[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Attaching patch updated for backport to 2.7. In cases where the 2.7 language was substantively different, I preserved the 2.7 language (e.g. I preserved the reference to plain and long integers). I also added the lone 0 prefix for octals, which is a difference from 3.x: ``0o``/``0O``/``0``. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27351/issue-16036-5-27.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16036 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16092] test_recursion_limit in test_threading fails on Mac OS X in 3.2
New submission from Chris Jerdonek: The test_threading.ThreadingExceptionTests.test_recursion_limit test fails on Mac OS X with the standard compilation command: $ ./configure --with-pydebug make -j2 Python 3.2.3+ (3.2:247d3e3c08ca, Sep 29 2012, 23:45:43) [GCC 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.9.00)] on darwin Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5 == FAIL: test_recursion_limit (test.test_threading.ThreadingExceptionTests) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File .../cpython/Lib/test/test_threading.py, line 774, in test_recursion_limit self.assertEqual(p.returncode, 0, Unexpected error: + stderr.decode()) AssertionError: -10 != 0 : Unexpected error: -- This seems very similar to issue 14184 (copying the nosy list). -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 171613 nosy: chris.jerdonek, dk, meador.inge, ned.deily priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: test_recursion_limit in test_threading fails on Mac OS X in 3.2 type: behavior versions: Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16092 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16090] but is needed somewhere in http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3138/
Georg Brandl added the comment: I've gone through the PEP; I've found a few typos and fixed them, but no missing but. Sorry, but without a more specific location I don't think it's sensible to keep this open. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16090 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16093] Documentation: links to 3.3
New submission from Stefan Krah: A couple of links still need to be updated: http://docs.python.org/ Python 3.3 says in development and points to 3.4. http://docs.python.org/dev/ Python 3.3 is missing. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 171615 nosy: docs@python, skrah priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Documentation: links to 3.3 type: behavior versions: Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16093 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16091] changing sidebar links in http://docs.python.org/
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset eac9a50a2bdd by Georg Brandl in branch 'default': Closes #16091: fix the references to 3.3/3.4 in the Doc sidebar. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/eac9a50a2bdd -- nosy: +python-dev resolution: - fixed stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16091 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16093] Documentation: links to 3.3
Changes by Georg Brandl ge...@python.org: -- resolution: - duplicate status: open - closed superseder: - changing sidebar links in http://docs.python.org/ ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16093 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16092] test_recursion_limit in test_threading fails on Mac OS X in 3.2
Ned Deily added the comment: As far as I know, this is currently only an issue if you use the llvm-gcc-4.2 compiler on OS X to do a debug mode build. That compiler is no longer maintained by Apple and is known to miscompile Python 3.3 builds. There are checks in configure.ac for 3.3 to avoid using it. With Xcode 4, use clang instead (./configure ... CC=clang); for Xcode 3, use the standard gcc-4.2 (CC=gcc-4.2). -- resolution: - wont fix stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16092 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16034] bz2 module appears slower in Python 3.x versus Python 2.x
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Serhiy, would you be OK with me also including this patch in the bz2file package? Yes, of course. We can even speed up 1.5 times the reading of small chunks, if we inline _check_can_read() and _read_block(). The same approach is applied for LZMAFile. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16034 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16089] _elementtree causes segfault in GC
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com: -- components: +XML nosy: +eli.bendersky, flox ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16089 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16089] _elementtree causes segfault in GC
Stefan Krah added the comment: I can't reproduce this, so just a wild guess: Does the segfault still happen if you replace Py_XDECREF() with Py_CLEAR() in xmlparser_gc_clear()? -- nosy: +skrah ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16089 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15533] subprocess.Popen(cwd) documentation
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset abfaa4368263 by Chris Jerdonek in branch '3.2': Issue #15533: Clarify docs and add tests for subprocess.Popen()'s cwd argument. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/abfaa4368263 New changeset f66ff96f0030 by Chris Jerdonek in branch '3.3': Issue #15533: Merge fix from 3.2. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f66ff96f0030 New changeset 37f4aa15a1c6 by Chris Jerdonek in branch 'default': Issue #15533: Merge fix from 3.3. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/37f4aa15a1c6 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15533 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15533] subprocess.Popen(cwd) documentation
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: I will commit to 2.7 separately. -- versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15533 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15533] subprocess.Popen(cwd) documentation
