[issue9086] Wrong linking terminology in windows FAQ
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment: I agree with John: this paragraph is technically incorrect. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms681914%28v=VS.85%29.aspx for an official definition of the relevant terms. I vaguely recall objecting to that text when it got added, but in the discussion, it would have meant that I would have to rewrite the text myself, which I didn't want to (maybe I'm confusing this with something else, though). In any case, it would be possible to actually use static linking as well for Python. There are currently no VS projects defined to create a static library, and such a thing couldn't dynamically load modules (which might not be necessary for embedding). I agree with Terry that it would be best if John would produce some text he's happy with. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9086 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7673] audioop: check that length is a multiple of the size
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: It seems you introduced a reference leak, Victor. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2010-July/094756.html -- priority: release blocker - high resolution: fixed - accepted status: closed - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7673 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7673] audioop: check that length is a multiple of the size
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: Fixed in r82527 (py3k), r82528 (release31-maint). -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7673 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4640] optparse doesn’t disallow adding one-da sh long options (“-option”)
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: David committed a unit test in r82233. Who wants to propose a patch now? -- resolution: - accepted stage: unit test needed - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4640 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9145] test_coercion fails in refleak runs
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - flox components: -Library (Lib) resolution: - accepted stage: - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9145 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5672] Implement a way to change the python process name
Daniele Varrazzo p...@develer.com added the comment: Hello everybody, I've finished porting the module to Python 3, so I think it's a good starting point for considering its inclusion into the stdlib. The source is already out; tomorrow I'll test for regressions on mac osx and release the package. I'm not going to champion a PEP for its inclusion though, as I'm not the right person to do what described in the pep approval process. I have no objection if somebody wanted to push for it anyway and to fulfill the requirements outlined by Martin. Marcelo, I think it's up to you :) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5672 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9012] Separate compilation of time and datetime modules
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment: this breaks the build if the time and datetime extensions are built statically into the python interpreter. The build fails with a link error; adding the _time extension to Modules/Setup.dist @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ #cmath cmathmodule.c _math.c # -lm # complex math library functions #math mathmodule.c _math.c # -lm # math library functions, e.g. sin() #_struct _struct.c # binary structure packing/unpacking +#_time _time.c # # segregated code shared between time and datetime modules #time timemodule.c # -lm # time operations and variables #operator operator.c # operator.add() and similar goodies #_weakref _weakref.c # basic weak reference support you get another link error: libpython3.2.a(config.o):(.data+0x58): undefined reference to `PyInit__time' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status because _time isn't a proper extension. raising the severity as this is a regression -- nosy: +doko priority: normal - high status: closed - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9012 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9012] Separate compilation of time and datetime modules
Changes by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: -- resolution: fixed - ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9012 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9012] Separate compilation of time and datetime modules
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment: please find attached a patch to build as a statically linked extension, registering the empty _time module. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17853/time.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9012 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4640] optparse doesn’t disallow adding one-da sh long options (“-option”)
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: I didn't commit a unit test for the revised subject, my unit test was for the previous misunderstood diagnosis. So a unit test for disallowing single dash long options in add_option is still needed. Note that this appears (at least on a quick test) to apply to argparse as well. I've left 2.7 and 3.1 in versions, but I'm not 100% sure this should be backported since it is a behavior change. But it's hard to imagine working code using this (does it even do anything, or is the single dash option just silently ignored?) -- nosy: +bethard versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4640 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8910] Write a text file explaining why Lib/test/data exists
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Benjamin, is it too late? -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8910 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7829] dis module documentation gives no indication of the dangers of bytecode inspection
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7829 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9012] Separate compilation of time and datetime modules
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: _time.c is not supposed to be compiled into an extension. It is similar to _math.c - if you add a line _math _math.c to Setup, you get a similar compile error. What needs to be done, however, is to add _time.c to time and datetime lines. See issue9012a.diff. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17854/issue9012a.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9012 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9145] test_coercion fails in refleak runs
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment: Fixed with r82529 -- resolution: accepted - fixed stage: needs patch - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9145 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9012] Separate compilation of time and datetime modules
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment: doesn't work: ranlib libpython3.2.a Modules/_time.o: In function `_PyTime_DoubleToTimet': /scratch/packages/python/3.2/python3.2-3.2~~20100704/build-shared/../Modules/_time.c:11: multiple definition of `_PyTime_DoubleToTimet' Modules/_time.o:/scratch/packages/python/3.2/python3.2-3.2~~20100704/build-shared/../Modules/_time.c:11: first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status ln: accessing `libpython3.2.so.1.0': No such file or directory make[1]: *** [libpython3.2.so] Error 1 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9012 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9012] Separate compilation of time and datetime modules
