[issue26347] BoundArguments.apply_defaults doesn't handle empty arguments

2016-02-16 Thread Frederick Wagner

Frederick Wagner added the comment:

All right, looks like I have the asterisk now! Looking forward to officially 
contributing to the Python standard library :)

--

___
Python tracker 
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26347>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue26347] BoundArguments.apply_defaults doesn't handle empty arguments

2016-02-11 Thread Frederick Wagner

New submission from Frederick Wagner:

[First-time contributor, feedback appreciated.]

Found and fixed some unexpected behavior in 
inspect.BoundArguments.apply_defaults. Simplest explanation is the following 
test that I added:

# Make sure a no-args binding still acquires proper defaults.
def foo(a='spam'): pass
sig = inspect.signature(foo)
ba = sig.bind()
ba.apply_defaults()
self.assertEqual(list(ba.arguments.items()), [('a', 'spam')])

I've included the patch file; is there anything else I can do?

--
components: Library (Lib), Tests
files: 0001-Make-apply_defaults-work-for-empty-arguments.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 260157
nosy: Frederick Wagner
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: BoundArguments.apply_defaults doesn't handle empty arguments
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6
Added file: 
http://bugs.python.org/file41906/0001-Make-apply_defaults-work-for-empty-arguments.patch

___
Python tracker 
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26347>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com