[issue2736] datetime needs and epoch method
Miki Tebeka [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I think the name is not good, should be toepoch or something like that. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2736 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2775] Implement PEP 3108
Andrews Patrick Rocha Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The files Python/compile.c and Python/pythonrun.c depends of the _symtable (Python/symtable.c and Include/symtable.h). What I do for remove _symtable in py3k? __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2775 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2775] Implement PEP 3108
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Andrews, this discussion would be more appropriate to the mailing list, but anyway: I believe you're mixing things up. When PEP 3108 says remove symtable/_symtable, it must be talking only about symtable.py and symtablemodule.c, not symtable.[ch] (used by the compiler). -- nosy: +hdiogenes __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2775 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1267629] pdb: implement until,fix for 1248119
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Benjamin: please reformat to PEP 8, then this is okay to check in. Don't forget docs and NEWS updates. -- assignee: - benjamin.peterson nosy: +benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl resolution: - accepted _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1267629 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2763] A socket example code shown in doc doesn't work on FreeBSD
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Duplicate of #2742. -- resolution: - duplicate status: open - closed superseder: - example code does not work __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2763 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2742] example code does not work
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Applied the documentation patch in r63039. Thanks for your efforts! -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2742 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
New submission from Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Let's make an intentional syntax error... print Testing\ SyntaxError: EOL while scanning single-quoted string Please focus on the part of the error message that states while scanning single-quoted string. How can Python claim it scanned a single-quoted string when I fed it with a double-quoted string? That is a quote type recognition bug in Python which should be fixed. The error message in this case should, however, be: SyntaxError: EOL while scanning double-quoted string -- messages: 66607 nosy: chester severity: normal status: open title: Quote-type recognition bug versions: Python 2.5 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I have e-mailed Guido van Rossum about this. He replied: Good find. Please file a bug on bugs.python.org. If that wasn't a bug, he wouldn't have said that, would he? __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
Changes by Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- versions: +Python 2.1.1, Python 2.1.2, Python 2.2, Python 2.2.1, Python 2.2.2, Python 2.2.3, Python 2.3, Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 2.6 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
Changes by Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- versions: +3rd party __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2756] urllib2 add_header fails with existing unredirected_header
Changes by Martin McNickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10280/add_header_complete.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2756 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822
Changes by Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10279/mailbox-replace_rfc822.patch Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2756] urllib2 add_header fails with existing unredirected_header
Changes by Martin McNickle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10201/add_header_complete.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2756 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
Changes by Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- versions: +Python 3.0 -Python 2.5 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
Robert Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: It seems single-quoted doesn't mean the actual quotation sign used but rather how many you used. Compare the multiline triple quote syntax: $ cat foo.py bar $ python foo.py File foo.py, line 3 ^ SyntaxError: EOF while scanning triple-quoted string This shouldn't read sextuple-quoted string, should it? -- nosy: +lehmannro __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822
Changes by Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10272/mailbox.py.patch2 Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2736] datetime needs and epoch method
Neil Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: datetime has fromtimestamp already, so using totimestamp keeps naming consistency (see toordinal and fromordinal). -- nosy: +Neil Muller __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2736 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1491] BaseHTTPServer incorrectly implements response code 100
Changes by Simon Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +hodgestar __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1491 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This is not a bug in my opinion -- Robert has stated why. However, since you contacted Guido, let him decide. :) -- assignee: - gvanrossum nosy: +georg.brandl, gvanrossum __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2812] Document property.getter/setter/deleter etc
New submission from Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Changed a bit and committed as r63043. -- resolution: - accepted status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2812 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2814] Remove old classes from mailbox module
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks, committed patch as r63045. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - accepted status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2814 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I removed the old classes in 3k. There remains one usage of rfc822, as the default factory of Maildir. It's replaced by None in the patch here; is that safe to do? -- nosy: +georg.brandl Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2709] tk.rst possibly wrong ?