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: Matthias, does building both the math and cmath modules statically into the interpreter fail in a similar manner? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9012 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8892] 2to3 fails with assertion failure on from itertools import *
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- assignee: - benjamin.peterson nosy: +benjamin.peterson stage: - unit test needed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8892 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1506122] Add compose function to the functools
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Gregory, any update on this? Maybe you can poll python-ideas. Collin, any download stats and feedback on your package? -- nosy: +merwok ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1506122 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9012] Separate compilation of time and datetime modules
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment: yes, same issue with math/cmath. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9012 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9012] Separate compilation of time and datetime modules
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks. Looks like we need a general solution to the problem of shared (non-module) dependencies in modules. So all that's needed is a way to stop _time.o showing up twice in MODOBJS in the Makefile, right? (For some reason, ranlib on OS X doesn't seem to have any problem with multiply-defined symbols; obviously Linux is different.) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9012 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8472] itertools.filterfalse() function missing
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- nosy: +d...@python ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8472 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9141] Allow objects to decide if they can be collected by GC
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com added the comment: I don't understand the tp_del / tp_dealloc argument here. This is really not the concern of gc. Gc only goes and finds unreachable objects, and if they are deemend collectable, makes them go away by clearing their references. GC only cares that during the final release of any objects in a reference cycle, no non-trivial code may run (for various technical reasons). So, objects deemed sensitive in this way, are left alone (and put in gc.garbage instead). GC has no other knowledge of how objects behave, if or when any finalizers are called. The only thing gc does is calling Py_DECREF (through the tp_clear slot). Everything else is up to the objects. The intent of this patch is for objects themselves to be able to provide better information to GC as to whether they are too sensitive to be cleared by GC, rather than GC relying solely on the presence of a __del__ method, or using the builtin special case knowledbe for PyGen objects. Whether finalizers are called from tp_del or tp_dealloc is beyond the scope of the gc module or, indeed, this patch. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9141 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9153] Run tests and demos as part of the test suite
New submission from Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: I propose than tests and demos be run during the test suite, as a sanity check to prevent them getting badly out of sync (see “Signs of neglect thread?” starting at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/101092.html) Is this a good idea? -- components: Demos and Tools, Tests messages: 109227 nosy: merwok priority: low severity: normal status: open title: Run tests and demos as part of the test suite versions: Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9153 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9153] Run tests and demos as part of the test suite
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I propose that tests and demos be run during the test suite, as a sanity check to prevent them from getting badly out of sync (see “Signs of neglect thread?” starting at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/101092.html) Is this a good idea? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9153 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9153] Run tests and demos as part of the test suite
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9153 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9141] Allow objects to decide if they can be collected by GC
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: GC only cares that during the final release of any objects in a reference cycle, no non-trivial code may run (for various technical reasons). So, objects deemed sensitive in this way, are left alone (and put in gc.garbage instead). Which is really the problem, and why you should prefer tp_dealloc over tp_del. (unless you want gc.garbage to fill up too easily) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9141 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8892] 2to3 fails with assertion failure on from itertools import *
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment: Fixed in r82530. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8892 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9149] colorsys.py function rgb_to_hls
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: I think the arguments to rgb_to_hls are supposed to be floats in the range [0.0, 1.0]. -- nosy: +mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9149 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9128] Parser module fails to validate class decorators correctly.
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9128 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9152] Dead code in datetime module
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: Committed in r82533. -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9152 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9128] Parser module fails to validate class decorators correctly.
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: Fixed in r82532 (release27-maint) and r82534 (release26-maint). -- versions: -Python 2.6, Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9128 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7582] Use ISO timestamp in diff.py
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- title: [patch] diff.py to use iso timestamp - Use ISO timestamp in diff.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7582 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue444582] Finding programs in PATH, addition to os
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Is a “which” function that useful, since we have os.exec* functions that search the PATH for us? It seems to me that wanting to know the exact path of an executable is a specialized need, and that adding this function would make beginners use it instead of the os.exec* family. -- nosy: +merwok ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue444582 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9152] Dead code in datetime module
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: Merged in 3.1 in r82536. -- stage: commit review - committed/rejected versions: +Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9152 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9128] Parser module fails to validate class decorators correctly.
