https://bitbucket.org/techtonik/python-stdlib

So that you can have bugs per module, feedback per module,
discussions per module and teams organized per module. As well
as votes per module and all kind of various metrics including the
quality ratio and feedback whenever the module should be
refactored, deprecated, replaced or removed from standard library.

In the long term space exploration program every module could also
accumulate stories of usage (both good and bad) and scenarios
(planned usage workflow), which will provide essential source data
for reengineering efforts. So far no funding had been secured to go
on with this plan.


On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Richard Prosser
 wrote:
> Thanks - that's what I was looking for, though I think that the issue should
> be given higher priority, somehow.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> On 24 January 2014 20:50, M.-A. Lemburg  wrote:
>>
>> On 24.01.2014 21:19, Richard Prosser wrote:
>> > IMO, the Standard Library is overblown and outdated, so users may wish
>> > to
>> > implement their own. This may be the subject of a PEP beyond the one
>> > (411)
>> > mentioned in the post below.
>> >
>> > This "Dead Batteries
>> >
>> > Included"blog
>> > post suggests a way of doing that - a pip
>> > requirements file - but I am reluctant to link to that particular page,
>> > if
>> > only because there are no detailed instructions supplied. I am also
>> > unsure
>> > where to place it, or the equivalent text.
>> >
>> > Do you have any suggestions, please? Perhaps there should be a
>> > "Practical
>> > Python" section or the like.
>>
>> You might want to have a look at this page:
>>
>> https://wiki.python.org/moin/CodingProjectIdeas/StandardLibrary
>>
>> --
>> Marc-Andre Lemburg
>> eGenix.com
>>
>> Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, Jan 24 2014)
>> >>> Python Projects, Consulting and Support ...   http://www.egenix.com/
>> >>> mxODBC.Zope/Plone.Database.Adapter ...   http://zope.egenix.com/
>> >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...http://python.egenix.com/
>> 
>>
>> : Try our mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::
>>
>>eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
>> D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
>>Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
>>http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
>
>
>
> ___
> pydotorg-www mailing list
> pydotorg-www@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
>



-- 
anatoly t.
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
pydotorg-www@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www

Re: [pydotorg-www] Implementing a personal standard library

[Richard Prosser]

Thanks - that's what I was looking for, though I think that the issue
should be given higher priority, somehow.

Richard



On 24 January 2014 20:50, M.-A. Lemburg  wrote:

> On 24.01.2014 21:19, Richard Prosser wrote:
> > IMO, the Standard Library is overblown and outdated, so users may wish to
> > implement their own. This may be the subject of a PEP beyond the one
> (411)
> > mentioned in the post below.
> >
> > This "Dead Batteries
> > Included"<
> http://programming.oreilly.com/2013/10/dead-batteries-included.html>blog
> > post suggests a way of doing that - a pip
> > requirements file - but I am reluctant to link to that particular page,
> if
> > only because there are no detailed instructions supplied. I am also
> unsure
> > where to place it, or the equivalent text.
> >
> > Do you have any suggestions, please? Perhaps there should be a "Practical
> > Python" section or the like.
>
> You might want to have a look at this page:
>
> https://wiki.python.org/moin/CodingProjectIdeas/StandardLibrary
>
> --
> Marc-Andre Lemburg
> eGenix.com
>
> Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, Jan 24 2014)
> >>> Python Projects, Consulting and Support ...   http://www.egenix.com/
> >>> mxODBC.Zope/Plone.Database.Adapter ...   http://zope.egenix.com/
> >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...http://python.egenix.com/
> 
>
> : Try our mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::
>
>eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
> D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
>Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
>http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
>
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
pydotorg-www@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www

Re: [pydotorg-www] Implementing a personal standard library

[anatoly techtonik]

python-id...@python.org

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Richard Prosser
 wrote:
> IMO, the Standard Library is overblown and outdated, so users may wish to
> implement their own. This may be the subject of a PEP beyond the one (411)
> mentioned in the post below.
>
> This "Dead Batteries Included" blog post suggests a way of doing that - a
> pip requirements file - but I am reluctant to link to that particular page,
> if only because there are no detailed instructions supplied. I am also
> unsure where to place it, or the equivalent text.
>
> Do you have any suggestions, please? Perhaps there should be a "Practical
> Python" section or the like.
>
>
> Thanks ...
>
> Richard
>
>
> ___
> pydotorg-www mailing list
> pydotorg-www@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
>



-- 
anatoly t.
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
pydotorg-www@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www

Re: [pydotorg-www] Implementing a personal standard library

[M.-A. Lemburg]

On 24.01.2014 21:19, Richard Prosser wrote:
> IMO, the Standard Library is overblown and outdated, so users may wish to
> implement their own. This may be the subject of a PEP beyond the one (411)
> mentioned in the post below.
> 
> This "Dead Batteries
> Included"blog
> post suggests a way of doing that - a pip
> requirements file - but I am reluctant to link to that particular page, if
> only because there are no detailed instructions supplied. I am also unsure
> where to place it, or the equivalent text.
> 
> Do you have any suggestions, please? Perhaps there should be a "Practical
> Python" section or the like.

You might want to have a look at this page:

https://wiki.python.org/moin/CodingProjectIdeas/StandardLibrary

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, Jan 24 2014)
>>> Python Projects, Consulting and Support ...   http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope/Plone.Database.Adapter ...   http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...http://python.egenix.com/


: Try our mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::

   eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH  Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
   Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
   http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
pydotorg-www@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www

Re: [pydotorg-www] Implementing a personal standard library

[Carl Karsten]

Why did you post that question to this list?

I'll be happy to follow up to your question, but probably not here.


On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Richard Prosser
wrote:

> IMO, the Standard Library is overblown and outdated, so users may wish to
> implement their own. This may be the subject of a PEP beyond the one (411)
> mentioned in the post below.
>
> This "Dead Batteries 
> Included"blog
>  post suggests a way of doing that - a pip
> requirements file - but I am reluctant to link to that particular page, if
> only because there are no detailed instructions supplied. I am also unsure
> where to place it, or the equivalent text.
>
> Do you have any suggestions, please? Perhaps there should be a "Practical
> Python" section or the like.
>
>
> Thanks ...
>
> Richard
>
>
> ___
> pydotorg-www mailing list
> pydotorg-www@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
>
>


-- 
Carl K
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
pydotorg-www@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www

[pydotorg-www] Implementing a personal standard library

[Richard Prosser]

IMO, the Standard Library is overblown and outdated, so users may wish to
implement their own. This may be the subject of a PEP beyond the one (411)
mentioned in the post below.

This "Dead Batteries
Included"blog
post suggests a way of doing that - a pip
requirements file - but I am reluctant to link to that particular page, if
only because there are no detailed instructions supplied. I am also unsure
where to place it, or the equivalent text.

Do you have any suggestions, please? Perhaps there should be a "Practical
Python" section or the like.


Thanks ...

Richard
___
pydotorg-www mailing list
pydotorg-www@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www