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Two of the tests fail on at least some of the Windows bots. I am investigating. == ERROR: test_cwd_with_relative_arg (test.test_subprocess.ProcessTestCase) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File D:\Buildslave\3.2.moore-windows\build\lib\test\test_subprocess.py, line 222, in test_cwd_with_relative_arg self._assert_cwd(python_dir, rel_python, cwd=python_dir) File D:\Buildslave\3.2.moore-windows\build\lib\test\test_subprocess.py, line 195, in _assert_cwd **kwargs) File D:\Buildslave\3.2.moore-windows\build\lib\subprocess.py, line 745, in __init__ restore_signals, start_new_session) File D:\Buildslave\3.2.moore-windows\build\lib\subprocess.py, line 964, in _execute_child startupinfo) WindowsError: [Error 2] The system cannot find the file specified == ERROR: test_cwd_with_relative_executable (test.test_subprocess.ProcessTestCase) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File D:\Buildslave\3.2.moore-windows\build\lib\test\test_subprocess.py, line 240, in test_cwd_with_relative_executable cwd=python_dir) File D:\Buildslave\3.2.moore-windows\build\lib\test\test_subprocess.py, line 195, in _assert_cwd **kwargs) File D:\Buildslave\3.2.moore-windows\build\lib\subprocess.py, line 745, in __init__ restore_signals, start_new_session) File D:\Buildslave\3.2.moore-windows\build\lib\subprocess.py, line 964, in _execute_child startupinfo) WindowsError: [Error 2] The system cannot find the file specified http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Windows7%20SP1%203.2/builds/210 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15533 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11798] Test cases not garbage collected after run
Tom Wardill added the comment: Patch attached using setting test to None after execution. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +tomwardill Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27352/11798.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11798 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15505] unittest.installHandler incorrectly assumes SIGINT handler is set.
Changes by Tom Wardill t...@howrandom.net: -- nosy: +michael.foord ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15505 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Changes by Tom Wardill t...@howrandom.net: -- versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13476] Simple exclusion filter for unittest autodiscovery
Changes by Tom Wardill t...@howrandom.net: -- versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13476 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16055] incorrect error text for int(base=1000, x='1')
Peter Inglesby added the comment: Ok, I've now attached a patch with tests. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27353/issue16055-fix-with-tests.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16055 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16089] _elementtree causes segfault in GC
Christian Heimes added the comment: No, it doesn't make a difference when I replace Py_XDECREF() with Py_CLEAR(). I've also replaced Py_(X)DECREF() in the other *_gc_clear() methods without success. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16089 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8800] add threading.RWLock
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment: Yes, any blocking on the internal lock is not semantic blocking due to the use of the Shared lock itself, but merely a technical aspect, not semantically visible to the program. It is equivalent to the operating system pausing the thread, a techical detail opaque to the user program and somethign it cannot affect or influence. Blocking in the sense of the lock is due to the semantic use of the lock itself and the resources that it protects. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8800 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16094] Tuple extraction in lambda isn't supported with more than one argument
New submission from GlitchMr: Tuple extraction in lambda isn't supported with more than one argument. -- components: 2to3 (2.x to 3.x conversion tool) files: lambda.py messages: 171627 nosy: GlitchMr priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Tuple extraction in lambda isn't supported with more than one argument versions: Python 2.7 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27354/lambda.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16094 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16034] bz2 module appears slower in Python 3.x versus Python 2.x
Nadeem Vawda added the comment: Yes, of course. Awesome. I plan to do a new release for this in the next couple of days. We can even speed up 1.5 times the reading of small chunks, if we inline _check_can_read() and _read_block(). Interesting idea, but I don't think it's worthwhile. It looks like this is only a noticeable improvement if size is 10 or 1, and I don't think these are common cases (especially not for users who care about performance). Also, I'm reluctant to have two copies of the code for _read_block(); it makes the code harder to read, and increases the chance of introducing a bug when changing the code. The same approach is applied for LZMAFile. Of course. I'll apply these optimizations to LZMAFile next weekend. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16034 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16089] _elementtree causes segfault in GC
Stefan Krah added the comment: I'm now able to reproduce the issue with a non-debug build. As Christian says, using Py_CLEAR() does not help (though I wonder if it shouldn't be used anyway). Reverting part of 20b8f0ee3d64 fixes the segfault, see the attached diff. I don't know the code well enough to say if this is a valid possibility. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27355/issue16089-pseudo-fix.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16089 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16089] _elementtree causes segfault in GC
Changes by Georg Brandl ge...@python.org: -- nosy: +georg.brandl ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16089 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16089] _elementtree causes segfault in GC