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: and in r82537 (py3k), r82539 (release31-maint). -- resolution: - fixed stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9128 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9153] Run tests and demos as part of the test suite
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- nosy: +holdenweb ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9153 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7962] Demo and Tools need to be tested and pruned
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I’m making this a meta-bug to record the evaluation of demos and tools, in followup with the thread “Signs of neglect?” started on http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/101092.html. Some of them have already been adopted or deleted. Please add yourself to Misc/maintainers.rst when you adopt one. I also propose adding either a section in the README or a new README.removed file to list the deletions; there are probably people out there using these tools (maybe not demos, though), so it’s more polite to tell them “metaclasses is removed, see this doc for modern built-in metaclasses” than to just remove the file. Regarding testing, please comment on #9153. -- dependencies: +Demo/embed/demo.c use of PySys_SetArgv() is invalid, Use ISO timestamp in diff.py, replace dist/src/Tools/scripts/which.py with tmick's which, svnmerge errors in msgfmt.py nosy: +holdenweb title: Demo/ directory needs to be tested and pruned - Demo and Tools need to be tested and pruned ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9083] At least some Tools utilities are still Python 2
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I opened a bug about testing demos and tools: #9153. There was already a bug about cleaning up demos, #7962, so I’ve made it into a meta-bug for demos and tools, superseding this one. Steve, I’m adding you to the nosy there, but I don’t feel confident enough to raise the severity or add other people to nosy. -- nosy: +merwok resolution: - duplicate stage: needs patch - committed/rejected status: open - closed superseder: - Demo and Tools need to be tested and pruned versions: -Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9083 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9118] help() on a property descriptor launches interactive help
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: Committed in r82547. I am leaving it open to decide whether this is a 3.1-backport candidate. Also I am not sure this is NEWS-worthy. Jack, Does this address your issue? Note that help(X.foo.fset) will still not return help on X.foo, but it will make it obvious that X.foo.fset is None. -- stage: commit review - committed/rejected versions: +Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9118 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9141] Allow objects to decide if they can be collected by GC
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com added the comment: I'm confused, Antoine. _I_ am not preferring anything. I am not modifying the way finalizers are called. I'm merely providing a way for objects to signal that they _have_ (or don't have) non-trivial finalizers. A finalizer _may_ be tp_del, but it may be any code that is called as part of tp_dealloc(). This patch allows an object to say: Calling tp_dealloc() is currently unsafe from a gc.collect() run. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9141 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9141] Allow objects to decide if they can be collected by GC
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: A finalizer _may_ be tp_del, but it may be any code that is called as part of tp_dealloc(). This patch allows an object to say: Calling tp_dealloc() is currently unsafe from a gc.collect() run. Well, I don't know what you mean. tp_dealloc should always be safe and is never checked for by the GC. By the way, tp_del isn't even documented, which reinforces my point that it's not really for use by third-party extension types. I think we are reaching the point where, if you want this to happen, you should ask for opinions on python-dev, because I really don't understand which problem you are trying to solve. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9141 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9153] Run tests and demos as part of the test suite
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Many demos already include a self-test:
$ grep '^def test(' Demo/*/*.py
Demo/classes/Complex.py:def test():
Demo/classes/Dates.py:def test(firstyear, lastyear):
Demo/classes/Range.py:def test():
Demo/classes/Vec.py:def test():
Demo/parser/test_parser.py:def test():
Demo/pdist/FSProxy.py:def test():
Demo/pdist/RCSProxy.py:def test():
Demo/pdist/cmdfw.py:def test():
Demo/pdist/cvslib.py:def test():
Demo/pdist/cvslock.py:def test():
Demo/rpc/mountclient.py:def test():
Demo/rpc/nfsclient.py:def test():
Demo/rpc/rnusersclient.py:def test():
Demo/rpc/rpc.py:def test():
Demo/scripts/markov.py:def test():
Demo/sockets/gopher.py:def test():
Demo/threads/Generator.py:def test():
Demo/threads/sync.py:def test():
Demo/turtle/tdemo_penrose.py:def test(l=200, n=4, fun=sun, startpos=(0,0),
th=2):
I think the first step should be to run those from regrtest. The next step
would be to convert adhoc test functions into doctests or unit tests as
appropriate.
Step zero, however, should be to decide which demos are worth keeping and which
should be removed.
