[issue21270] unittest.mock.call object has inherited count method
Kushal Das added the comment: To start with I am overriding count and index method. Do you think this is enough? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21270 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21922] PyLong: use GMP
Mark Dickinson added the comment: IMO you must discuss the GMP license on the python-dev mailing list I think the maintenance implications of having another external dependency would also need discussion on python-dev. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21922 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21922] PyLong: use GMP
Mark Dickinson added the comment: Hmm. Looking back at my previous comments, I should explain my negativity a bit better. 1. Like Victor's issue 1814 work, this is great stuff, and very impressive. 2. I'm really not convinced that it belongs in the Python core. To expand on 2: we already have a simple, highly portable, battle-tested implementation of big integers that's reasonably efficient for normal uses and requires little day-to-day maintenance. We'd be replacing that with something that's a lot more complicated, less thoroughly tested, and *not* significantly more efficient in normal use-cases. Apart from the pain of the transition (and any refactor of this size is bound to involve some pain), I'm particularly worried about future headaches involved in maintaining the external GMP dependency: keeping up with bugfixes, managing the binary builds, etc. I anticipate that that would add quite of a lot of work for the core team in general and those building releases in particular. (And that's another reason that we should have a python-dev discussion, so that those involved in the release process get a chance to weigh in.) To offset that, there needs to be a clear *benefit* to making this change. A couple of specific questions for Hristo Venev: - What's the current status of GMP on Windows? IIUC, one of the motivations for the MPIR unfriendly fork of GMP was better Windows support. Does your patch already build cleanly on Windows? - Whom do you see this change benefiting? Those doing serious large-number stuff on Python (SAGE users, for example) are presumably already using gmpy2 or something similar. - Do you want to initiate the python-dev discussion, or leave that to someone else? [I'm deliberately steering clear of the licensing issues; it needs discussion, but IANAL and I have nothing useful to contribute here.] -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21922 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15133] tkinter.BooleanVar.get() behavior and docstring disagree
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Here is a patch. 1) getboolean() and BooleanVar.get() now always return bool. Wrapping the result of getboolean() into bool() is not more needed. 2) getboolean() and BooleanVar.get() now works with Tcl_Obj. This makes Tkinter more robust against future Tcl/Tk changes. 3) An exception is raised if an argument to BooleanVar.set() couldn't be considered as boolean value. An argument is converted to canonized 0/1 values. This makes errors to be exposed earlier. Similar changes should be made for getint() and getdouble(). -- keywords: +patch stage: - patch review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35897/tkinter_getboolean.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15133 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21922] PyLong: use GMP
Mark Dickinson added the comment: Previous python-dev discussions: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-November/083315.html https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-September/010718.html [Regarding the ancient mpz module, which used to be part of Python] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2001-December/018967.html -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21922 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21772] platform.uname() not EINTR safe
Stefano Borini added the comment: You can't use subprocess. platform is used during build. subprocess needs select, but select is a compiled module and at that specific time in the build process is not compiled yet. -- nosy: +stefanoborini ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21772 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [issue21772] platform.uname() not EINTR safe
On 08.07.2014 11:40, Stefano Borini wrote: You can't use subprocess. platform is used during build. subprocess needs select, but select is a compiled module and at that specific time in the build process is not compiled yet. Good point :-) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17153] tarfile extract fails when Unicode in pathname
Lars Gustäbel added the comment: IIRC, tarfile under 2.7 has never been explicitly unicode-safe, support for unicode objects is heterogeneous at best. The obvious work-around is to work exclusively with str objects. What we can't do is to decode the utf-8 pathname from the archive to a unicode object, because we have no way to detect an archive's encoding. We can either emit a warning if the user passes a unicode object to extract() or we implicitly encode the passed unicode object using TarFile.encoding, so that the os.path.join() succeeds. Unfortunately, I am not entirely sure if there was possibly a rationale behind the current behaviour of extract(). This needs more inspection. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17153 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21365] asyncio.Task reference misses the most important fact about it, related info spread around intros and example commentary instead
