[issue47169] Stable ABI: Some optional (#ifdef'd) functions aren't handled correctly

2022-04-01 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Solaris is affected by missing `PyThread_get_thread_native_id`; all other 
symbols from the SYMBOL_NAMES tuple (in test_stable_abi_ctypes.py) are 
available.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue47169>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue47169] Stable ABI: Some optional (#ifdef'd) functions aren't handled correctly

2022-04-01 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
nosy: +kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue47169>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue44133] Some C-API symbols (e.g. Py_FrozenMain) are not always exported on Unix

2022-04-01 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Yes, it still does, and PyThread_get_thread_native_id is the only symbol 
missing.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44133>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue47058] Skip tests failing on Solaris

2022-03-18 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
title: Skip tests failing on Solaris worker -> Skip tests failing on Solaris

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue47058>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue47058] Skip tests failing on Solaris worker

2022-03-18 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +30068
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31978

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue47058>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue47058] Skip tests failing on Solaris worker

2022-03-18 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

There are several tests failing on the recently added Solaris buildbot worker. 
This Issue aims to fix/skip the to make Solaris green on buildbot.


## test_posix ##


Issues with the `os.sched_get_priority_min`; fix offered here: 
https://bugs.python.org/issue41839

#
## test_shutil ##
#

Issues with `sendfile` being disabled on Solaris (and test suite not being able 
to handle that); fix offered here: https://bugs.python.org/issue41843

#
## test_locale ##
#

Strxfrm does not work in the current implementation due to the difference in 
Solaris locale encoding (most of which was solved with 
https://bugs.python.org/issue43667).

Internally we have fixed this issue with:
https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/blob/master/components/python/python39/patches/24-strxfrm-fix.patch

But this idea was previously rejected in https://bugs.python.org/issue16258

Because of that, those tests are skipped on Solaris in the attached PR.

#
## test_re ##
#

On SPARC there are some weird matches in some regexes:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ".../build/Lib/test/test_re.py", line 1907, in test_locale_caching
self.check_en_US_utf8()
  File ".../build/Lib/test/test_re.py", line 1924, in check_en_US_utf8
self.assertIsNone(re.match(b'\xc5', b'\xe5', re.L|re.I))
AssertionError:  is not None

I have no idea why this is happening. I presume it is locale related, but I 
didn't find anything problematic yet.

The simplest way to reproduce this is (meaning that this probably isn't caching 
related):
```
import locale
import re

locale.setlocale(locale.LC_CTYPE, 'en_US.utf8')
print(re.match(b'\xc5', b'\xe5', re.L|re.I))
```

This returns:
 on Solaris and None on Linux.

I am happy to investigate it further; any pointers as for where to look would 
be appreciated as I am stuck a little bit.

#
## test_socket ##
#

There are two issues here. The first one is similar to what BSD, Darwin and AIX 
experience with testFDPass tests:
https://bugs.python.org/issue22397
https://bugs.python.org/issue12958
These tests are skipped on Solaris in the attached PR.

The other one is an incorrect assumption about CMSG_SPACE on SPARC Solaris; it 
grows slightly sooner when increasing length compared to other platforms I 
tested.

with toobig == 2147483632
length socket.CMSG_SPACE output
2147483619 2147483632
2147483620 2147483632
2147483621 2147483640
2147483622 2147483640
2147483623 2147483640
2147483624 2147483640
2147483625 2147483640
2147483626 2147483640
2147483627 2147483640
2147483628 2147483640
2147483629  <- OverflowError

==
ERROR: testCMSG_SPACE (test.test_socket.CmsgMacroTests)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/builds/jkulik/testing/components/python/python39/Python-3.9.9/Lib/test/test_socket.py",
 line 3360, in testCMSG_SPACE
ret = socket.CMSG_SPACE(n)
OverflowError: CMSG_SPACE() argument out of range

(on other platforms, increases generally happen with lengths divisible by 8, 
meaning that it gets all the way to 2147483631).