Christian Heimes added the comment: I can confirm that Stefan's fix works. I ran the SimpleTAL test suite about hundred times in a loop without a segfault. But I don't understand why the change fixes the issue. Could the alteration just lead to another code path so the erroneous code isn't triggered? +1 for Py_CLEAR() -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16089 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15862] IDLE not working when due to wrong Hard Drive point of os.path.expanduser
Cemal Duman added the comment: Hi, yes exactly... I changed my home by using below commands. C:\Python27set HOME=C:\ C:\Python27python -m idlelib.idle it is working. But if i reboot my computer HOME changes again to network drive. I think sth abour corporate programs rewrites this paramters. Thanks / Cemal -- status: pending - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15862 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16090] but is needed somewhere in http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3138/
mani and ram added the comment: When I find it I will open it. On 30 September 2012 12:26, Georg Brandl rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Georg Brandl added the comment: I've gone through the PEP; I've found a few typos and fixed them, but no missing but. Sorry, but without a more specific location I don't think it's sensible to keep this open. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16090 ___ -- nosy: +maniandram ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16090 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16090] but is needed somewhere in http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3138/
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: Somehow my name is displayed as mani and ram when replying by email (I changed my email name from that to Ramchandra Apte) Just so that you know that mani and ram is the same person as Ramchandra Apte -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16090 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16090] but is needed somewhere in http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3138/
Changes by Ramchandra Apte maniandra...@gmail.com: -- resolution: fixed - postponed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16090 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16094] Tuple extraction in lambda isn't supported with more than one argument
Ramchandra Apte added the comment: Python 2.7 and earlier are in bug-fix mode (means no new features) Tuple unpacking is not there in Python 3. Please close this bug as invalid. -- nosy: +ramchandra.apte type: - enhancement ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16094 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16094] Tuple extraction in lambda isn't supported with more than one argument
Mark Dickinson added the comment: Works for me (Python 2.7.3): x = lambda (a, b), c: a + b + c x((2, 3), 4) 9 What issue are you seeing? -- nosy: +mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16094 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16094] Tuple extraction in lambda isn't supported with more than one argument
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: The issue is in lib2to3. tuple_params does not work with lambdas. I confirm the bug. $ ./python -m lib2to3 -f tuple_params lambda_tuple_params.py RefactoringTool: Refactored lambda_tuple_params.py --- lambda_tuple_params.py (original) +++ lambda_tuple_params.py (refactored) @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ lambda (a, b), c: a + b + c -def f((a, b), c): return a + b + c +def f(xxx_todo_changeme, c): (a, b) = xxx_todo_changeme; return a + b + c RefactoringTool: Files that need to be modified: RefactoringTool: lambda_tuple_params.py -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson, storchaka stage: - needs patch type: enhancement - behavior versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27356/lambda_tuple_params.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16094 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16034] bz2 module appears slower in Python 3.x versus Python 2.x
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Also, I'm reluctant to have two copies of the code for _read_block(); it makes the code harder to read, and increases the chance of introducing a bug when changing the code. Recursive inline _check_can_read() will be enough. Now this check calls 4 Python functions (_check_can_read(), readable(), _check_non_closed(), closed). Recursive inlining only readable() in _check_can_read() is achieved significant but less (about 30%) effect. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16034 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15812] inspect.getframeinfo() cannot show first line
Sam Breese added the comment: Looking into this now. Should have a patch either later today or tommorow. -- nosy: +Sam.Breese ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15812 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8800] add threading.RWLock
Richard Oudkerk added the comment: I've added a new patch, that implements a shared/exclusive lock as described in my comments above, for the threading and multiprocessing module. The patch does not seem to touch the threading mode and does not come with tests. I doubt the multiprocessing version is actually picklable since self._requirement is a lambda function. Also it would be best to avoid making multiprocessing.synchronize depend on ctypes. (See implementation of multiprocessing.Barrier or Issue #14953.) Personally, I would prefer to make the shared and exclusive locks attributes of the same object, so one could do with selock.shared: ... with selock.exclusive: ... -- nosy: +sbt ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8800 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15812] inspect.getframeinfo() cannot show first line
Sam Breese added the comment: Also, would you mind posting an example? I'm having trouble replicating. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15812 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15812] inspect.getframeinfo() cannot show first line
Sam Breese added the comment: Nevermind, replicated it. Changing start = max(start, 1) to start = max(start, 0) DOES fix. Writing a test case now. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15812 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16089] _elementtree causes segfault in GC
Eli Bendersky added the comment: I'm currently somewhat offline for a while (cross-continental move), but I'll do my best to try to recreate my setup to test this problem and the proposed solution. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16089 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15812] inspect.getframeinfo() cannot show first line
Sam Breese added the comment: Here's a patch. Very, very simple, just changed that one line in inspect.py and wrote a highly primitive test case for inspect.getframeinfo. The test isn't actually testing the primary functionality right now, just this one bug. I can probably write more expansive coverage later, but in the interest of an expeditious reply I'm submitting now. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27357/inspect_getframeinfo_line1.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15812 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16089] _elementtree causes segfault in GC
Stefan Krah added the comment: Do note that the patch is somewhat cargo-cult. I don't understand yet why it works; it may very well just silence the real problem. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16089 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16055] incorrect error text for int(base=1000, x='1')
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: A few comments on the patch: 1) You should also check the exception type (e.g. by using PyErr_ExceptionMatches()). 2) If the exception doesn't match, you should restore the original exception so that the pure Python test framework will in turn raise it and the caller can inspect it. Currently, the caller will find out only that it doesn't match but not why. Take a look at CHECK_INVALID() to see an example of this pattern being used. 3) I would expose the functionality that checks an exception's type and text as a helper function so that it can be used throughout _testcapimodule.c. The function is nontrivial enough that we wouldn't want to be copying and pasting it throughout if we want to check exception texts for other parts of the C API. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16055 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9650] format codes in time.strptime docstrings
Mike Hoy added the comment: Changed docstring for timemodule.c to include format codes listed here: http://bugs.python.org/msg169193 -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27358/issue9650-format-codes.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9650 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14503] docs: yield from breaks Pygments syntax coloring in doc examples
Georg Brandl added the comment: I've updated the version of Pygments used by 3.3 and 3.4 branches, which fixes this and the raise from issue. -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - fixed status: open - closed versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 2.7, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14503 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13801] The Python 3 Docs don't highlight nonlocal
Georg Brandl added the comment: Pygments is now updated to 1.5pre. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13801 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15533] subprocess.Popen(cwd) documentation
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
So it seems the cwd argument to Popen() currently works differently on Windows
from Mac OS X. For example, the following doesn't work on Windows (but does on
Mac). Windows doesn't look for arg0 relative to arg_cwd:
def test_cwd(arg0, arg_cwd):
os.chdir('foo') # Make sure we're in a different directory from arg0.
p = subprocess.Popen([arg0, -c,
import os, sys;
sys.stdout.write(os.getcwd());
sys.exit(47)],
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
cwd=arg_cwd)
p.wait()
print(stdout: + p.stdout.read().decode(utf-8))
print(return_code: %s % p.returncode)
python_path = os.path.realpath(sys.executable)
python_dir, python_base = os.path.split(python_path)
rel_python = os.path.join(os.curdir, python_base)
# Raises: WindowsError: [Error 2] The system cannot find the file specified
test_cwd(rel_python, python_dir)
I'm going to mark the two tests as skipped on Windows pending a resolution.
--
keywords: -easy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15533
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16094] Tuple extraction in a lambda isn't supported by 2to3
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org: -- title: Tuple extraction in lambda isn't supported with more than one argument - Tuple extraction in a lambda isn't supported by 2to3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16094 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16095] urllib2 failing with squid proxy and digest authentication
New submission from Pietro Battiston:
If you run the following code:
#! /usr/bin/python
import urllib2
MyHTTPPasswordMgr = urllib2.HTTPPasswordMgr
proxy = urllib2.ProxyHandler({'http': 'http://proxybiblio2.si.unimib.it:8080'})
auth = urllib2.ProxyDigestAuthHandler(MyHTTPPasswordMgr())
auth.add_password(None, proxybiblio2.si.unimib.it, a, b )
opener = urllib2.build_opener(proxy, auth, urllib2.HTTPHandler)
urllib2.install_opener(opener)
conn = urllib2.urlopen('http://webofknowledge.com')
an HTTP Error 407: Proxy Authentication Required is raised, and under the
hood here's what's happening:
- the request is made without authentication
- the server replies it must be made with digest authentication, and gives the
nonce
- the error is raised.
Instead, urllib2 should now try to connect with the username and password, and
do so up to 5 times (as hardcoded in urllib2.http_error_auth_reqed), and then
raise a HTTP Error 401: digest auth failed. And it's indeed what it does if
you replace the line MyHTTPPasswordMgr = urllib2.HTTPPasswordMgr with
class MyHTTPPasswordMgr(urllib2.HTTPPasswordMgr):
def find_user_password(self, realm, authuri):
return a, b
So the problem is in HTTPPasswordMgr, which is apparently unable to match the
authentication data with the realm. Some tests¹ suggest that this can vary
according to the proxy engine and to the proxy address format (works with
apache, but doesn't if then you add http://; in front of the proxy address).