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: It refers to the docs in the Python docs. I tried to clarify that in r63052. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2709 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2147] int operations no longer overflow
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: OK, I think I fixed the remaining locations in r63055. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2147 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2800] make htmlhelp creates python30a5.chm but msi.py expects pydoc.chm
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Is there a way to run the tree Python? __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2800 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2129] Link error of gethostbyaddr and gethostname in Python Manuals (the chm file)
Changes by Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- status: pending - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2129 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2741] documentation -- do serversockets work with ipv6
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Okay, this should now be clearer in r63057. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2741 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2721] unittest.makeSuite undocumented and obsolete - but what to use instead?
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The replacement is TestLoader().loadTestsFromTestCase(), and it's already in a prominent place in the docs: Instead of :func:`unittest.main`, there are other ways to run the tests with a finer level of control, less terse output, and no requirement to be run from the command line. For example, the last two lines may be replaced with:: suite = unittest.TestLoader().loadTestsFromTestCase(TestSequenceFunctions) unittest.TextTestRunner(verbosity=2).run(suite) Closing as works for me. -- resolution: - works for me status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2721 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2659] textwrap handling of hyphenation
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks for the patch! Reviewed and committed as r63053. -- resolution: - accepted status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2659 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2452] inaccuracy in httplib timeout documentation
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks, fixed in r63058. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2452 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2768] os.fstat and other os.f* methods should use PyObject_AsFileDescriptor
Neil Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This patch combines the two earlier patches, and also updates the docstrings and os.rst to reflect the changed behaviour. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10281/posixmodule_2.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2768 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2709] tk.rst possibly wrong ?
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: After talking to Guilherme on IRC, I'd like to propose this new patch. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +benjamin.peterson Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10282/tk_doc.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2709 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2817] Make Python create a tuple with one element in a clean way
New submission from Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]: To create a tuple with one element, you need to do this: my_tuple = (1,)# Note the trailing comma after the value 1 type(my_tuple) type 'tuple' But if you do this my_tuple = (1) type(my_tuple) type 'int' you don't get a tuple. I thought that just putting a value inside ( ) would make a tuple. Apparently that is not the case. I hate ugly code so it would be clean if Python would convert anything put into ( ) to be a tuple, even if just one value was put in (without having to use that ugly looking comma with no value after it). -- messages: 66626 nosy: chester severity: normal status: open title: Make Python create a tuple with one element in a clean way type: feature request versions: 3rd party, Python 2.1.1, Python 2.1.2, Python 2.2, Python 2.2.1, Python 2.2.2, Python 2.2.3, Python 2.3, Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2817 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2817] Make Python create a tuple with one element in a clean way
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: But we need parentheses for grouping! -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2817 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2818] pulldom cannot handle xml file with large external entity properly
New submission from Luyang Han [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
when use xml.dom.pulldom module to parse a large xml file, if all the
information is saved in one xml file, the module can handle it in the
following way without construction the whole DOM:
events = xml.dom.pulldom.parse('file.xml')
for (event, node) in events:
process(event, node)
But if 'file.xml' contains some large external entities, for example:
!ENTITY file_external SYSTEM others.xml
bodyfile_external;/body
Then using the same python snippet above leads to enormous memory
usage. I did not perform a concrete benchmark, in one case a 3M
external xml file drained about 1 GB memory. I think in this case it
might be the whole DOM structure is constructed.
--
components: XML
messages: 66628
nosy: hanselda
severity: normal
status: open
title: pulldom cannot handle xml file with large external entity properly
type: resource usage
versions: Python 2.5
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2818
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1792] o(n*n) marshal.dumps performance for largish objects with patch
A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I've applied Facundo's version of the patch in r63059. -- nosy: +akuchling resolution: - accepted status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1792 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2709] tk.rst possibly wrong ?