I am unsure how to fix this (currently, PR includes change we use internally 
but is likely not acceptable) as I don't know how to correctly guess the 
largest CMSG_SPACE on all platforms. Is it even necessary though (it can test 
OverflowError on other values than just the first failing one and can end 
slightly sooner)?

###
## test_time ##
###

This was recently fixed with: https://bugs.python.org/issue46099

--
components: Tests
messages: 415493
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Skip tests failing on Solaris worker
versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue47058>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue44133] Some C-API symbols (e.g. Py_FrozenMain) are not always exported on Unix

2022-01-17 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Ah, sorry, I could have described the issue better. It's not a problem with 
exporting, PyThread_get_thread_native_id() isn't available on Solaris (and 
possibly other platforms) at all.

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Include/pythread.h#L28
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Python/thread_pthread.h#L329

The reason I didn't implement it yet is that Solaris doesn't expose anything 
like native thread id. We do have functions like `_lwp_self()` or 
`pthread_self()` or `thr_self()` but neither of them returns id where "value 
may be used to uniquely identify this particular thread system-wide". (I 
presume that means that no other thread of no other process running on a given 
system would return the same number - all these functions return single digit 
numbers so there is no way they are unique system wide).

If necessary, I guess that such a number can be created by masking pid and 
thread id together, but then there's a question of how it is supposed to be 
used (because OS would not understand it).

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44133>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue40066] Enum: modify __repr__, __str__; update docs

2022-01-17 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

This also broke our Solaris build with the following error:

==
FAIL: testGetaddrinfo (test.test_socket.GeneralModuleTests)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "//cpython-main/Lib/test/test_socket.py", line 1523, in 
testGetaddrinfo
self.assertEqual(repr(type), '')
^^^
AssertionError: '' != ''
- 
?  ^
+ 
?  ^

(test.test_socket.GeneralModuleTests fails with the same error).

The issue is almost certainly that on Solaris, SOCK_STREAM is defined as 2 
rather than 1; the following simple program confirms that:

#include 
#include 

void main() {
printf("%d\n", SOCK_STREAM);
}

I'm just not sure whether to fix this with `assertRegex` or a special branch 
for Solaris (though I am not sure whether everybody else uses 1 or it's more 
varied).

--
nosy: +kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40066>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue44133] Some C-API symbols (e.g. Py_FrozenMain) are not always exported on Unix

2022-01-17 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

>> On Solaris (and most likely several other platforms), 
>> `PyThread_get_thread_native_id` is also not available.

> Oh, I added an explicit test for that in my PR 30556.

Now it started failing on a different place:

==
FAIL: test_export_symbols (test.test_capi.CAPITest) 
(name='PyThread_get_thread_native_id')
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "//cpython-main/Lib/test/test_capi.py", line 662, in 
test_export_symbols
self.assertTrue(hasattr(ctypes.pythonapi, name))

AssertionError: False is not true

Looking at the test, is the expectation that all OSes must implement it since 
3.11?

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44133>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue46099] Solaris: Fix pthread_getcpuclockid test

2021-12-16 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +28358
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30140

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46099>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue46099] Solaris: Fix pthread_getcpuclockid test

2021-12-16 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

On Solaris, when `pthread_getcpuclockid()` is called with current thread id as 
an argument, it returns `CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID`.

==
FAIL: test_pthread_getcpuclockid (test.test_time.TimeTestCase)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/var/share/buildbot-worker/default/3.9.kulikjak-solaris-sparcv9/build/Lib/test/test_time.py",
 line 116, in test_pthread_getcpuclockid
self.assertNotEqual(clk_id, time.CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID)
AssertionError: 2 == 2

Based on the test code, 32bit AIX seems to do the same thing so I added another 
similar code for Solaris.