--
nosy: +belopolsky
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9153
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7962] Demo and Tools need to be tested and pruned
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: I fixed Dates.py. See issue9151. I also committed a minimal fix for Complex.py in r82524. -- dependencies: +Demo/classes/Dates.py does not work in 3.x nosy: +belopolsky ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8472] itertools.filterfalse() function missing
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment: Thanks, applied the suggestion in r82548. -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8472 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7962] Demo and Tools need to be tested and pruned
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: I fixed Rev.py in r82550, but I don't think it is worth keeping in the current form. Maybe it can be replaced with a pure python reimplementation of builtins.reversed. Note that slicing does not work for Rev: r = Rev([1,2,3]) r[:] Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module File Demo/classes/Rev.py, line 69, in __getitem__ return self.forw[-(j + 1)] TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'slice' and 'int' -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7962] Demo and Tools need to be tested and pruned
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: Fixed Range.py in r82551. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9141] Allow objects to decide if they can be collected by GC
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com added the comment: tp_del() is generally invoked by tp_dealloc(). See for example typeobject.c:849. gc.collect() never invokes tp_del() directy, that is left for the objects themselves (as part of tp_dealloc()) Now, gc already knows that if tp_del is present, it cannot cause break the cycle, (for various technical reasons, one of them being that tp_del would be invoked with various dependency objects already nerfed by tp_clear()). But this is not always enough: 1) it may be too pessimistic. Sometimes the tp_del method doesn't do anything significant, or isn't even called, depending on runtime state, so it is safe for gc to clear the object (see for example genobject.c:30). 2) Sometimes finalization behaviour is not defined by a tp_del method at all, but rather some custom code in tp_dealloc. All this patch does, is to generalize the mechanism already provided for genobject.c (by PyGen_NeedsFinalizing()), to any object: Any object can signal to gc that: a) it is ok to collect a cycle with me in it, or b) no, it is unsafe to do so. With this patch in place, PyGen_NeedsFinalizing() no longer needs to be a special case in gcmodule.c. Yes, I'll send a message to python-dev. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9141 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9151] Demo/classes/Dates.py does not work in 3.x
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- stage: patch review - committed/rejected ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9151 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9151] Demo/classes/Dates.py does not work in 3.x
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- resolution: accepted - fixed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9151 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9141] Allow objects to decide if they can be collected by GC
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: All this patch does, is to generalize the mechanism already provided for genobject.c (by PyGen_NeedsFinalizing()), to any object: Any object can signal to gc that: a) it is ok to collect a cycle with me in it, or b) no, it is unsafe to do so. With this patch in place, PyGen_NeedsFinalizing() no longer needs to be a special case in gcmodule.c. Adding an API function and an additional traversal pass to the GC just for the sake of removing a special case doesn't seem reasonable to me. That's why I'm asking what specific problem you are trying to solve. (rather than simply trying to make things nicer) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9141 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7962] Demo and Tools need to be tested and pruned
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment: I should note here that I fixed Demo/md5test/md5driver.py in r82351 (py3k) and r82352 (release31-maint). -- nosy: +brian.curtin ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9118] help() on a property descriptor launches interactive help
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: The doc says that help takes one optional arg: No arg: interactive help system String: interpret as name of something Any other object: help page for that object [by implication, multiple args: TypeError] Not returning help for None is a bug, so I say yes, backport, including to 2.6/7 if they have same bug. I think the OP's example, which turns on the fact that None is an object that can be attached to any target, and not just a name, illustrates the bugginess of the current behavior. If NEWS includes a detailed list of bugfixes, then this could be included. If not, no. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9118 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9153] Run tests and demos as part of the test suite
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Yep, my idea was to add a really thin regrtest integration layer for these self-tests (which have no reason to move to Lib/tests, really), e.g. add a tests.test_demos_tools module that would import all these test functions and stuff them into a unittest test suite. I did not detail that in my report since I wanted first an agreement on the idea (i.e. a core dev setting resolution to accepted :) -- type: - feature request ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9153 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9130] Parser module fails on short relative imports
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: Fixed in revisions r82543, r82546, r82552, r82553, r82554. Leaving open because I'm suspicious that the parser module isn't handling relative imports with more than three dots correctly in py3k (since ... gets parsed as an ellipsis token). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9130 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9130] Parser module fails on short relative imports
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: Ellipsis token validation fixed in r82555 (py3k), r82556 (release31-maint). -- resolution: - fixed stage: commit review - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9130 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9095] patchcheck should handle extraneous whitespace in .rst files
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Please apply the refactor patch in #8912 -- dependencies: +`make patchcheck` should check the whitespace of .c/.h files versions: +Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9095 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8999] Add Mercurial support to patchcheck
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: [...] using a simple hg status of the working copy will not do the right thing I think all of these workflows share a step where you have edits in your working directory that are not in the working dir’s parent changeset. Thus, I argue that hg status is helpful in a majority of cases. In the long term, it may be better to make patchcheck work on diffs rather than $vcs status (that will be an interesting challenge for me), or something else depending on the future dev policy. That is explicitly what I’m not doing here: I’m doing a straightforward patch to add support for Mercurial in a way that just mimics Subversion, doesn’t mandate one workflow, and doesn’t cost anything. Now it’s up to you to commit this or set resolution to “later”, I won’t argue further or complain. :) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8999 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9154] Parser module doesn't understand function annotations.