Changes by Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10284/othergui.rst.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2709 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1858] Make .pypirc handle multiple servers
A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Brett backed out my commit in r63002 because I forgot to include the distutils.config module. Re-committed in r63014 and r63060. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1858 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1267629] pdb: implement until,fix for 1248119
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Reviewed and committed in r63061 _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1267629 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1267629] pdb: implement until,fix for 1248119
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- status: open - closed _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1267629 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2817] Make Python create a tuple with one element in a clean way
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: That's an absolute no-starter. Not the parentheses make the tuple, the commas do. The empty tuple is the exception, not the rule. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - rejected status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2817 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2709] tk.rst possibly wrong ?
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks, committed both patches in r63066. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2709 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: As the term single-quoted string is clearly ambiguous, I propose to change the error message to just string (or perhaps string literal, but then you'd have to change the triple-quoted message to triple-quoted string literal too for consistency). __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: OK, done so in r63068. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1326] internal zipimport.zipimporter feature untested
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Committed the test and added new docs in r63067. Thanks! -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1326 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2710] error: (10035, 'The socket operation could not complete without blocking')
Changes by Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- components: +IDLE __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2710 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2787] Patch to flush unittest output
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks, committed patch as r63069. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - accepted status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2787 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2803] heapq.heappush called with too few arguments in sched.py
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks, fixed in r63070, r63071 (2.5). -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2803 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2819] Full precision summation
Changes by Jean Brouwers [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10286/mathmodule.c.2.6a3.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2819 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2819] Full precision summation
Changes by Jean Brouwers [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10287/test_math_sum1.py __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2819 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2816] Quote-type recognition bug
Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: It would be better to say End of line while scanning string (string, line 1) and End of f... while scanning multi-line string (string, line 1) These messages really need to be clear, so putting EOF for example (which I really don't know what it stands for) is really mind-bending. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2816 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2800] make htmlhelp creates python30a5.chm but msi.py expects pydoc.chm
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Is there a way to run the tree Python? Currently, that should be possible, as the documentation is built after Python. However, in the long term, cross-compilation needs to be considered (to AMD64 on an x86 machine); then you can't run the tree python on the build machine. I would prefer if there was a makefile target that invoked hhc, from %ProgramFiles%\HTML Help Workshop\hhc.exe directly. It's guaranteed that make (i.e. cygwin make) will find a Python interpreter (i.e. cygwin python2.5). Then buidmsi could just invoke that target directly after htmlhelp. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2800 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2817] Make Python create a tuple with one element in a clean way
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Just in case the previous comments aren't clear: Would you rather see py (3+4)*5 35 or py (3+4)*5 (7, 7, 7, 7, 7) -- nosy: +loewis __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2817 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2775] Implement PEP 3108
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I'm working on the new package tkinter and dialogs merging where appropriate. -- nosy: +gpolo __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2775 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2809] string docstring doesn't mention that ' '.split() != ' '.split(' ')
David Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I don't think this really addresses the issue properly...
The original docstring read:
+Note that not specifying sep (or using None) will cause\n\
+empty strings to be removed from the output. thus ' '.strip()\n\
+returns []. while ' '.strip(' ') returns ['', ''].
(Obviously strip is wrong here, it should be split)
The committed docstring reads:
+If sep is not specified or is None, any whitespace string is a
separator and leading and trailing whitespace is stripped before splitting.
But the point is not just that leading and trailing whitespace is
stripped; ''.strip() returns [] while ''.strip(' ') returns ['']. This
is probably the most unexpected corner case; it seems to be better to
say that empty strings are removed from the output.