STINNER Victor added the comment: Hi, I pushed my change to add a new BaseEventLoop.create_task() method. For that, I also updated the documentation: http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/66f06fbf8a2f I rewrote the documentation of the Task method, and more generally all places describing how to create a Task object. I changed the first sentence to Schedule the execution of a coroutine object to be the most explicit. The documentation will be readable online in a few hours: https://docs.python.org/dev/library/asyncio-task.html#task Thanks for your report. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21365 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17288] cannot jump from a return after setting f_lineno
Xavier de Gaye added the comment: Python 3.5 is still crashing with this test: $ python jump.py jump.py(7)module() - for i in gen(): (Pdb) break 3 Breakpoint 1 at jump.py:3 (Pdb) continue jump.py(3)gen() - yield i (Pdb) step --Return-- jump.py(3)gen()-0 - yield i (Pdb) jump 2 jump.py(2)gen()-0 - for i in range(1): (Pdb) continue Segmentation fault (core dumped) It is true that frame_setlineno() assumes incorrectly that f-f_stacktop is not NULL, but the reason of the crash or of the SystemError: unknown opcode is that PyEval_EvalFrameEx() expects on its invocation f-f_lasti to refer to the index of the last instruction executed and sets (and assumes this instruction does not have argument) 'next_instr' accordingly to the next byte, while by jumping to line 2 we set f-f_lasti to zero and 'SETUP_LOOP', the opcode at this index, has an argument. The attached patch is a slight improvement over the last one. -- type: behavior - crash versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.7, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35898/default_2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17288 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17288] cannot jump from a return after setting f_lineno
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17288 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21938] Py_XDECREF statement in gen_iternext()
New submission from Xavier de Gaye: The Py_XDECREF statement in gen_iternext() at Objects/genobject.c is not needed since val is NULL (may be optimized out by the compiler). Actually, the whole function could be written as: return gen_send_ex(gen, NULL, 0); -- components: Interpreter Core messages: 222556 nosy: xdegaye priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Py_XDECREF statement in gen_iternext() type: enhancement versions: Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21938 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21937] IDLE interactive window doesn't display unsaved-indicator
Changes by Saimadhav Heblikar saimadhavhebli...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +sahutd ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21937 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1610654] cgi.py multipart/form-data
Hynek Schlawack added the comment: I would have long ago if I had any domain knowlege on this topic, but alas…. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1610654 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21772] platform.uname() not EINTR safe
Stefano Borini added the comment: Wouldn't it make sense to use the same strategy used in the subprocess fix (that is, retry?). See http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6e664bcc958d/ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21772 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19608] devguide needs pictures
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - works for me stage: - resolved status: open - closed type: - enhancement ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19608 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21927] BOM appears in stdin when using Powershell
Ezio Melotti added the comment: I would argue that adding the BOM is a Powershell issue, and I'm not sure Python should do anything about it. There are probably cases where people expects the BOM to be received by python, so stripping it is probably not an option. As for detecting, it should happen automatically only if sys.stdin.encoding is set to 'utf-8-bom', but, by default, Python 3 uses 'UTF-8'. -- nosy: +lemburg, loewis type: - behavior ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21927 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15759] make suspicious doesn't display instructions in case of failure
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Serhiy, your patch LGTM. Can you apply a similar fix for the linkcheck and doctest target and commit it? FWIW the patch produces a slightly different output (in addition to showing the missing message), but I don't think it's a problem: Without patch: ... build finished with problems, 8 warnings. make: *** [build] Error 1 With patch: ... build finished with problems, 8 warnings. make[1]: *** [build] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/wolf/dev/py/py3k/Doc' Suspicious check complete; ... make: *** [suspicious] Error 1 -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15759 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21939] IDLE - Test Percolator
New submission from Saimadhav Heblikar: Attached is a unittest for idlelib.Percolator. 2.7 version will be added once this is OK. -- components: IDLE files: test_percolator-34.diff keywords: patch messages: 222561 nosy: jesstess, sahutd, taleinat, terry.reedy priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: IDLE - Test Percolator versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35899/test_percolator-34.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21939 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21270] unittest.mock.call object has inherited count method