New submission from Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com: Python 3.2a0 (py3k:82529M, Jul 4 2010, 17:35:10) [GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5659)] on darwin Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import parser [38213 refs] parser.sequence2st(parser.suite(def f(a:int) - int: pass).totuple()) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module parser.ParserError: VALIDATION FAILURE: report this to the maintainer! [38264 refs] -- assignee: mark.dickinson components: Extension Modules messages: 109256 nosy: mark.dickinson priority: normal severity: normal stage: unit test needed status: open title: Parser module doesn't understand function annotations. type: behavior versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9154 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9132] Documentation for comparing dictionaries is out of date
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: On the 'patch' keyword: I thought the same as you (only for diff) until yesterday morning when Brett Cannon specifically told me that I should also set it for in-message text patches. This was in the context of him having not noticed for months (until I pinged him) that I had included a text patch in a message for an issue assigned to him, because he skims messages and looks for the keyword and other header changes. So until a 'higher' tracker authority tell me differently, I am following his direction. I am also highlighting the actual patch in the message to make it easy to find. The current compare equal if and only if their sorted (key, value) lists compare equal. [4] was written when all objects were comparable and when dict == dict *was* written that way (according to [5]). The footnote was added to assure people that the new internal implementation was faster (ie, set comparison via hash lookup) than it once had been. For a long time, that definition of dict equality has been invalid because it cannot be implemented that way; the definition is even more meaningless in Python3. So is footnote [4] saying that the meaningless definition is not the implementation. Both [4] and [5] are ancient fossils referring back to Python1. Without looking, I am confident that the actual implementation is O(1) if the dicts are unequal in size and an O(n) (key,value) set comparison if they are equal in size. My proposed revision is intended to imply that. Note that Python did not have sets when the sorted list definition was written. Also note that there is no footnote attached to set comparison (which once could have also been defined in terms of sorted lists). Dicts are sets (of pairs), not unsorted lists (of pairs) and the current docs should reflect that. The language def makes no guarantees about implementation efficiency. In 13 years of watching c.l.p/python-list, I have not seen any particular concern about dict comparison that would warrant special notice. Rather, people worry about the big-O behavior of building large lists and dicts of millions of items. The sometimes need persuading that construction is more efficient than they might imagine. That is about the only thing I can think of for which an efficiency note might be a good idea. 'Comparisons other than equality testing' include 'is' and 'in'. They work for dictionaries as expected, which is to say, as identify and containment testing, as for everything else. They do not raise TypeError. So the statement that implies that they do is not correct. PATCH REVISION: The suggested Order comparision raise TypeError. has spelling and agreement errors in 'comparision' and should be Order comparisons raise TypeError. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9096] importlib doesn't handle valid marshalled data with invalid semantics
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: This was fixed in r82523. -- resolution: accepted - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9096 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for RichComparisons
New submission from Demur Rumed junkm...@hotmail.com: Currently, COMPARE_OP is burdened by a needless, and unorthogonal, extra layer of indirection. I've modified it to only handle the rich comparison case, moving the other five cases to BINARY_IN, BINARY_NOT_IN, BINARY_IS, BINARY_IS_NOT, and BINARY_EXC_MATCH To consider is inlining the POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE POP_TOP which always follow BINARY_EXC_MATCH -- components: Interpreter Core files: cmpoppatch.diff keywords: patch messages: 109259 nosy: serprex priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Reserve COMPARE_OP for RichComparisons type: performance versions: Python 3.2, Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17855/cmpoppatch.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons
Changes by Demur Rumed junkm...@hotmail.com: -- title: Reserve COMPARE_OP for RichComparisons - Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9132] Documentation for comparing dictionaries is out of date
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Thanks for the explanation of the patch keyword. Its description (click on “Keywords”) is indeed generic (“contains patch”), http://www.python.org/dev/patches/ should probably say it too. I don’t have enough knowledge to make a useful comment on the rest of your reply. Other people most certainly will. I think two of my remarks are not addressed by your reply: - Is the term “order comparisons” used in the doc? If not, its meaning is non-obvious, and I’d like to find something clearer. - Testing with “is” is called identity testing, “in” is membership or containement testing. Where are they called “comparisons”? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: Any chance you could regenerate the patch without all the unnecessary whitespace changes? It's kinda hard to read right now. -- nosy: +mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons
Changes by Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net: -- nosy: +belopolsky ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons
Changes by Demur Rumed junkm...@hotmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17856/cmpoppatch2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5288] tzinfo objects with sub-minute offsets are not supported (e.g. UTC+05:53:28)
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: I am attaching a rough patch which removes timedelta - int minutes - timedelta round trips from utcoffset handling code. I think the result is an improvement, but needs more polishing. Mark, Do you think this is worth pursuing? I am not intending to add support for sub-minute offsets yet, just pass offsets around as timedeltas internally without unnecessary conversions to int and back. -- keywords: -easy, patch nosy: +mark.dickinson Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17857/issue5288.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5288 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue834840] Unhelpful error message from cgi module
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment: Could a CGI expert pick this up, failing that why not simply close it as opened nearely 7 years ago. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue834840 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4727] pickle/copyreg doesn't support keyword only arguments in __new__
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment: http://bugs.python.org/issue1398 has already been fixed and closed. http://bugs.python.org/issue4331 is still open and has seen activity as recently as 2010-02-23, so can this be closed or must it remain open? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4727 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4727] pickle/copyreg doesn't support keyword only arguments in __new__
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: Please keep this open. This issue is separate from pickling partial objects. -- nosy: +belopolsky ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4727 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4727] pickle/copyreg doesn't support keyword only arguments in __new__
Changes by Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net: -- stage: - needs patch versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4727 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4679] Fork + shelve causes shelve corruption and backtrace
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment: Hi Alex, Looks like nothing will happen with this unless you do something yourself. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4679 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2830] Copy cgi.escape() to html
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment: I'm guessing that this has simply slipped under the radar. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2830 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8912] `make patchcheck` should check the whitespace of .c/.h files
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: Committed in r82567. I also cleaned up the output slightly so that N file(s) pluralizes file properly based on N. Also now list what files have their whitespace fixed. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8912] `make patchcheck` should check the whitespace of .c/.h files
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8912 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4679] Fork + shelve causes shelve corruption and backtrace
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: The wikisource file in the report is no longer available, but with latest wikisource and python 2.7, $ curl http://download.wikimedia.org/enwikisource/latest/enwikisource-latest-pages-articles.xml.bz2| bzip2 -cd | ./python.exe convert.py /tmp 8388608 went through first 50MiB without an error. I am not sure I'll have the patience to run this to completion, but it looks like this is out of date. -- nosy: +belopolsky resolution: - out of date stage: - unit test needed status: open - pending ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4679 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3461] smtplib does not fully support IPv6 in EHLO
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment: I intended testing this but the patch file appears to have a dangling else at the bottom, or am I missing something? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3461 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4968] Clarify inspect.iscallable method docs
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment: Has this issue simply slipped under the radar? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2830] Copy cgi.escape() to html
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: Yep since it is not a critical change. If someone came up with a patch to move the code and docs over, make cgi.escape use the moved code, and add a PendingDeprecationWarning then it would get done. -- keywords: +easy priority: normal - low ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2830 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2830] Copy cgi.escape() to html
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org: -- versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2830 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5023] Segfault in datetime.time.strftime(%z)
Eric Wald pythoni...@brainshell.org added the comment: Reproduced again in version 2.7rc2; I had thought that it went away, but it turns out that --with-pydebug hides the problem. Compiling GDB now. -- status: pending - open versions: +Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5023 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9132] Documentation for comparing dictionaries is out of date
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
I intentionally began my first post with The RefMan section is 5.9.
Comparisons. Look there, particularly the definition of comp_operator.
In this context, I think 'order comparison' is pretty clearly a comparison with
an order operator, '' and ''. But fine with me if the editor want to list
them explicitly.