This reminds a bit bug 680577, and in particular I noticed that (possibly
unrelated) the behaviour reported in the following message:
http://bugs.python.org/msg1
has not changed:
In [1]: import urllib2
In [2]: urllib2.HTTPPasswordMgr().is_suburi(/foo/spam, /foo/eggs)Out[2]:
True
This affects also python 3.2, you can try the following:
#! /usr/bin/python
from urllib import request
MyHTTPPasswordMgr = request.HTTPPasswordMgr
proxy = request.ProxyHandler({'http': 'http://proxybiblio2.si.unimib.it:8080'})
auth = request.ProxyDigestAuthHandler(MyHTTPPasswordMgr())
auth.add_password(None, proxybiblio2.si.unimib.it, a, b )
opener = request.build_opener(proxy, auth, request.HTTPHandler)
request.install_opener(opener)
conn = request.urlopen('http://webofknowledge.com')
¹ http://lists.python.it/pipermail/python/2012-September/013309.html (in
Italian)
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 171650
nosy: toobaz
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: urllib2 failing with squid proxy and digest authentication
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16095
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16095] urllib2 failing with squid proxy and digest authentication
Changes by Pietro Battiston m...@pietrobattiston.it: -- versions: +Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16095 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16082] xml.etree.ElementTree.tostringlist does conform to it's documentation
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16082 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16076] xml.etree.ElementTree.Element is no longer pickleable
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16076 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16094] Tuple extraction in a lambda isn't supported by 2to3
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16094 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16089] _elementtree causes segfault in GC
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16089 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15533] subprocess.Popen(cwd) documentation
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset d8d52b5b4bc2 by Chris Jerdonek in branch '3.2': Issue #15533: Skip test_cwd_with_relative_*() tests on Windows pending resolution of issue. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d8d52b5b4bc2 New changeset 17d709f0b69b by Chris Jerdonek in branch '3.3': Issue #15533: Merge update from 3.2. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/17d709f0b69b New changeset d10a7c1ac3a7 by Chris Jerdonek in branch 'default': Issue #15533: Merge update from 3.3. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d10a7c1ac3a7 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15533 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16007] Improved Error message for failing re expressions
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- stage: - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16007 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16009] Json error messages could provide more information about the error
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16009 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16074] bad error message in os.rename
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16074 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9650] format codes in time.strptime docstrings
Ezio Melotti added the comment: The patch contains non-ascii apostrophes: s/Locale’s/Locale's/ -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9650 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16095] urllib2 failing with squid proxy and digest authentication
Changes by Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com: -- assignee: - orsenthil nosy: +orsenthil ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16095 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8800] add threading.RWLock
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment: I can't say that I'm that familiar with multiprocessing to comment on that in particular. But I do find your approach strange, to create two lock-like objects, in stead of the more familiar construct of having a RWLock (this is known from other languages) with two ways of claiming it. Attached is a new patch. I've adopted the name SharableLock perhaps it is bad. It uses your idea of returning lock-like objects that do either shared or exclusive locking. There are two implementations: SharableLock is much like the original patch, with two conditions and writer priority. SimpleSharableLock drops all that, and uses a single condition and ad-hoc priority. I've added unittests that show that writer-starvation does not appear to be a problem. Createing a Multiprocessing lock using the SharableLockBase should pose no difficulties. The use of the SharableLock with Condition objects is forced to be Exclusive, since Condition objects typcially rely on their associated lock to synchronize internal state. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27359/sharablelock.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8800 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14783] Make int() and str() docstrings correct
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: The change for issue 15831 contains a number of places where a single signature line was converted to multiple -- but in the docs and not the docstrings. Those instances can also be examined for this issue. The signature line for str() was not updated in that patch, however. -- stage: commit review - needs patch versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14783 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16086] tp_flags: Undefined behaviour with 32 bits long
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Ok, I'm not Martin, but I'll try to answer. An ABI pertains to the interfaces exposed by compiled object code, not source code. With C, function signatures in compiled code don't keep any type information (*), and they obviously doesn't know about macros either. So I'd answer No to both questions :-) (*) it would be different with C++, because of name mangling -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16086 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13028] python wastes linux users time by checking for dylib on each dynamic library load
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Which was the command run under strace exactly? -- nosy: +brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13028 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16096] Get rid of dangerous integer overflow tricks