--
components: Tests
messages: 408694
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Solaris: Fix pthread_getcpuclockid test
versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46099>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue44133] Some C-API symbols (e.g. Py_FrozenMain) are not always exported

2021-11-25 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

On Solaris (and most likely several other platforms), 
`PyThread_get_thread_native_id` is also not available.

--
nosy: +kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44133>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue44935] Solaris: enable posix_spawn in subprocess

2021-08-17 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +26264
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/27795

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44935>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue44935] Solaris: enable posix_spawn in subprocess

2021-08-17 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

Solaris also provides posix_spawn() syscall that can/should be used in the 
subprocess module to spawn new processes.

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 399750
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Solaris: enable posix_spawn in subprocess
versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44935>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43498] "dictionary changed size during iteration" error in _ExecutorManagerThread

2021-08-04 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I think that even if copy() doesn't fix it entirely, it's still much better 
than nothing. I never encountered the issue mentioned in bpo-40327, but I saw 
this issue several times a week (before applying the proposed patch).

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43498>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43219] shutil.copy raises IsADirectoryError when the directory does not actually exist

2021-07-20 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +25802
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/27257

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43219>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43219] shutil.copy raises IsADirectoryError when the directory does not actually exist

2021-07-20 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

On Solaris (I checked this on Oracle and SmartOS), the error is:

  NotADirectoryError: [Errno 20] Not a directory: 'not_a_dir/'

which I think belongs to the 'errors are not confusing' category with Windows 
and macOS.

--
nosy: +kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43219>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43667] Solaris: Fix broken Unicode encoding in non-UTF locales

2021-05-27 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +24998
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26405

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43667>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43667] Solaris: Fix broken Unicode encoding in non-UTF locales

2021-05-25 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Sorry for delayed response.

Considering that we are not delivering or using 3.8 in any way and this issue 
doesn't seem to impact anybody else, we can omit the backport to 3.8. I will 
prepare another PR with a news fragment, and after that, this can be considered 
solved and closed.

--
versions: +Python 3.11 -Python 3.8

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43667>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41843] Reenable sendfile in shutil.copyfile() on Solaris

2021-05-21 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Based on the comment https://bugs.python.org/issue43743#msg393429 I think my 
question is answered: #36610 should not be reverted. Attached PR (which merely 
adds Solaris to systems where _USE_CP_SENDFILE is True) should thus be the 
preferred way of reenabling this.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41843>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43667] Solaris: Fix broken Unicode encoding in non-UTF locales

2021-05-03 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
components: +Unicode -Tests
versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 3.11

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43667>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43667] Solaris: Fix broken Unicode encoding in non-UTF locales

2021-05-03 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +24530
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25847

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43667>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43498] "dictionary changed size during iteration" error in _ExecutorManagerThread

2021-04-15 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I investigated a little bit more and found out that this happens when 
`ProcessPoolExecutor::_adjust_process_count()` adds a new process during the 
iteration.

With the following change, I can reproduce this reliably every time:

--- Python-3.9.1/Lib/concurrent/futures/process.py
+++ Python-3.9.1/Lib/concurrent/futures/process.py
@@ -373,7 +373,14 @@ class _ExecutorManagerThread(threading.T
 assert not self.thread_wakeup._closed
 wakeup_reader = self.thread_wakeup._reader
 readers = [result_reader, wakeup_reader]
-worker_sentinels = [p.sentinel for p in self.processes.values()]
+worker_sentinels = []
+for p in self.processes.values():
+time.sleep(1)
+worker_sentinels.append(p.sentinel)
 ready = mp.connection.wait(readers + worker_sentinels)
 
 cause = None

Since `wait_result_broken_or_wakeup()` is called periodically, and there is no 
issue if processes added during the iteration are omitted (if they were added 
just after that, they would be omitted anyway), the attached PR shouldn't break 
anything.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43498>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43667] Solaris: Fix broken Unicode encoding in non-UTF locales

2021-03-30 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I forgot to mention: this affects Oracle Solaris. I tested this on SmartOS, and 
I cannot reproduce it there as it seems that they are using Unicode 
representation for all locales. Based on the documentation, this might also 
affect other systems as well (e.g. HP UIX specifically says: 'These values may 
not be compatible with values obtained by specifying other locales that are 
supported'), but it's hard to tell without testing that.