--
nosy: +davidfraser
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2809
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2820] Remove mac modules
New submission from Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've removed the Mac modules. The Bazaar branch is at http://code.python.org/python/users/benjamin.peterson/mac_module_removal/. -- assignee: brett.cannon components: Extension Modules messages: 66648 nosy: benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon priority: critical severity: normal status: open title: Remove mac modules type: feature request versions: Python 3.0 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2820 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2810] _winreg.EnumValue fails when the registry data includes multibyte unicode characters
Daniel Stutzbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: After several failed attempts at making a test case, and stepping through C code with a debugger, I see that my initial diagnose is quite wrong. RegQueryInfoKey *does* return the sizes in units of bytes (even though the Microsoft documentation says otherwise). My apologies. I do still have a stack trace from an end-user of my python2.5-based product, showing that _winreg.EnumValue raises: WindowsError: [Error 234] More data is available The application reliably crashes on start-up for this user, when trying to read some registry entries written by another program and hitting the above exception. Unfortunately, I have been unable to reproduce the problem locally. I tried a variety of Unicode characters (including some that encode to 4 bytes), and that didn't raise an exception. I also tried putting some very long data strings (more than 64kb) into the registry, and that worked fine too (even though the Microsoft documentation says the ANSI version *should* return the above exception!). I'm going to try building a custom PyEnumValue that will dynamically grow the buffer size when that error occurs. I'll report back on how that works out for the end user. In the meantime, I'm open to other theories on what might cause RegEnumValue to fail with that error. The end user is running Vista, if it matters. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2810 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2817] Make Python create a tuple with one element in a clean way
Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Martin I see the point now. I appologize for not having the clear head of seeing the possible damage that my feature request would make. I take my request back. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2817 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2821] unittest.py sys.exit error
New submission from Adam Getchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Picking the canonical example of unit test: import random import unittest class TestSequenceFunctions(unittest.TestCase): def setUp(self): self.seq = range(10) def testshuffle(self): # make sure the shuffled sequence does not lose any elements random.shuffle(self.seq) self.seq.sort() self.assertEqual(self.seq, range(10)) def testchoice(self): element = random.choice(self.seq) self.assert_(element in self.seq) def testsample(self): self.assertRaises(ValueError, random.sample, self.seq, 20) for element in random.sample(self.seq, 5): self.assert_(element in self.seq) if __name__ == '__main__': unittest.main() Gives the following error: ... -- Ran 3 tests in 0.003s OK Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Projects\Python\randomunittest.py, line 25, in module unittest.main() File C:\Python25\lib\unittest.py, line 768, in __init__ self.runTests() File C:\Python25\lib\unittest.py, line 806, in runTests sys.exit(not result.wasSuccessful()) SystemExit: False The error lies in the following code snippet: def runTests(self): if self.testRunner is None: self.testRunner = TextTestRunner(verbosity=self.verbosity) result = self.testRunner.run(self.test) sys.exit(not result.wasSuccessful()) -- components: Library (Lib) files: unittest.py messages: 66651 nosy: acgetchell severity: normal status: open title: unittest.py sys.exit error type: behavior versions: Python 2.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10289/unittest.py __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2821 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2822] Quote-type recognition bug [badly fixed last time]
New submission from Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have a suggestion that would make the http://svn.python.org/view?rev=63068view=rev look ever more clear. It would be better to have this kind of error messages: expect = End of line while scanning string (string, line 1) and expect End of f... while scanning multi-line string (string, line 1) These messages really need to be clear, so putting EOF for example (which I really don't know what it stands for) is really mind-bending. But if changing EOL and EOF to their actual meaning would cause some problems, then this look nice as well: expect = EOL while scanning string (string, line 1) and expect EOF while scanning multi-line string (string, line 1) The first two proposals look more readable because I think that many people don't know what EOF stands for (they can guess for EOL though, but EOF is just mind-bending and wild guessing). I Googled and found no answer, so I actually don't know what that error message is saying to me. Also, it would be good, however, to remove the 'triple-quoted string literal' and name that simply as 'multi-line string'. Simple is better than complex. :) Mister Rossum, please give a go on that. I kindly ask you to choose from the above two options. Your proposal on that was made, yes... but I find the 'multi-line string' even better than 'triple-quoted string literal'. I would love to provide a patch but I don't know how it's made. -- messages: 66652 nosy: chester, gvanrossum severity: normal status: open title: Quote-type recognition bug [badly fixed last time] versions: 3rd party, Python 2.1.1, Python 2.1.2, Python 2.2, Python 2.2.1, Python 2.2.2, Python 2.2.3, Python 2.3, Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2822 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2822] Quote-type recognition bug [badly fixed last time]