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: In several places such dungerous code used to check the integer overflow: size = n * itemsize; if (size / itemsize != n) raise exception... Because these values are signed, this results in undefined behavior. The proposed patches replace similar unsafe code to safe one. Note that the patches for the different versions are substantially different. -- components: Extension Modules, Interpreter Core files: size_overflow-3.3.patch keywords: patch messages: 171657 nosy: mark.dickinson, storchaka priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Get rid of dangerous integer overflow tricks type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27360/size_overflow-3.3.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16096 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16096] Get rid of dangerous integer overflow tricks
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27361/size_overflow-3.2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16096 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16096] Get rid of dangerous integer overflow tricks
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27362/size_overflow-2.7.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16096 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16049] Create abstract base classes by inheritance rather than a direct invocation of __metaclass__
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: It looks slightly better, but it would also violate there is one obvious way to do it. -- nosy: +gvanrossum, pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16049 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8800] add threading.RWLock
Sebastian Noack added the comment: I was just waiting for a comment pointing out, that my patch comes without tests. :) Note that we are still discussing the implementation and this patch is just a proof of concept. And since the way it is implemented and the API it provides could still change, its quite pointless to write tests, until we at least agreed on the API. I have uploaded a new patch. The way it is implemented now, is more like the Barrier is implemented. The common code is shared in the threading module and the shared/exclusive lock objects can be pickled now. I have also fixed a bug related to acquiring locks in non-blocking mode. However the code still uses c_uint, but ctypes (and multiprocessing.sharedtypes) is only imported when ShrdExclLock is called. So it is just a lazy dependency, now. However the reason why I am using ctypes instead of python integers for threading and a BufferWrapper for multiprocessing (as the Barrier does) is, because of 2 of the 4 counters need to be continuously incremented, and c_uint has the nice feature that it can overflow, in contrast to python integers and integers in arrays. Also that way the implementation is simpler and it seems that there isn't much difference under the hood between using BufferWrapper() and RawValue(). A shared/exclusive lock isn't one lock but two locks, which are synchronized, but must be acquired separately. Similar to a pipe, which isn't one file, but one file connected to another file that reads whatever you have written into the first file. So it isn't strange to create two lock objects, as it also isn't strange that os.pipe() returns two file descriptors. Also having a separate lock object for the shared and exclusive lock, each providing the same API (as Lock and RLock), gives you huge flexibility. You can acquire both locks using the with statement or pass them separately around. So for example when you have a function, thread or child process, that should only be able to acquire either the shared or the exclusive lock, you don't have to pass both locks. That also means that existing code that expects a lock-like object will be compatible with both the shared and exclusive lock. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27363/Added-ShrdExclLock-to-threading-and-multiprocessing-2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8800 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9650] format codes in time.strptime docstrings
Mike Hoy added the comment: Updated patch as per Ezio's comment. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27364/issue9650-format-codes_v2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9650 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15599] test_circular_imports() of test_threaded_import fails on FreeBSD 9.0
Stefan Krah added the comment:
For once a Linux bot shows the failure that is the topic of this
issue:
http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/x86%20Gentoo%20Non-Debug%203.x/builds/3101/steps/test/logs/stdio
==
FAIL: test_circular_imports (test.test_threaded_import.ThreadedImportTests)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
/var/lib/buildslave/3.x.murray-gentoo-wide/build/Lib/test/test_threaded_import.py,
line 205, in test_circular_imports
self.assertEqual(set(results), {'a', 'b'})
AssertionError: Items in the second set but not the first:
'b'
'a'
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15599
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14783] Make int() and str() docstrings correct
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: So (a) there is precedent for multiple signatures in docstrings For the record, this is also true of 2.7: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/15fd0b4496e0/Objects/bytearrayobject.c#l2870 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14783 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9674] make install DESTDIR=/home/blah fails when the prefix specified is /
Éric Araujo added the comment: A unit test is needed. -- versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9674 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15923] Building from a fresh clone breaks on Parser/asdl_c.py
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 8f07ab82de92 by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7': #15923: fix a mistake in asdl_c.py that resulted in a TypeError after 2801bf875a24 (see #15801). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8f07ab82de92 New changeset cb988d601803 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2': #15923: fix a mistake in asdl_c.py that resulted in a TypeError after 2801bf875a24 (see #15801). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cb988d601803 New changeset e7a55a393a80 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.3': #15923: merge with 3.2. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e7a55a393a80 New changeset b392a39970bb by Ezio Melotti in branch 'default': #15923: merge with 3.3. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b392a39970bb -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15923 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15801] Weird string interpolation behaviour
