New submission from Brandon W Maister quodlibe...@gmail.com:
The comment just before the random.betavariate method reads in part:
## See
## http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbugbug_id=130030group_id=5470
## for Ivan Frohne's insightful analysis of why the original implementation:
## (snip original implementation) was dead wrong, and how it propbably got that
way.
And I would like to read that comment, but the buglink is pretty deeply dead.
I'm not sure what the correct thing to do here is, maybe stick the text of the
bug into the comment, or just update the link.
But I'm definitely curious. Thanks.
--
components: Demos and Tools
messages: 133788
nosy: quodlibetor
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Comment for random.betavariate is intriguing and incomplete
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11848
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