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Stop bothering us. -- resolution: - invalid status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2822 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2819] Full precision summation
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This looks pretty good at first glance. Will review more throughly later this week. It does need docs and unittests. -- assignee: - rhettinger __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2819 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: rfc822 is replaced by None in the patch here; is that safe to do? Yes. That's what mailbox documentation says: Parameter factory is a callable object that accepts a file-like message representation [...] and returns a custom representation. If factory is None, MaildirMessage is used as the default message representation. Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2823] Report bug links
New submission from anatoly techtonik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It would be convenient to use links in the bottom of documentation pages for bugreporting that directly connect to bugtracker search form. I.e. Report bug on this page and Report bug in this module. -- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation, Documentation tools (Sphinx) messages: 66657 nosy: georg.brandl, techtonik severity: normal status: open title: Report bug links __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2823 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2823] Report bug links
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: -1. This would make a fairly pessimistic view of Python, making it sound as if reporting a bug is a primary thing that one might to do with it. -- nosy: +loewis __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2823 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2802] str.format() :n integer output
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Implemented in 2.6 as r63078. I'll port this to py3k shortly. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2802 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2775] Implement PEP 3108
Guilherme Polo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Patch regarding the move to tkinter package added. What this patch does * Moved lib-tk to tkinter and renamed modules according to PEP 3108 * Merged tkFileDialog into filedialog * Merged tkSimpleDialog into simpledialog * Updated imports in pydoc * Updated imports in idlelib * Updated imports in Tools and Demos * Changed lib-tk to tkinter at Makefile.pre.in * Removed TKPATH from Modules/Setup.dist * Removed references of lib-tk at PC/ What has to be done --- * Update iss script at PC/ to change lib-tk to tkinter * Update docs * stub modules ? Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10290/tkinter_package_and_fixes.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2775 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2824] zipfile to handle duplicate files in archive
New submission from anatoly techtonik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ZipFile allows to add the same file to archive twice. I bet it is not intended behavior for many users who would like to either replace file inside of archive or get runtime warning about duplicate file to be added. http://code.google.com/p/gvn/issues/detail?id=63 from zipfile import ZipFile zt=ZipFile(ziptest.zip,w) zt.write(ziptest.py) zt.write(ziptest.py) zt.close() -- components: Extension Modules messages: 1 nosy: techtonik severity: normal status: open title: zipfile to handle duplicate files in archive versions: Python 2.5 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2824 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2378] UnboundLocalError when trying to raise exceptions inside execfile
Nikolas Coukouma [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I can't reproduce this with r63075... -- nosy: +nikolasco __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2378 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2819] Full precision summation
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Some comments/questions: (1) It seems wasteful to wrap every addition in PyFPE_START/END_PROTECT, and to check for NaNs and infinities after every addition. I'd wrap the whole thing in a single PyFPE_START/END_PROTECT, replace _math_sum_add with an inline addition, and just let NaNs and Infs sort themselves out. If the result comes out finite (as it surely will in almost all applications), then all the summands were necessarily finite and there's nothing more to do. If the result comes out as an infinity or NaN, you need to decide whether it's appropriate to return a NaN, an infinity, or to raise OverflowError or ValueError. I'm not sure it's worth trying to do the right thing for all special value cases, but if you do want to follow 'spirit of IEEE 754' rules for special values, they should look something like this: (1) if the summands include a NaN, return a NaN (2) else if the summands include infinities of both signs, raise ValueError, (3) else if the summands include infinities of only one sign, return infinity with that sign, (4) else (all summands are finite) if the result is infinite, raise OverflowError. (The result can never be a NaN if all summands are finite.) Note that some sums involving overflow won't be computed correctly: e.g. [1e308, 1e308, -1e308] will likely sum to infinity instead of returning 1e308. I don't see any easy way around this, and it's probably not worth worrying about. (2) The algorithm is only guaranteed to work correctly assuming IEEE 754 semantics. Python currently doesn't insist on IEEE 754 floating point, so what should happen on non IEEE-754 machines? (3) Rather than duplicating the math module code in cmathmodule.c, why not have the complex version simply sum real parts and imaginary parts separately, using a version of the code that's already in mathmodule.c? -- nosy: +marketdickinson __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2819 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2825] Quote-type recognition bug [got a patch!]