Michael Foord added the comment: Those are the only ones I think. Thanks. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21270 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21940] IDLE - Test WidgetRedirector
New submission from Saimadhav Heblikar: Attached is unittest for idlelib.WidgetRedirector 2.7 version will be uploaded once this is OK. -- components: Extension Modules files: test-widgetredir-34.diff keywords: patch messages: 222563 nosy: jesstess, sahutd, taleinat, terry.reedy priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: IDLE - Test WidgetRedirector versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35900/test-widgetredir-34.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21940 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21907] Update Windows build batch scripts
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 06589e81fd56 by Zachary Ware in branch 'default': Issue #21907: Make the buildbot clean script always return 0. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/06589e81fd56 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21907 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15759] make suspicious doesn't display instructions in case of failure
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Oh, I forgot about this patch. Here is more correct patch. It now works with non-default make command and make suspicious now returns success return code if no suspicious markups were found. Made similar fix for the linkcheck and doctest target. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35901/make_suspicious_2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15759 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21907] Update Windows build batch scripts
Zachary Ware added the comment: The XP buildbot seems to have choked on this change, I suspect because of the 'clean' script exiting with a non-zero error code. I'm not certain why it can't recover, though. David, can you tell what's going on with it? -- nosy: +db3l ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21907 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14953] Reimplement subset of multiprocessing.sharedctypes using memoryview
Richard Oudkerk added the comment: Updated version of the patch. Still needs docs. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35902/memoryview-array-value.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14953 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21844] Fix HTMLParser in unicodeless build
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- dependencies: -Fix unicodeless build of Python stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21844 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21844] Fix HTMLParser in unicodeless build
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- dependencies: +Fix unicodeless build of Python ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21844 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21704] _multiprocessing module builds incorrectly when POSIX semaphores are disabled
Changes by koobs koobs.free...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +koobs ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21704 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20981] ssl doesn't build anymore with OpenSSL 0.9.7 or older: X509_check_ca
Changes by koobs koobs.free...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +koobs ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20981 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20981] ssl doesn't build anymore with OpenSSL 0.9.7 or older: X509_check_ca
Stefan Krah added the comment: FreeBSD 6.4 is EOL though, for quite some time already: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2010-September/001344.html Maybe we should ask the buildbot owner to upgrade to something newer. -- nosy: +skrah ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20981 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5712] tkinter - askopenfilenames returns string instead of tuple in windows 2.6.1 release
Som Veettil added the comment: @Serhiy Storchaka - its Python 2.7.6 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5712 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20104] expose posix_spawn(p)
Danek Duvall added the comment: Our project (the Solaris packaging system, IPS), relies on posix_spawn() primarily for the ability to fork without making a large memory reservation (and possibly failing) because the forking process was itself very large. That's the (a?) bug benefit of posix_spawn() -- it's not a benefit for the programmer using it (who might have to fall back to fork/exec), but for the end-user that benefits from its streamlined operation. You're right that it doesn't handle everything that subprocess.Popen() does -- though at least on Solaris there's a way to change the cwd in the file actions, and I'm sure we'd consider adding a way to do the setsid() as well. The rest should be possible cross-platform. -- nosy: +dhduvall ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20104 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20104] expose posix_spawn(p)
Alex Gaynor added the comment: Danek, you might find https://github.com/dreid/posix_spawn/ useful, it provides bindings and a public API over posix_spawn (it's not complete yet, but if there's stuff missing, feel free to file a ticket!) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20104 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20104] expose posix_spawn(p)
Danek Duvall added the comment: Cool. We implemented our own version as a straight-up native module (https://java.net/projects/ips/sources/pkg-gate/content/src/modules/pspawn.c), and our Popen replacement is not at present a complete replacement for the one in the stdlib, but it does what we need it to do. We'd absolutely switch if it came in to the stdlib, though, and I think there would be plenty of programs that would benefit from it (certainly a number of large Python programs in Solaris have run into exactly this problem). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20104 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5712] tkinter - askopenfilenames returns string instead of tuple in windows 2.6.1 release
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: This bug was fixed in 2.7.7. -- resolution: - duplicate status: open - closed superseder: - Regression: Windows-tkinter-idle, unicode, and 0xxx filename ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5712 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21907] Update Windows build batch scripts
David Bolen added the comment: Interesting - it's got a Visual Studio Just-In-Time Debugger dialog on the screen for an unhandled win32 exception in the compiler (cl.exe). That's a dialog my pop-up AutoIt script wasn't expecting, so I've added it to the other (RTL error) checks, and it'll clear automatically going forward. But I'm not sure what triggered the error. -- David -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21907 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21907] Update Windows build batch scripts
David Bolen added the comment: Ok, the last spurt of exceptions on the XP buildbot in the 3.x branch were all related to the fact that somehow the .hg folder in the 3.x branch build tree was missing. The rest of the build files seemed present. I've removed the build tree completely to let a new checkout take place and restarted the most recent build. There does also appear to have been a test file beneath the build tree that the new clean script couldn't remove (build/test_python_580/@test_580_tmp-?L???.py). I was able to remove it myself interactively from cmd.exe, but I've had problems like this myself when cleaning up temp files on the buildbots sometimes, and believe it has something to do with filename character encodings, depending on the tool being used to reference the file. That might explain the non-zero error on XP though, and I agree that making sure such failures don't propagate seems right. -- David -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21907 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18540] imaplib.IMAP4() ends with Name or service not known on Fedora 18
Milan Oberkirch added the comment: I patched it as you suggested (9 lines added/changed in total). -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35903/imaplib_interpret_empty_string_as_None.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18540 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18540] imaplib.IMAP4() ends with Name or service not known on Fedora 18
Milan Oberkirch added the comment: Ignore what I just did (the test is obviously dump; it fails if you run it on an IMAP server). I'll make a new attempt after a coffee break ;) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18540 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18540] imaplib.IMAP4() ends with Name or service not known on Fedora 18
Milan Oberkirch added the comment: I'm still wondering if the test could be done better. At least it fixes the bug. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35904/imaplib_interpret_empty_string_as_NoneV2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18540 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21918] Convert test_tools to directory
Zachary Ware added the comment: How about this? -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35905/test_tools.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21918 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21918] Convert test_tools to directory
Zachary Ware added the comment: Here's the same patch in --git format, which should make the actual changes clearer (though probably not in Rietveld). -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35906/test_tools.diff--git ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21918 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20513] Python 2.7. Script interruption on logoff from 0 session under Win2003 and earlier
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Looking at PEP 11 and this http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?c2=1163 it seems to depend on which service pack you've got as to whether or not Win2003 is supported by 2.7. Can one of our Windows gurus take a look please, it's as clear as mud to me. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20513 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21918] Convert test_tools to directory
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - zach.ware stage: needs patch - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21918 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15011] Change Scripts to bin on Windows
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk: -- nosy: +steve.dower, zach.ware versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15011 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20513] Python 2.7. Script interruption on logoff from 0 session under Win2003 and earlier
Zachary Ware added the comment: Windows Server 2003, XP, and 2000 are all officially supported by Python 2.7, as they were all current (for certain values of current) at the time Python 2.7 was released. That said, it's not completely clear to me what the bug is but it strikes me as being something that's not all that likely to be hit, and either way about it, I don't have any way to test it. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20513 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21518] Expose RegUnloadKey in winreg
