Re: [PyKDE] DCOP Problems and Solutions

2003-11-18 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

 I'd be interested in hearing opinions on any of this. I'll make
 some decision on kab in the next few days depending on what
 feedback I get.

Now obviously I'm for putting kab in pyKDE :) I'm not sure what kjs exactly 
does - but working in python and then allowing java-script for scripting - 
doesn't make much sense to me. 

For the problem I want kab for - python play out its strenghs when dealing 
with conversions between different sorts of (string-based) formats. And 
there's plethorea of PDA/CellPhones out there, that could benefit from an 
fairly easy way to be synchronized, because all of them have their own 
format...

Of course I'm not sure what kdepim is up to  - maybe they will change great 
parts of the related interface, so putting effort into kab would make not 
much sense - at least now. Does anybody know what they are going to change 
for kde 3.2?

Regards,

Diez

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/umIKBUNnEs5xWG4RAg82AJ9LOfDpMA3lE9PzpKXrThaCx/YzKgCgms0L
7inbkTCV7A1fBuMUHkyZtpo=
=0YOq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
PyKDE mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde


Re: [PyKDE] DCOP Problems and Solutions

2003-11-18 Thread Jim Bublitz
On Tuesday November 18 2003 10:16, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:

  I'd be interested in hearing opinions on any of this. I'll
  make some decision on kab in the next few days depending on
  what feedback I get.

 Now obviously I'm for putting kab in pyKDE :) I'm not sure
 what kjs exactly does - but working in python and then
 allowing java-script for scripting - doesn't make much sense
 to me.

kjs is in PyKDE because it fits in with khtml (and more likely 
because it was fairly easy to add).

 For the problem I want kab for - python play out its strenghs
 when dealing with conversions between different sorts of
 (string-based) formats. And there's plethorea of
 PDA/CellPhones out there, that could benefit from an fairly
 easy way to be synchronized, because all of them have their
 own format...

It seems like a good Python application to me - the first program 
I did with Python/PyKDE was an address book (before I started 
maintaining PyKDE).

 Of course I'm not sure what kdepim is up to  - maybe they will
 change great parts of the related interface, so putting effort
 into kab would make not much sense - at least now. Does
 anybody know what they are going to change for kde 3.2?

Just from looking at 3.2 briefly, it appears that the address 
book application (along with KMail, KOrganizer and some other 
stuff) will all be rolled into kontact but still remain as 
standalone applications.  I would expect the kab lib won't 
change much though. I'd also like to be able to script kontact 
eventually (and a lot of it is plugin-based already).

Jim

___
PyKDE mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde