[issue21517] installer Python default setting fails with mac Python Launcher
Ned Deily added the comment: Python.org installers do not install anything to /usr/bin; they do, by default, install symbolic links in /usr/local/bin. Python 3 installers set the symlink /usr/local/bin/python3 to the most recently installed version. The Python Launcher app has several open design issues, including whether it should be included at all. Currently, each version of Python (from python.org) installs its own copy of Python Launcher.app but they all share the same preference file. You can set the path to your preferred interpreter version by launching Python Launcher.app and then, in the Preferences pane, selecting the file type (e.g. Python Script) and typing the interpreter path into the Interpreter: text box (e.g. /usr/local/bin/python3.4), rather than using any of the preset defaults in the pulldown list. -- nosy: +ned.deily resolution: - works for me stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21517 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21385] in debug mode, compile(ast) fails with an assertion error if an AST node has no line number information
R. David Murray added the comment: Victor: in the production code discussed in the original posting, there *are* line numbers, and they are meaningful; they just aren't monotonically increasing. I believe the request here is to simply remove the assert. (If we did that, we'd have to also add tests that python itself was generating monotonically increasing line number, and make some doc changes.) -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21385 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21386] ipaddress.IPv4Address.is_global not implemented
R. David Murray added the comment: The patch looks correct to me, but we also need tests. -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21386 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21391] shutil uses both os.path.abspath and an 'import from' of abspath
R. David Murray added the comment: I'd prefer to get rid of it, otherwise we might get requests to add all the other os.path functions to the shutil namespace, and I don't think having that kind of more than one way to do it serves anyone. I suppose we'll have to deprecate it first if we do get rid of it :(. -- nosy: +r.david.murray title: PATCH: using the abspath shortcut in Lib/shutil - shutil uses both os.path.abspath and an 'import from' of abspath ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21397] tempfile.py: Fix grammar in docstring, comment typos
R. David Murray added the comment: 'below' doesn't make sense at all if you view it via pydoc. There is only one unsafe function left, mktemp. Here is an alternate patch that takes advantage of that fact. -- nosy: +r.david.murray Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35268/tempfile-docstring.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21397 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18540] imaplib.IMAP4() ends with Name or service not known on Fedora 18
R. David Murray added the comment: Milan: using 'localhost' is incorrect, since the string 'localhost' will not always resolve to the local host IP, while passing None to getaddrinfo will. It is significant that the example fails. We need a test for this case (the imap tests have been historically very poor, though we've improved that somewhat in the past few years). Although it is a low-probability thing, someone might be depending on self.host being '' by default, so I think the better (and simpler) fix is to convert '' to None in the _create_socket method. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18540 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21509] json.load fails to read UTF-8 file with (BOM) Byte Order Marks
Kristian Benoit added the comment: I added code to skip the bom if present when encoding is either None or utf-8. The problem I have with Victor's solution is that users don't know these files are not plain UTF-8. Most text editor says it's utf-8 encoded, how can a user figure out there 3 hidden bytes at the start of the file ? Kristian -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35269/json.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21509 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21517] installer Python default setting fails with mac Python Launcher
Andrew Harrington added the comment: I see not messing with /usr/bin. Your note about Python Launcher would be a nice addition to the Mac installer notes. I would encourage that before closing this. On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Ned Deily rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Ned Deily added the comment: Python.org installers do not install anything to /usr/bin; they do, by default, install symbolic links in /usr/local/bin. Python 3 installers set the symlink /usr/local/bin/python3 to the most recently installed version. The Python Launcher app has several open design issues, including whether it should be included at all. Currently, each version of Python (from python.org) installs its own copy of Python Launcher.app but they all share the same preference file. You can set the path to your preferred interpreter version by launching Python Launcher.app and then, in the Preferences pane, selecting the file type (e.g. Python Script) and typing the interpreter path into the Interpreter: text box (e.g. /usr/local/bin/python3.4), rather than using any of the preset defaults in the pulldown list. -- nosy: +ned.deily resolution: - works for me stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21517 ___ -- Dr. Andrew N. Harrington Computer Science Department Graduate Program Director g...@cs.luc.edu Loyola University Chicago 529 Lewis Tower, 111 E. Pearson St. (Downtown) 104 Loyola Hall, 1032 W. Sheridan Road (Rogers Park) http://www.cs.luc.edu/~anh Phone: 312-915-7982 Fax:312-915-7998 ahar...@luc.edu (as professor, not gpd role) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21517 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15014] smtplib: add support for arbitrary auth methods