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 8f07ab82de92 by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7': #15923: fix a mistake in asdl_c.py that resulted in a TypeError after 2801bf875a24 (see #15801). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8f07ab82de92 New changeset cb988d601803 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2': #15923: fix a mistake in asdl_c.py that resulted in a TypeError after 2801bf875a24 (see #15801). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cb988d601803 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15801 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15923] Building from a fresh clone breaks on Parser/asdl_c.py
Ezio Melotti added the comment: This is now fixed. self.emit(default: % name, 2) worked until #15801 got fixed, Since asdl_c.py is executed using the system Python, this was failing only when the system Python included the fix. -- assignee: - ezio.melotti components: +Build nosy: +ezio.melotti resolution: - fixed stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed type: - behavior versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15923 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8800] add threading.RWLock
Kristján Valur Jónsson added the comment: A shared/exclusive lock isn't one lock but two locks, which are synchronized, but must be acquired separately. Similar to a pipe, which isn't one file, but one file connected to another file that reads whatever you have written into the first file. So it isn't strange to create two lock objects, as it also isn't strange that os.pipe() returns two file descriptors That's one way to look at it. Another (and the more common) is to say that it is one lock, which can be in two different states. The original patch is modeled on seveal such constructs that exist in the field, such as for example the SRW locks in windows: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa904937(v=vs.85).aspx (In fact, I am rather leaning back towards the RWLock name again, since that seems to be the most commonly used on other platforms. Oh, how tempting it is to bikeshed about such trivialities.) Note that in my last patch, I provide the exclusive_locked() and shared_locked() methods that return exactly such locks as you describe. I'd much rather have a single RW Lock object, with retgular locking proxies, rather than two distinct object, attached only by some shared common variables. Also, with the structured approach I suggest, you can relatively easily create such a lock that also works across process boundaries by implementing a concrete class with SharableLockBase as a base. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8800 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16049] Create abstract base classes by inheritance rather than a direct invocation of __metaclass__
Guido van Rossum added the comment: In practice this is indeed how most users of met a classes do it. E.g. Django. So, +1. --Guido van Rossum (sent from Android phone) On Sep 30, 2012 11:36 AM, Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Antoine Pitrou added the comment: It looks slightly better, but it would also violate there is one obvious way to do it. -- nosy: +gvanrossum, pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16049 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16049 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8800] add threading.RWLock
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Ok, since we're bikeshedding, I like Richard's proposal best: Personally, I would prefer to make the shared and exclusive locks attributes of the same object, so one could do with selock.shared: ... with selock.exclusive: ... Please note, the same object could simply be a namedtuple instance. Also I think shared/exclusive indeed conveys the semantics better than read/write. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8800 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13028] python wastes linux users time by checking for dylib on each dynamic library load
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org: -- status: open - pending ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13028 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15599] test_circular_imports() of test_threaded_import fails on FreeBSD 9.0
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: For once a Linux bot shows the failure that is the topic of this issue: Hmm, so there may be a small race condition after all? The problem is that I can't reproduce, on a non-debug build as on that buildbot, after more than 43000 (!) test runs. Either this failure is incredibly sporadic, or it needs certain conditions my system doesn't meet. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15599 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16081] Fix compile warnings in thread_pthread.h
Michele Orrù added the comment: That's ok for me. Tested with OSX 10.8 and clang. -- nosy: +maker ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16081 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16081] Fix compile warnings in thread_pthread.h
Brian Brazil added the comment: I'm on gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3, this was the only warning I saw (though I don't have all the optional libraries installed). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16081 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1052827] filelist.findall should not fail on dangling symlinks
Changes by Michele Orrù maker...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +maker ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1052827 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9650] format codes in time.strptime docstrings
Chris Rebert added the comment: I'm going to bikeshed and again suggest that %I and %p be included for handling 12-hour clock times. Also, the patch seems to only be for strftime(), and not strptime(). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9650 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8800] add threading.RWLock
Richard Oudkerk added the comment: @Sebastian: Both your patch sets are missing the changes to threading.py. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8800 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15862] IDLE not working when due to wrong Hard Drive point of os.path.expanduser
Roger Serwy added the comment: In your original message, did IDLE eventually start when you ran: C:\Python27python.exe Lib\idlelib\idle.py ? If yes, then the bug is likely due to issue13582. If I understand correctly, when you reboot your computer, IDLE won't launch from the shortcut in the start menu? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15862 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9650] format codes in time.strptime docstrings
Mike Hoy added the comment: New patch includes time.strptime and the additional changes suggested by Chris Rebert. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27365/issue9650-format-codes_v3.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9650 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16034] bz2 module appears slower in Python 3.x versus Python 2.x