This one liner breaks with ValueError: character U+3069 is not in range 
[U+; U+10] if the issue is present:
python3.7 -c 'import datetime; import locale; 
locale.setlocale(locale.LC_ALL,"es_ES.ISO8859-1"); datetime.date(2001, 1, 
3).strftime("%a")'

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43667>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43667] Solaris: Fix broken Unicode encoding in non-UTF locales

2021-03-30 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +23840
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25096

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43667>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43667] Solaris: Fix broken Unicode encoding in non-UTF locales

2021-03-30 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

On Linux, wchar_t values are mapped to their UTF-8 counterparts; however, that 
does not have to be the case as the standard allows any arbitrary 
representation to be used, and this is the case for Solaris.

In Oracle Solaris, the internal form of wchar_t is specific to a locale; in the 
Unicode locales, wchar_t has the UTF-32 Unicode encoding form, and other 
locales have different representations [1].

This is an issue because Python expects wchar_t to correspond with Unicode, 
which on Oracle Solaris with non-UTF locale results either in errors (values 
are outside the Unicode range) or in output with different symbols.

Unicode locales work as expected, but they are not an acceptable workaround for 
some Oracle Solaris users that cannot use Unicode encoding for various reasons.


Because of that, we fixed it a few months ago with a patch to 
`PyUnicode_FromWideChar`, which handles conversion to unicode (attached in PR). 
It was tested over the last half a year, and we didn't see any related issues 
since.

Is something like this acceptable or should it be fixed on a different place/in 
a different way? All comments are appreciated.

[1] https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E36784_01/html/E39536/gmwkm.html

--
components: Unicode
messages: 389813
nosy: ezio.melotti, kulikjak, vstinner
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Solaris: Fix broken Unicode encoding in non-UTF locales
versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43667>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43498] "dictionary changed size during iteration" error in _ExecutorManagerThread

2021-03-15 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +23630
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24868

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43498>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue43498] "dictionary changed size during iteration" error in _ExecutorManagerThread

2021-03-15 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

Recently several of our Python 3.9 builds froze during `make install` with the 
following trace in logs:

Listing 
.../components/python/python39/build/prototype/sparc/usr/lib/python3.9/lib2to3/tests/data/fixers/myfixes...
Exception in thread Thread-1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
".../components/python/python39/build/prototype/sparc/usr/lib/python3.9/threading.py",
 line 954, in _bootstrap_inner
self.run()
  File 
".../components/python/python39/build/prototype/sparc/usr/lib/python3.9/concurrent/futures/process.py",
 line 317, in run
result_item, is_broken, cause = self.wait_result_broken_or_wakeup()
  File 
".../components/python/python39/build/prototype/sparc/usr/lib/python3.9/concurrent/futures/process.py",
 line 376, in wait_result_broken_or_wakeup
worker_sentinels = [p.sentinel for p in self.processes.values()]
  File 
".../components/python/python39/build/prototype/sparc/usr/lib/python3.9/concurrent/futures/process.py",
 line 376, in 
worker_sentinels = [p.sentinel for p in self.processes.values()]
RuntimeError: dictionary changed size during iteration

After this, the build freezes and never ends (most likely waiting for the 
broken thread).

We see this only in Python 3.9 (3.7 doesn't seem to be affected, and we don't 
deliver other versions) and only when doing full builds of the entire Userland, 
meaning that this might be related to big utilization of the build machine? 
That said, it only happened three or four times, so this might be just a 
coincidence.