R. David Murray added the comment: OK, I've finally had time to review this, sorry for the delay. The impalib mechanism is tailored to how imap works (that's the whole thing about continuation response. smtplib auth works a bit differently, and your adaptation looks OK to me. The accompanying docstrings are a bit confusing, though, since they copy the imaplib language, which isn't entirely applicable. Instead of talking about a 'continuation response', it should talk about a '334 challenge response', I think. Also, both the imaplib and smptlib methods are named after the corresponding command names in the protocol. So for imaplib we have 'authenticate', but for smtplib it should be 'auth'. I also think we should expose the supported auth methods as part of the public API. I think exposing the preferred auth list is premature, since if we are going to do that we need to have a way to add elements to that list for the users's own auth methods and we don't have that. So let's confine this issue to adding the 'auth' method and using it in the login method. The tests should include a new test of calling the auth method directly. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15014 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21509] json.load fails to read UTF-8 file with (BOM) Byte Order Marks
Changes by Kristian Benoit kristian.ben...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35270/json.v2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21509 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21518] Expose RegUnloadKey in winreg
New submission from Claudiu.Popa: Hello. While working on issue8579, I noticed that there is no way to detach a key from the registry, loaded with LoadKey function. The attached patch exposes RegUnLoadKeyW as winreg.UnloadKey. Also, this patch adds a new script in the test folder, windows_helper.py, which could be an useful addition for testing Windows specific issues, like acquiring / releasing a privilege. -- components: Library (Lib) files: winreg_unload_key.patch keywords: patch messages: 218708 nosy: Claudiu.Popa priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Expose RegUnloadKey in winreg type: enhancement versions: Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35271/winreg_unload_key.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21518 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21518] Expose RegUnloadKey in winreg
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21518 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21518] Expose RegUnloadKey in winreg
Claudiu.Popa added the comment: It needs administrator elevation for running the test. I'll update the patch to skip the test if the user doesn't have elevation. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21518 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21516] pathlib.Path(...).is_dir() crashes on some directories (Windows)
Thomas Heller added the comment: When you say os.path.isdir(...) works fine, you mean it's returning False? As shown in the original report (http://bugs.python.org/issue21516#msg218664) os.path.isdir() returns True; which is correct since c:\Users\admin is a directory on my machine. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21516 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21430] Document ssl.pending()
Steffen Ullrich added the comment: Data transport in SSL is not done with plain TCP, but with encoded frames inside TCP. To get decoded data one has to first receive the full frame, even if one is only interested in the first bytes. Example: - server does an SSL_write with 200 bytes. This will result in a frame which contain all the 200 bytes. - if the client does a SSL_read (e.g. recv) to get 100 bytes the underlying SSL stack will read the full frame, but return only 100 bytes of the 200 bytes. - if the client then would call select to check if more data are available this would fail, because select checks the data on the socket only. But pending would return that there are still 100 bytes available for read in the SSL stack. So to make use of select with SSL the application would have to check first with pending, if there are already buffered data, and only if there are no buffered data it should call select to check if there are data on the socket. But, one could skip the call of pending if all SSL_read (recv) are at least 16k, because this is the maximum size of an SSL frame and SSL_read will not read more than one SSL frame at a time (actually I'm not sure if python calls only SSL_read once within recv, but I assume so). You might have a look at the examples and documentation for non-blocking I/O for Perls IO::Socket::SSL package (disclaimer: I'm the maintainer): http://search.cpan.org/~sullr/IO-Socket-SSL-1.987/lib/IO/Socket/SSL.pm -- nosy: +noxxi ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21430 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21430] Document ssl.pending()
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
So to make use of select with SSL the application would have to check first
with pending, if there are already buffered data,
What's the point of checking? Just call SSL_read() and catch the
SSL_ERROR_WANT_{READ,WRITE} to determine that no data is available; as a bonus
it also tells you whether you have to select() for read or for write.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21430
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21430] Document ssl.pending()
Bas Wijnen added the comment: After trying to use this, I think ssl.pending is a valuable function that should be supported and documented. My use case is a half-synchronous system, where I want most calls to block but asynchronous events are possible as well. Switching the socket between blocking and non-blocking all the time is annoying and results in code that is harder to read. With ssl.pending, I can simply repeat the read as long as data is pending. Setting my buffer size high might technically work, but that seems too fragile. I don't like using an undocumented function either, but I'm hoping that gets fixed. ;-) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21430 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21362] concurrent.futures does not validate that max_workers is proper
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 3024ad49f00e by Brian Quinlan in branch 'default': Issue #21362: concurrent.futures does not validate that max_workers is proper http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3024ad49f00e -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21362 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21362] concurrent.futures does not validate that max_workers is proper
Brian Quinlan added the comment: Committed, thanks for the fix! -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21362 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10744] ctypes arrays have incorrect buffer information (PEP-3118)
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 44dac2e7fcb8 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '2.7': support pep 3118 format strings for ctypes objects with nontrivial shapes (closes #10744) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/44dac2e7fcb8 New changeset 22938bf57161 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.4': support pep 3118 format strings for ctypes objects with nontrivial shapes (closes #10744) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/22938bf57161 New changeset ea9193340d6c by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default': merge 3.4 (#10744) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ea9193340d6c -- nosy: +python-dev resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10744 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20186] Derby #18: Convert 31 sites to Argument Clinic across 23 files
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 060cfd049d14 by Stefan Krah in branch 'default': Issue #20186: memoryobject.c: add function signatures. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/060cfd049d14 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20186 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20186] Derby #18: Convert 31 sites to Argument Clinic across 23 files
Stefan Krah added the comment: memoryobject.c is converted with a minimal patch (I would like to keep 100% code coverage for the file). -- nosy: +skrah ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20186 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21430] Document ssl.pending()
Steffen Ullrich added the comment:
What's the point of checking? Just call SSL_read() and catch the
SSL_ERROR_WANT_{READ,WRITE} to determine that no data is available; as a
bonus it also tells you whether you have to select() for read or for write.
A common scenario with non-blocking sockets is to have lots of sockets at the
same time and a central select loop. And whenever a socket gets ready it
usually reads only as much as is needed for its current task and then returns
to the select-loop.
I was trying to point out that for SSL enabled sockets this approach will no
longer work and might cause odd stalling of connections, because select will
not show the socket as readable although data are there for read. I don't think
it is enough to just document pending, but it should be documented that the
behavior with SSL sockets with select differs from the behavior one is used
from normal TCP sockets.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21430
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21430] Document ssl.pending()
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I was trying to point out that for SSL enabled sockets this approach will no longer work and might cause odd stalling of connections, because select will not show the socket as readable although data are there for read. You are right, this is worth mentioning in the documentation. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21430 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19980] Improve help('non-topic') response
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I propose the following. help('') returns help on strings in the same way that
help([]) and help({}) returns help on lists and dicts respectively, further
help(''.method) returns help on the string method or an attribute error, so
this appears to me consistent. help('doh') returns enhanced output along the
lines Terry suggested in msg206157. help('module') gives the path to the
module as well as the help output, if any, as I think this could be useful in
cases where you're looking for problems and have a stdlib module masked by a
file of your own. Thoughts?
If we can come to an agreement I'll try and work up a patch.
Note that I've tried looking at the test code and it didn't make much sense to
me, pointers welcome.
I've also just signed the contributor's agreement.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19980
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21430] Document ssl.pending()
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset b820b1b282b2 by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.4': Issue #21430: additions to the description of non-blocking SSL sockets http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b820b1b282b2 New changeset 077e64b23592 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Issue #21430: additions to the description of non-blocking SSL sockets http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/077e64b23592 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21430 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21385] in debug mode, compile(ast) fails with an assertion error if an AST node has no line number information
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Summary of this post: compile currently checks user input with assert; this is a bug that should be changed. I re-read astlinenotest.py and realized that FunctionDef is included in '*' and not some omitted import. (The latter is common for code posted on python-list, if not here. This illustrates why PEP 8 deprecates 'import *'; import ast ... ast.FunctionDef would have been clear on first reading.) So I ran the module in installed 3.4 and repository debug 3.5 and got the assert with the latter. It seems to me that when the lnotab was created, no one even had in mind that there would be an actually useful AST module that would be used for code generation. I am pretty sure this is correct. I suspect that the assert in question was originally intended to test the logic of the internal syntax tree line number generation. But now it also tests user input, which I and may others think is a bad idea. A solution between removing the assert (and the internal check) and converting it to, say, ValueError(decreasing line no in input ast), and thereby stopping code that now normally and legitimately works, would be to skip the asserts when the compile input is an ast instead of code. -- stage: - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21385 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7776] http.client.HTTPConnection tunneling is broken
Changes by Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org: -- versions: -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7776 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7776] http.client.HTTPConnection tunneling is broken
Donald Stufft added the comment: @larry Is there anything else I need to do? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7776 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21391] shutil uses both os.path.abspath and an 'import from' of abspath
Berker Peksag added the comment: Here is a patch to deprecate the shutil.abspath function. -- nosy: +berker.peksag Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35272/issue21391.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21391 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2052] Allow changing difflib._file_template character encoding.