New submission from Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is a patch I made to make this messages clear now. I hope you like it. -- files: test_eof.patch keywords: patch messages: 4 nosy: chester severity: normal status: open title: Quote-type recognition bug [got a patch!] Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10291/test_eof.patch __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2825 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2378] UnboundLocalError when trying to raise exceptions inside execfile
Pedro Werneck [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I get it with r63075, r63085, on Linux. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2378 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2819] Full precision summation
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: One more question: What are the use cases for an exact summation algorithm? That is, in what situations does one care about exactness rather than simply accuracy? I know that loss of accuracy is a problem in things like numeric integration routines, but something like Kahan summation (faster and simpler, but not exact) usually takes care of that. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2819 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Removed the last rfc822 reference from 3k's mailbox.py in r63091. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2825] Quote-type recognition bug [got a patch!]
Changes by Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +gvanrossum versions: +3rd party, Python 2.1.1, Python 2.1.2, Python 2.2, Python 2.2.1, Python 2.2.2, Python 2.2.3, Python 2.3, Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2825 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2809] string docstring doesn't mention that ' '.split() != ' '.split(' ')
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Okay, r63092 should satisfy you then. :) __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2809 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2250] rlcompleter raises Exception on bad input
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Committed code and doc patches as r63094. Thanks! -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - accepted status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2250 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2413] os.strerror does not check for out of range argument
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: IMO, the current behavior is the least problematic. It also mirrors the rest of Python's posix-wrapping calls: if something usable is returned, use it; if NULL is returned, raise an error. For most people, Unknown error XXX or Value error: strerror() argument out of range won't be much different in terms of user experience. Rejecting this patch. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - rejected status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2413 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2802] str.format() :n integer output
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Implemented in 3.0 as r63093. I'm closing this issue. I added the C code that does the grouping insertion as _PyString_InsertThousandsGrouping and _PyUnicode_InsertThousandsGrouping (in 3.0). This might be useful to others, although the API is fairly complicated. Mark Dickinson: For Decimal, you can probably get what you need from Lib/locale.py, although the function _group() is private. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2802 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Georg, any special reason for not removing rfc822 references from test_mailbox? That section of the patch was not merged. Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Okay, removed that too in r63096. Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2535] duplicate Misc.lower
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Committed as r63097. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - accepted status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2535 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2826] safe_substitute() and substitute()
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: First of all, you don't say which type these methods belong to. I assume you mean string.Template. What good would that be? Those extra 5 characters to type shouldn't be the problem. Many template strings have only defined keys, and it is a programming error if a key is not given or misspelled in the template. In this case, substitute() is the right function. Rejecting this RFE. -- nosy: +georg.brandl -gvanrossum resolution: - rejected status: open - closed type: - feature request versions: -3rd party, Python 2.1.1, Python 2.1.2, Python 2.2, Python 2.2.1, Python 2.2.2, Python 2.2.3, Python 2.3, Python 2.4, Python 2.5 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2826 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2814] Remove old classes from mailbox module
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I think we should add a deprecation warning for those classes in 2.6, right? As we're not removing the whole module, what's the right place to put that? On the __init__ method of each class? __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2814 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2814] Remove old classes from mailbox module
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I added a deprecation notice to the docs. That should be enough. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2814 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2821] unittest.py sys.exit error
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Can you elaborate how you get the printed exception? When running your code as a script under 2.5 or trunk, I don't get such a message. -- nosy: +georg.brandl __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2821 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2824] zipfile to handle duplicate files in archive
