[issue5945] PyMapping_Check returns 1 for lists
Buck Golemon added the comment: We've hit this problem today. What are we supposed to do in the meantime? -- nosy: +bukzor ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5945 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22722] inheritable pipes are unwieldy without os.pipe2
New submission from Buck Golemon: In order to make an inheritable pipe, the code is quite a bit different between posixes that implement pipe2 and those that don't (osx, mainly). I believe the officially-supported path is to call os.pipe() then os.setinheritable(). This seems objectionable since set_inheritable() code is invoked twice, where I'd prefer to invoke it zero times (or at most once). Would it be acceptable to implement a pipe2 shim for those platforms? If so, I'll (attempt to) provide a patch. Alternatively, can we change the signature of os.pipe() to os.pipe(flags=O_CLOEXEC) ? In my opinion, such a function could be implemented via pipe2 on those platforms that provide it, obviating any need for an os.pipe2. Please tell me which patch to provide, if any. -- messages: 229947 nosy: bukzor priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: inheritable pipes are unwieldy without os.pipe2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22722 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22723] visited-link styling is not accessible
New submission from Buck Golemon: The color needs adjusted such that it has at least 3:1 luminance contrast versus the surrounding non-link text. (See non-inheritable https://docs.python.org/3/library/os.html#os.dup) See also: * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#visual-audio-contrast-without-color * http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/Techniques/working-examples/G183/link-contrast.html Given that the surrounding text is #222, the a:visited color should be bumped from #30306f to #6363bb in order to meet the 3:1 luminance-contrast guideline while preserving the hue and saturation. By the same calculation, the un-visited links are slightly too dark and should be bumped from #00608f to #0072aa Validation was done here: http://juicystudio.com/services/luminositycontrastratio.php Luminance adjustments done here: http://colorizer.org/ -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 229952 nosy: bukzor, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: visited-link styling is not accessible ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22723 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22722] inheritable pipes are unwieldy without os.pipe2
Buck Golemon added the comment: I notice that dup2 grew an `inheritable=True` argument in 3.4. This might be a good precedent to use here, as a third option. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22722 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22723] visited-link styling is not accessible
Buck Golemon added the comment: Proposed patch attached. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file37006/link-color.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22723 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22455] idna/punycode give wrong results on narrow builds
New submission from Buck Golemon: I have fixed the issue in my branch here: https://github.com/bukzor/cpython/commit/013e689731ba32319f05a62a602f01dd7d7f2e83 I don't propose it as a patch, but as a proof of concept and point of discussion. If there's no chance of shipping a fix in 2.7.9, feel free to close. -- messages: 227240 nosy: bukzor priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: idna/punycode give wrong results on narrow builds versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22455 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1243678] httplib gzip support
Buck Golemon added the comment: I believe this issue is still extant. The tip httplib client neither sends accept-encoding gzip nor supports content-encoding gzip. http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/tip/Lib/http/client.py#l1012 There is a diff to httplib in this attached patch, where there was none in #1675951. -- nosy: +Buck.Golemon ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1243678 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15009] urlsplit can't round-trip relative-host urls.
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment: Let's examine x:// absolute-URI = scheme : hier-part [ ? query ] hier-part = // authority path-abempty So this is okay if authority and path-abempty can both be empty strings. authority = [ userinfo @ ] host [ : port ] host = IP-literal / IPv4address / reg-name reg-name = *( unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims ) path-abempty = *( / segment ) Yep. And the same applies for x:///y, except that path-abempty matches /y instead of nothing. This means these are in fact valid urls per RFC3986, counter to your claim. -- nosy: +bukzor ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15009 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15009] urlsplit can't round-trip relative-host urls.
Buck Golemon b...@yelp.com added the comment:
Well i think the real issue is that you can't enumerate the protocals that use
netloc. All protocols are allowed to have a netloc. the smb: protocol
certainly does, but it's not in the list.
The core issue is that smb:/foo and smb:///foo are different urls, and should
be represented differently when split. The /// form has a netloc, it's just the
empty-string. The single-slash form has no netloc, so I propose that
urlsplit('smb:/foo') return SplitResult(scheme='smb', netloc=None, path='/foo',
query='', fragment='')
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15009
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15009] urlsplit can't round-trip relative-host urls.
New submission from Buck Golemon b...@yelp.com:
1) As long as x is valid, I expect that urlunsplit(urlsplit(x)) == x
2) yelp:///foo is a well-formed (albeit odd) url. It it similar to file:///tmp:
it specifies the /foo resource, on the current host, using the yelp protocol
(defined on mobile devices).
from urlparse import urlsplit, urlunsplit
urlunsplit(urlsplit('yelp:///foo'))
'yelp:/foo'
Urlparse / unparse has the same bug:
urlunparse(urlparse('yelp:///foo'))
'yelp:/foo'
The file: protocol seems to be special-case, in an inappropriate manner:
urlunsplit(urlsplit('file:///tmp'))
'file:///tmp'
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 162378
nosy: Buck.Golemon
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: urlsplit can't round-trip relative-host urls.
versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15009
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8326] Cannot import name SemLock on Ubuntu
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment: @Barry: Yes, it's still a problem. The ubuntu 10.10 python2.7 still has no multiprocessing. Since the EOL is April 2012, it needs fixed. It may be considered an invalid python bug, since it seems to be strictly related to Ubuntu packaging, but I thought the python maintainers should know. --Buck -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8326 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8326] Cannot import name SemLock on Ubuntu
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment: python2.7.1+ from mercurial supports sem_open (and multiprocessing) just fine. doko: Could you help us figure out why the ubuntu 10.10 python2.7 build has this issue? I believe this issue should be assigned to you? Relevant lines from the config.log: configure:9566: checking for sem_open configure:9566: gcc -pthread -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lpthread -ldl 5 configure:9566: $? = 0 configure:9566: result: yes -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8326 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8326] Cannot import name SemLock on Ubuntu lucid
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment: Isn't this an Ubuntu problem if sem_open only works with some specific kernels? sem_open works fine (python2.6 is using it), but the python2.7 build process didn't detect it properly. This is either a bug with Ubuntu's python2.7 build configuration, or with python2.7's feature detection for sem_open. I'm not sure which. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8326 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8326] Cannot import name SemLock on Ubuntu
Changes by Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com: -- title: Cannot import name SemLock on Ubuntu lucid - Cannot import name SemLock on Ubuntu ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8326 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8326] Cannot import name SemLock on Ubuntu
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment: I suggest that you try to build from the above mercurial repository and see if the problem persists. How do I know the configuration options that the Ubuntu packager used? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8326 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8326] Cannot import name SemLock on Ubuntu lucid
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment: On Ubuntu 10.10 (maverick), python2.6 is functioning correctly, but python2.7 is giving this error again. $ /usr/bin/python2.7 from multiprocessing.synchronize import Semaphore ImportError: This platform lacks a functioning sem_open implementation, therefore, the required synchronization primitives needed will not function, see issue 3770. -- nosy: +bukzor ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8326 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9583] PYTHONOPTIMIZE = 0 is not honored
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment:
Minimal demo:
$ setenv PYTHONOPTIMIZE 0
$ python3.1 -OO -c print(__debug__)
False
I've used this code to get the desired functionality:
if [[ $TESTING == 1 || ${PYTHONOPTIMIZE-2} =~ '^(0*|)$' ]]; then
#someone is requesting no optimization
export -n PYTHONOPTIMIZE
opt=''
elif [[ $PYTHONOPTIMIZE ]]; then
#someone is setting their own optimization
opt=''
else
#optimization by default
opt='-O'
fi
exec $INSTALL_BASE/bin/python2.6 $opt $@
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9583
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9583] Document startup option/environment interaction
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment:
If I understand this code, it means that PYTHONOPTIMIZE set to 1 or 2 works as
expected, but set to 0, gives a flag value of 1.
static int
add_flag(int flag, const char *envs)
{
int env = atoi(envs);
if (flag env)
flag = env;
if (flag 1)
flag = 1;
return flag;
}
Read literally, the man page indicates that any integer value will give a flag
value of 2.
I agree my shell script is probably unusual, but I believe setting this
environment value to zero and expecting the feature to be off (given no
contradicting options) is reasonable.
I petition to remove the second if statement above (environment value of 0
yields no flag).
I'd also love to provide a numeric argument to -O, to dynamically set this
value more readily, but that is lower importance.
I can implement these and run the unit tests if required.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9583
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9583] Document startup option/environment interaction
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment: that number of times isn't exactly accurate either, since 0 is effectively interpreted as 1. This change would only adversely affect people who use no -O option, set PYTHONOPTIMIZE to '0', and need optimization. I feel like that falls into the realm of version differences, but that's your decision. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9583 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9583] Document startup option/environment interaction
Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com added the comment: The file is here: http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Python/pythonrun.c?view=markup The second if statement is doing exactly what I find troubling: set the flag even if the incoming value is 0. I guess this is to handle the empty string case, such as: setenv PYTHONDEBUG ./myscript.py -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9583 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9583] PYTHONOPTIMIZE = 0 is not honored
New submission from Buck Golemon buck.gole...@amd.com: In our environment, we have a wrapper which enables optimization by default (-OO). Most commandline tools which have a mode-changing flag such as this, also have a flag to do the opposite ( see: ls -t -U, wget -nv -v, ). I'd like to implement one or both of: 1) Add a -D option which is the opposite of -O. python -OO -D gives an optimization level of 1. 2) Honor PYTHONOPTIMIZE = 0. At the least, the man page needs to describe how these two methods interact. -- components: Interpreter Core messages: 113717 nosy: bukzor priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: PYTHONOPTIMIZE = 0 is not honored type: behavior versions: Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9583 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2613] inconsistency with bare * in parameter list
Buck Golemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: /agree ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2613 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2613] inconsistency with bare * in parameter list
Buck Golemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: If there's no difference then they should work the same? I agree there's probably little value in 'fixing' it. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2613 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2950] silly readline module problem
Buck Golemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I'm not sure what your problem is, but comp.lang.python might be a better place to ask. It's not clear that this is a bug yet. http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/topics -- nosy: +bgolemon __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2950 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