Berker Peksag added the comment: Attaching a new version of issue2052_html5.diff. Changes: - Switch from px to em in CSS - Cleanup markup a bit (e.g. delete redundant colgroup tags) -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35273/issue2052_html5_v2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2052 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21112] 3.4 regression: unittest.expectedFailure no longer works on TestCase subclasses
Berker Peksag added the comment: Berker: do you consider your diff ready to go in, or is it an early diff (like a work-in-progress)? I tested my patch with test_expectedFailure.py again. The patch is not really fixes the problem described in msg215240. So, I consider it a WIP patch for now. Sorry for the noise. Here is the output on Python 3.3: $ python3.3 -m unittest discover -v test_fails (test_expectedFailure.TestControl) ... FAIL test_passes (test_expectedFailure.TestControl) ... ok == FAIL: test_fails (test_expectedFailure.TestControl) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/berker/projects/cpython-default/playground/test_expectedFailure.py, line 9, in test_fails self.assertFalse(True) AssertionError: True is not false -- Ran 2 tests in 0.001s FAILED (failures=1) And here is the output on Python 3.5 (with issue21112.diff patch): $ ./../python -m unittest discover -v test_fails (test_expectedFailure.TestControl) ... FAIL test_passes (test_expectedFailure.TestControl) ... ok test_fails (test_expectedFailure.TestTreatment) ... expected failure test_passes (test_expectedFailure.TestTreatment) ... unexpected success == FAIL: test_fails (test_expectedFailure.TestControl) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/berker/projects/cpython-default/playground/test_expectedFailure.py, line 9, in test_fails self.assertFalse(True) AssertionError: True is not false -- Ran 4 tests in 0.002s FAILED (failures=1, expected failures=1, unexpected successes=1) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21112 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7776] http.client.HTTPConnection tunneling is broken
Senthil Kumaran added the comment: @dstufft - should you commit it in 3.4 branch (since the change is already in 3.5) and then wait for larry's approval or rejection? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7776 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7776] http.client.HTTPConnection tunneling is broken
Larry Hastings added the comment: Okay, this has my blessing to be merged for 3.4.1. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7776 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7776] http.client.HTTPConnection tunneling is broken
Changes by Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7776 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21470] Better seeding for the random module
Larry Hastings added the comment: (If the past few weeks have taught us *anything*, it's that we can't look to OpenSSL to learn best practices.) -- nosy: +larry stage: - resolved ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21470 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21112] 3.4 regression: unittest.expectedFailure no longer works on TestCase subclasses
Larry Hastings added the comment: Considering that I'm tagging 3.4.1 within an hour or two, and we don't have a patch yet, I'd say that this is too late to go into 3.4.1. But I'm happy to consider it for a future 3.4.x revision. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21112 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21430] Document ssl.pending()
Alexey Gorshkov added the comment: Issue #21430: additions to the description of non-blocking SSL sockets I do not see any mention of .pending() in Your commit. Is this some personal hate to subject? Are You going to document this method or not? Documenting it on line of text. If You are not going to document this method, will You accept my patch for documentation adding this method? Simply saying: This issue is here, people wand documentation for what must be documented for over a 5 years now (http://bugs.python.org/issue1251). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21430 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20362] longMessage attribute is ignored in unittest.TestCase.assertRegexpMatches etc
Berker Peksag added the comment: I've added missing self._formatMessage() functions to assertRegex and assertNotRegex asserts. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +berker.peksag stage: needs patch - patch review versions: -Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35274/issue20362.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20362 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21519] IDLE : Bug in keybinding validity check
New submission from Saimadhav Heblikar: Steps to reproduce the bug: 1. IDLE options configure idle keys 2. Try to replace a keybinding for an action with that of another action which has more than one keybinding. For eg : Default binding of copy=Control-Key-c Control-Key-C. So, try to replace any other keybinding with Control-Key-c 3. This change is accepted Now the Control-Key-C binding will be assigned to two actions. This bug only applies if the other action has more than one binding. In case the other action has only one binding, an error is raised(as expected). Attaching a patch to fix this issue. -- components: IDLE files: keybinding.diff keywords: patch messages: 218734 nosy: sahutd, terry.reedy priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: IDLE : Bug in keybinding validity check type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35275/keybinding.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21519 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