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I think a warning would be sensible here. The behavior is certainly not what I would expect. -- nosy: +alanmcintyre, georg.brandl __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2824 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1649238] potential clash with C++ in ceval.h
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Lowering priority. -- nosy: +georg.brandl priority: normal - low _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1649238 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1470548] Bugfix for #1470540 (XMLGenerator cannot output UTF-16)
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Won't this present backwards-compatibility problems if non-ASCII str content is written? -- nosy: +georg.brandl _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1470548 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2043] test_cl.py converted to unittest
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: test_cl was already changed not to run as an import side-effect; I don't think unittest is necessary here. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - rejected status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2043 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1713041] fix for 1712742: corrects pprint's handling of 'depth'
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: The test suite doesn't pass any longer when the patch is applied. -- nosy: +georg.brandl _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1713041 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2775] Implement PEP 3108
Changes by Andrews Patrick Rocha Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10292/symtable_removed_on_py3k.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2775 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2723] Truncate __len__() at sys.maxsize
Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Agreed, having it lie about the size is the WORST possible behavior because it will silently hide problems. Lets not do that. But I must've missed something, why can't __len__ return the correct value? Merely because range() is broken and might use it as input? Thats no excuse. Fix range(). -- nosy: +gregory.p.smith __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2723 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2723] Truncate __len__() at sys.maxsize
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. But I must've missed something, why can't __len__ return the correct value? The problem is the C signature of the sq_length slot: typedef Py_ssize_t (*lenfunc)(PyObject *); __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2723 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2827] IDLE 3.0a5 cannot handle UTF-8
New submission from Sven Siegmund [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have a source code which IDLE 3.0a5 cannot parse, but Python 3.0a5 can (also attached): #!/usr/bin/python # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- def načtiSlovník(zdroj='slovník.txt'): soubor = open(zdroj, mode='r', encoding='utf_8') řádky = soubor.readlines() for řádek in řádky: print(řádek, end='') načtiSlovník() # End of source code I have set up Default Source Encoding to UTF-8 in IDLE's general configuration. Still, when I open that source code and try to run it, IDLE complains about invalid character in identifier and highlights zdroj red in the first line (sic!). However, when I run the source code from command line (by python filename), it gets executed well and does what it shall do. I should probably add, that I have installed py3k:62932M, May 9 2008, 16:23:11 [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on win32. I use Windows XP SP 3. IDLE uses Tk version 8.4 -- components: IDLE files: czech-it.py messages: 66689 nosy: sven.siegmund severity: normal status: open title: IDLE 3.0a5 cannot handle UTF-8 type: compile error versions: Python 3.0 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10293/czech-it.py __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2827 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1685] linecache .updatecache fails on utf8 encoded files
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This should be fixed differently (directly applying the RE to bytes objects), but it needs a re that handles bytes first. -- assignee: - georg.brandl nosy: +georg.brandl priority: high - critical __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1685 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2825] Quote-type recognition bug [got a patch!]
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I though Georg already did this in r63068. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2825 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2825] Quote-type recognition bug [got a patch!]
Changes by Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: -gvanrossum resolution: - invalid status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2825 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1234985] using some_re.sub() often imports sre.__doc__
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: pattern.sub() imports the SRE Python module (to call its subx()) with PyImport_Import -- that C functions uses a dummy list ['__doc__'] to get the correct module for dotted import paths. The import of an additional module is gone now that re is really called re. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - wont fix status: open - closed _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1234985 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue678464] Docs don't define sequence-ness very well
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- type: - feature request Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue678464 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