Claudiu Popa added the comment: Here's the patch with only the change for winreg.UnloadKey. I'll have the patch with windows_helper soon. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35907/winreg_unload_key.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21518 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21680] asyncio: document event loops
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 3f1381e3a68f by Victor Stinner in branch '3.4': Issue #21680: Document asyncio event loops http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3f1381e3a68f New changeset 2c9d5f32f6c5 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default': (Merge 3.4) Issue #21680: Document asyncio event loops http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2c9d5f32f6c5 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21680 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21680] asyncio: document event loops
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21680 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21437] document that asyncio.ProactorEventLoop doesn't support SSL
STINNER Victor added the comment: Done in these commits: New changeset 3f1381e3a68f by Victor Stinner in branch '3.4': Issue #21680: Document asyncio event loops http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3f1381e3a68f New changeset 2c9d5f32f6c5 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default': (Merge 3.4) Issue #21680: Document asyncio event loops http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2c9d5f32f6c5 -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21437 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21938] Py_XDECREF statement in gen_iternext()
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 5cfa919609a0 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Issue #21938: simplify gen_iternext() http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5cfa919609a0 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21938 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21938] Py_XDECREF statement in gen_iternext()
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Good point, thanks :) -- nosy: +pitrou resolution: - fixed stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21938 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6931] dreadful performance in difflib: ndiff and HtmlDiff
Christopher Cabanne added the comment: I ran into the slowness of difflib.HtmlDiff.make_table yesterday, and see this issue is three years stale now; is there any update or chance that the fix will be applied? -- nosy: +Christopher.Cabanne ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6931 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6931] dreadful performance in difflib: ndiff and HtmlDiff
Christopher Cabanne added the comment:
Here is a timeit command to test with the attached test files:
python -m timeit -n 10 import difflib;
difflib.HtmlDiff().make_table(open('left500.txt').readlines(),
open('righ500.txt').readlines())
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6931
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6931] dreadful performance in difflib: ndiff and HtmlDiff
Christopher Cabanne added the comment:
Sorry about the typo; here is the corrected timeit command:
python -m timeit -n 10 import difflib;
difflib.HtmlDiff().make_table(open('left500.txt').readlines(),
open('right500.txt').readlines())
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6931
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12815] Coverage of smtpd.py
Changes by Milan Oberkirch milan...@oberkirch.org: -- nosy: +zvyn ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12815 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1610654] cgi.py multipart/form-data
Chui Tey added the comment: Hi, I'm still available. There's a test case in the patch, would you like me to separate that to another file? Would that help with assessing it? Best, On 8 July 2014 22:05, Hynek Schlawack rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Hynek Schlawack added the comment: I would have long ago if I had any domain knowlege on this topic, but alas…. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1610654 ___ -- nosy: +Chui.Tey ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1610654 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21907] Update Windows build batch scripts
David Bolen added the comment: I'm seeing an apparent side-effect of the new clean script (or it seems to correlate). Since it started running, the Windows buildbots (both 7 and XP) seem to always perform a full clone of the master repository for each build rather than just a pull/update. That's a noticeable performance difference (15-20 minutes per clone rather than the more typical 1-2 minutes for pull/update) and seems like it should be unnecessary. I'm not quite sure how the buildbot task makes the decision between the two approaches, but could the new clean be removing a file that's relevant to how the decision is made? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21907 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6916] Remove deprecated items from asynchat
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- stage: needs patch - resolved ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6916 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6916] Remove deprecated items from asynchat
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 486c1a81ee32 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default': Issue #6916: Use assertWarns in test_asynchat. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/486c1a81ee32 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6916 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6931] dreadful performance in difflib: ndiff and HtmlDiff