Nadeem Vawda added the comment: Recursive inline _check_can_read() will be enough. Now this check calls 4 Python functions (_check_can_read(), readable(), _check_non_closed(), closed). Recursive inlining only readable() in _check_can_read() is achieved significant but less (about 30%) effect. I've inlined readable() into _check_can_read() [3.3: 4258248a44c7 | default: abb5c5bde872]. This seems like a good balance between maximizing our performance in edge cases and not turning the code into a mess in the process ;) Once again, thanks for your contributions! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16034 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12930] reindent.py inserts spaces in multiline literals
Roger Serwy added the comment: This issue also affects reindent.py in Python 3.x. The attached patch adds a -s switch to reindent.py to disallow changes to the contents of strings. The rstrip_and_expand_tabs function tokenizes the input to identify all strings and then expands and rstrips all parts of the input not within a string. -- versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27366/issue12930.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12930 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12930] reindent.py inserts spaces in multiline literals
Roger Serwy added the comment: Attached is a simple test of the -s functionality for reindent.py. It works on Linux but I'm not sure about Windows. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27367/test_reindent.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12930 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16074] bad error message in os.rename
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16074 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16076] xml.etree.ElementTree.Element is no longer pickleable
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16076 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16034] bz2 module appears slower in Python 3.x versus Python 2.x
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: In fact I have tried other code, a bit faster and more maintainable (see patch). -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27368/bz2_bikeshedding.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16034 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10951] gcc 4.6 warnings
Martin Pool added the comment: Hi, Martin, On 20 August 2012 05:25, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Martin v. Löwis added the comment: (As usual), I'm quite skeptical about this bulk bug report; it violates the one bug at a time principle, where one bug can roughly be defined as cannot be split into smaller independent issues. I heartily agree with you in general: as well as being non-atomic, it's also hard to have a clear test whether such bugs are fixed. But, I hope this patch has some value even if the bug is not a great example. For the cases at hand, I think it would be best if somebody with gcc 4.6 available just fixed the easy ones, i.e. where the code clearly improves when silenciing the warning. In these cases, I wouldn't mind if they get checked in without code review; I know some favor review for all changes, in which case a separate issue should be opened for a patch fixing a bunch of these. I've fixed what I believe to be all the safe/easy warnings in my patch above. I would appreciate if someone would review it and if possible commit it. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10951 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12930] reindent.py inserts spaces in multiline literals
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Definitely a bugfix should not add any new switches. Patch would simply lead to preserving of all string literals and nothing more. I will look at Caio's patches a little later. Now Python contains automated tests for some tools. -- nosy: +storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12930 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9650] format codes in time.strptime docstrings
Chris Rebert added the comment: This is now hardcore nitpicking, but I'm conflicted as to whether %p should be grouped with the other locale-related codes or with %I (since it's hard to imagine using %I or %p in a singleton capacity). In any case, props to Mike for putting an actual patch together. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9650 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13476] Simple exclusion filter for unittest autodiscovery
Changes by Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk: -- assignee: - michael.foord ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13476 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11489] json.dumps not parsable by json.loads (on Linux only)
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Attached failing test. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27369/issue11489.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11489 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12930] reindent.py inserts spaces in multiline literals
Roger Serwy added the comment: Definitely a bugfix should not add any new switches. Patch would simply lead to preserving of all string literals and nothing more. I added the switch so that the existing behavior of reindent would stay the same in case some other scripts rely on that behavior. If you'd rather not include the switch, then I'm ok with removing it. The patch causes reindent to no longer removes trailing whitespace on multi-line doc strings. Is that side-effect acceptable? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12930 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: [Django/Rietveld is erroring out for me when I try to reply there, so replying here] On 2012/10/01 01:45:03, cvrebert wrote: Doc/library/functions.rst:636: arguments are given. If *x* is a number, return :meth:`x.__int__() How is number-ness determined? Are we just assuming anything with an __int__() method is a number for purposes of explanation? cvrebert, this patch has already been committed to 3.x. Maybe open a new issue if you think the language can be improved further? (Feel free to add me to the nosy list.) This issue was originally focused more on updating just the signature line (along with any consequent changes to the text). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16036 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()
Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Felipe, could you please submit a Contributor Agreement Form? http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ Your patch looks good to me, although I would move almost all fclose(fp); PyErr_Format(ZipImportError, can't read Zip file: %R, archive); return NULL; To a goto label. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15897 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