POSSIBLE PATCH ADDITION: ('', '=', '', '=')
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9132
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7829] dis module documentation gives no indication of the dangers of bytecode inspection
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: I believe Brett meant to leave this open until he finished it by backporting to 2.7 (which is now reopened for patches). Otherwise, it might get forgotten. Sidenote: this is the issue I referred to in #9132 re the 'patch' keyword. -- status: closed - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7829 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7829] dis module documentation gives no indication of the dangers of bytecode inspection
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 17:01, Terry J. Reedy rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: I believe Brett meant to leave this open until he finished it by backporting to 2.7 (which is now reopened for patches). Otherwise, it might get forgotten. Exactly right, Terry. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7829 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons
Demur Rumed junkm...@hotmail.com added the comment: I've attached the original patch without whitespace, and am also including modifications to this portion of the interpreter which remove ROT_FOUR, DUP_TOPX while adding ROT_THREE_TWO, DUP_TOP_TWO, DUP_ROT_THREE. I've seen a 5% speed increase with timeit.Timer(a[0]+=0,a=[0]) Also modified the optimizer to reject code with a size over 32767 instead of 32760. That's most likely a useless modification which may be preferred ignored -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17858/cmpoprotdup.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons
Demur Rumed junkm...@hotmail.com added the comment: I've attached the original patch without whitespace, and am also including modifications to this portion of the interpreter which remove ROT_FOUR, DUP_TOPX while adding ROT_THREE_TWO, DUP_TOP_TWO, DUP_ROT_THREE. I've seen a 4% speed increase with timeit.Timer(a[0]+=0,a=[0]) Also modified the optimizer to reject code with a size over 32767 instead of 32760. That's most likely a useless modification which may be preferred ignored -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17859/cmpoprotdup.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons
Changes by Demur Rumed junkm...@hotmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file17859/cmpoprotdup.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9156] socket._fileobject: read raises AttributeError when closed in another thread
New submission from Mathias Panzenböck grosser.meister.mo...@gmx.net:
When you open a socket._fileobject through sock.makefile('rb') or similar and
you read blocking in one thread and close the file object from another thread
the reading thread gets an AttributeError. This is because the close method
sets the underlying fileobject._sock member to None and the read/readline/...
methods call recv on this member without checking if its None. I think the
_sock member should not be set to None at all but a flag should be set that
this file object is closed.
For the time being I use the bugfix I attached and therefore do not call
sock.makefile('rb') but FileObject(sock, 'rb'). FileObject is a subtype of
socket._fileobject that overrides the close method and closed property.
I don't know if this bug persists in 2.7 or 3.x. I still use Fedora 12 and that
comes with Python 2.6.2.
--
components: Library (Lib)
files: FileObject.py
messages: 109281
nosy: panzi
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: socket._fileobject: read raises AttributeError when closed in another
thread
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.6
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17860/FileObject.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9156
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons
Demur Rumed junkm...@hotmail.com added the comment: Fixed regression in ROT_THREE_TWO and a missed DUP_TOP2 - DUP_TOP_TWO. Now there are only the odd segfaults -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17861/cmpoprotdup2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9157] Allow inspection of used decorators on a function
New submission from Mitar mmi...@gmail.com: Sometimes it is useful to be able to check which decorators are already applied to a function, especially when you are constructing them dynamically. I am proposing that for all decorators in Python would be suggested that they maintain a list of used decorators on a function. It is most useful when all decorators do this. It is the same reasoning why `inspect` module is in Python - to be able to inspect Python structures, to have this possibility. If you do not want it then you do can use Python structures as they were given to you. But you have an option to inspect them. And I would like the same to see from decorators. It is not really so important that all decorators update this. If they would not then they would be hidden from inspection. But if developer wants to use inspection then he would choose such decorators which use this (or change them in this way). If all default Python's decorators would already be such it would be much easier to use them. This could be implement by changing `wraps` function to pass over also the (for example) `__DECORATORS__` attribute of a function to a wrapped function and add this new decorator to a list, `__DECORATORS__`. By default in a list ids of decorators would be maintained, but this could be overridden by `id` attribute of `wraps` function so that decorator can represent itself in some special way, for example as a tuple of its id and some significant parameters. -- messages: 109283 nosy: mitar priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Allow inspection of used decorators on a function type: feature request ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9157 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9136] RuntimeError when profiling Decimal
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment: +try: +dc = DefaultContext +except NameError: +pass + +self.prec = dc.prec if prec is None else prec I don't quite understand the point of catching NameError here, but it looks like if it is caught, it will just be raised by the next line because dc will not be set. Also, I am not sure ternary expressions are a big readability win here, but if you want to keep them, consider self.prec = prec if prec is not None else dc.prec -- nosy: +belopolsky ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9136 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9158] PyArg_ParseTuple y* documentation is incorrect