Changes by Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org: -- assignee: - gregory.p.smith nosy: +gregory.p.smith ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6931 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6931] dreadful performance in difflib: ndiff and HtmlDiff
Changes by Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org: -- versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6931 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21323] CGI HTTP server not running scripts from subdirectories
Zach Byrne added the comment: Hi, I'm new. I wrote a test for nested directories under cgi-bin and got that to pass without failing the test added for 19435 by undoing most of the changes to run_cgi() but building path from the values in self.cgi_info. Thoughts? -- keywords: +patch nosy: +zbyrne Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35908/21323.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21323 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21925] ResouceWarning sometimes doesn't display
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Well, it's unclear to me why we would want to remove the __main__ module first, rather than last. -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21925 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20513] Python 2.7. Script interruption on logoff from 0 session under Win2003 and earlier
Steve Dower added the comment: Looks like a legitimate issue to me, and the patch is fine. It's probably something that ought to be fixed in default too, since I don't see how it is restricted to session 0 - any Python service will incorrectly treat these notifications as interruptions. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Zachary Waremailto:rep...@bugs.python.org Sent: 7/8/2014 15:45 To: Steve Dowermailto:steve.do...@microsoft.com Subject: [issue20513] Python 2.7. Script interruption on logoff from 0 session under Win2003 and earlier Zachary Ware added the comment: Windows Server 2003, XP, and 2000 are all officially supported by Python 2.7, as they were all current (for certain values of current) at the time Python 2.7 was released. That said, it's not completely clear to me what the bug is but it strikes me as being something that's not all that likely to be hit, and either way about it, I don't have any way to test it. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20513 ___ -- title: Python 2.7. Script interruption on logoff from 0 session under Win2003 and earlier - Python 2.7. Script interruption on logoff from 0 session under Win2003 and earlier ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20513 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21911] IndexError: tuple index out of range should include the requested index and tuple length
Josh Rosenberg added the comment: Looking at a single lookup performed over and over isn't going to get you a very good benchmark. If your keys are constantly reused, most of the losses won't show themselves. A more fair comparison I've used before is the difference between using the bytes object produced by bytes.maketrans as the mapping object for str.translate vs. using the dictionary produced by str.maketrans. That gets you the dynamically generated lookups that don't hit the dict optimizations for repeatedly looking up the same key, don't predictably access the same memory that never leaves the CPU cache, etc. Check the timing data I submitted with #21118; the exact same translation applied to the same input strings, with the only difference being whether the table is bytes or dict, takes nearly twice as long using a dict as it does using a bytes object. And the bytes object isn't actually being used efficiently here; str.translate isn't optimized for the buffer protocol or anything, so it's constantly retrieving the cached small ints; a tuple might be even faster by avoiding that minor additional cost. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21911 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21941] Clean up turtle TPen class
New submission from ingrid: There are a lot of methods in the TPen class that are defined but not used because all the child classes overwrite almost all the functions and TPen itself isn't used directly a whole lot. This patch removes the unused code so it's less confusing to read turtle.py. -- components: Library (Lib) files: TPen_cleanup.patch keywords: patch messages: 222598 nosy: ingrid, jesstess priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Clean up turtle TPen class type: enhancement versions: Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35909/TPen_cleanup.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21941 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21942] pydoc source not displayed in browser on Windows
New submission from Eric Galloway: In Python 3 on Windows, pydoc fails to display source file listings in the browser. To reproduce in Python 3.4: 1. start pydoc: python -m pydoc -p 2. Navigate to the url: http://127.0.0.1:/getfile?key=///C:/python34/lib/pydoc.py The error message: getfile?key=///C:/python34/lib/pydoc.py FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '///C:/python34/lib/pydoc.py' The url passed to html_getfile needs to be converted into a NT pathname. -- components: Library (Lib) files: diff.txt messages: 222599 nosy: Eric.Galloway priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: pydoc source not displayed in browser on Windows type: behavior versions: Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35910/diff.txt ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21942 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue6931] dreadful performance in difflib: ndiff and HtmlDiff
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +tim.peters ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6931 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