New submission from Terrence Cole terre...@zettabytestorage.com: The documented C type for y* should be [Py_buffer], not [Py_buffer *], as with the documentation for z* and the convention followed by the other types. I'm not sure what 'type' this issue should have. I've set it at 'crash' initially, since that's how the bug manifested for me. -- assignee: d...@python components: Documentation files: PyArgs_ParseTuple_ystar_doc_fix.patch keywords: patch messages: 109285 nosy: d...@python, terrence priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: PyArg_ParseTuple y* documentation is incorrect type: crash versions: Python 3.2 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17862/PyArgs_ParseTuple_ystar_doc_fix.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9158 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9158] PyArg_ParseTuple y* documentation is incorrect
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +haypo stage: - patch review type: crash - feature request ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9158 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7989] Add pure Python implementation of datetime module to CPython
Tim Peters tim.pet...@gmail.com added the comment: ... Another is tzinfo attribute of time. With time t, t.utcoffset() is kid of useless given that you cannot subtract it from t Sure you can - but you have to write your code to do time arithmetic. The time implementation does so under the covers when two aware time objects are compared: If both [time] comparands are aware and have different tzinfo members, the comparands are first adjusted by subtracting their UTC offsets (obtained from self.utcoffset()). and unless tzinfo is a fixed offset timezone, there is not enough information in t to compute the offset to begin with. The docs _suggest_ that tzinfo.utcoffset(x, None) return the standard UTC offset, but in the end it's up to the tzinfo subclass designer to decide what they want an aware time object to return as an offset. Do you have any historical insight on this one? History has nothing to do with it ;-) There are several uses spelled out in the docs. In addition to aware time comparison (mentioned above): - Maintaining the datetime invariant d == datetime.combine(d.date(), d.timetz()) requires that an aware datetime's tzinfo member be attached to at least one of the date and time projections, and since raw dates are always naive, that leaves the time projection as the only choice. - Various string format operations use an aware time object's tzinfo member to incorporate time zone information - at least time.isoformat() and time.strftime(). That said, would have been fine by me if the naive versus aware distinction had been limited to datetime objects (i.e., if plain date and plain time objects had no notion of time zone). If you need to know why time objects really support being aware, you'll have to ask Guido ;-) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7989 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9155] Reserve COMPARE_OP for rich comparisons
Changes by Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net: -- assignee: - rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9155 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9159] asyncore.file_wrapper does not register its fd to socket_map
New submission from kimhyunkang kimhyunk...@gmail.com:
In current stable python 2.6, the test code below does nothing, which is
inconsistent with other default dispatcher's behavior.
import asyncore
class test_reader(asyncore.file_wrapper)
def writable(self):
return False
def handle_read(self):
print self.recv(4096)
f = open('test.dat', 'r')
reader = test_reader(f.fileno())
asyncore.loop()
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 109287
nosy: kimhyunkang
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: asyncore.file_wrapper does not register its fd to socket_map
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9159
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3461] smtplib does not fully support IPv6 in EHLO
Derek Morr derekm...@psu.edu added the comment: You're right. My mistake when I made the patch. I've attached a new one without the trailing else -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17863/smtplib.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3461 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9160] Documentation link of 3.2 not working at docs.python.org
New submission from Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com: This link: http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/ Isn't working. I have always used it to see the latest documentation from 3.2, and it is linked in the left-hand side of the screen on docs.python.org as Python 3.2 (in development) under Docs for other versions if you're, for example here: http://docs.python.org/py3k/ -- assignee: d...@python components: Documentation messages: 109289 nosy: d...@python, eliben priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Documentation link of 3.2 not working at docs.python.org versions: Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9160 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9160] Documentation link of 3.2 not working at docs.python.org
Changes by Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com: -- type: - behavior ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9160 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9158] PyArg_ParseTuple y* documentation is incorrect
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
y* and z* result is a Py_buffer, but in C you have to pass a reference to the
result variable using result. Full example:
static PyObject *
getargs_y_star(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
{
Py_buffer buffer;
PyObject *bytes;
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, y*, buffer))
return NULL;
bytes = PyBytes_FromStringAndSize(buffer.buf, buffer.len);
PyBuffer_Release(buffer);
return bytes;
}
Another example: s format result is char* (and not char**). You also have to
pass a reference using :
static PyObject *
getargs_s(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
{
char *str;
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, s, str))
return NULL;
return PyBytes_FromString(str);
}
--
resolution: - invalid
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9158
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