Simple fix seems to be this (PR shortly):

--- Python-3.9.1/Lib/concurrent/futures/process.py
+++ Python-3.9.1/Lib/concurrent/futures/process.py
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ class _ExecutorManagerThread(threading.T
 assert not self.thread_wakeup._closed
 wakeup_reader = self.thread_wakeup._reader
 readers = [result_reader, wakeup_reader]
-worker_sentinels = [p.sentinel for p in self.processes.values()]
+worker_sentinels = [p.sentinel for p in self.processes.copy().values()]
 ready = mp.connection.wait(readers + worker_sentinels)
 
 cause = None


This is on Oracle Solaris and on both SPARC and Intel machines.

--
components: Installation, asyncio
messages: 388712
nosy: asvetlov, kulikjak, yselivanov
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: "dictionary changed size during iteration" error in 
_ExecutorManagerThread
type: crash
versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43498>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41843] Reenable sendfile in shutil.copyfile() on Solaris

2020-12-22 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +22748
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23893

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41843>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19561] request to reopen Issue837046 - pyport.h redeclares gethostname() if SOLARIS is defined

2020-12-22 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 2.7, Python 3.3

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19561>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37232] Parallel compilation fails because of low ulimit.

2020-12-21 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I am closing this as it is true that the limit on files of 256 is pretty low, 
and no matter how robust you make it, arbitrarily low ulimits will crash it 
anyway.

--
resolution:  -> not a bug
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37232>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42277] Solaris & PEP 3149: start using ABI version tagged .so files

2020-12-21 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
resolution:  -> duplicate
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42277>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42277] Solaris & PEP 3149: start using ABI version tagged .so files

2020-12-21 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

This was resolved with issue 42604 and PR 23708.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42277>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42655] Fix subprocess extra_groups gid conversion

2020-12-20 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I checked and indeed there seems to be no reason as for why should we use `void 
*` rather than `gid_t *` and `uid_t *`. I changed that in the attached PR.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42655>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42655] Fix subprocess extra_groups gid conversion

2020-12-16 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +22655
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23762

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42655>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42655] Fix subprocess extra_groups gid conversion

2020-12-16 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

C function `subprocess_fork_exec` incorrectly transforms gids from the 
`extra_groups` argument because it passes `unsigned long*` rather than `pid_t*` 
into the `_Py_Gid_Converter()`. Assuming that `gid_t` is 32 bit and `unsigned 
long` is 64 bit (which it often is), `*(gid_t *)p = gid;` then incorrectly 
overwrites only part of that variable, leaving the other one filled with 
previous garbage.

I found this on Solaris, but I am pretty sure that this doesn't work correctly 
on Linux as well, since both use `unsigned int` as `gid_t`.

--
components: Extension Modules
messages: 383132
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Fix subprocess extra_groups gid conversion
versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42655>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41818] Lib/pty.py major revision

2020-11-27 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

This change also broke Solaris (SunOS), where (similarly to BSDs and Darwin) 
OSError is not raised in the `new test_master_read()` test.

Adding `or PLATFORM == "SunOS"` into the `expectedFailureOnBSD` function fixes 
this issue, but it's no longer just BSDs and it's derivates.

--
nosy: +kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41818>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19561] request to reopen Issue837046 - pyport.h redeclares gethostname() if SOLARIS is defined

2020-11-09 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +22106
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23208

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19561>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19561] request to reopen Issue837046 - pyport.h redeclares gethostname() if SOLARIS is defined

2020-11-09 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

And for the reference, Solaris distros are already removing this code:

https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/blob/master/components/python/python37/patches/15-gethostname.patch
https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/components/python/python37/patches/15-gethostname.patch
https://github.com/omniosorg/omnios-build/blob/master/build/python37/patches/15-gethostname.patch

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19561>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19561] request to reopen Issue837046 - pyport.h redeclares gethostname() if SOLARIS is defined

2020-11-09 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I think this code should be removed.

It was added in its current form more than 20 years ago with the intention to 
add function declarations missing from system include files:
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/1e0c2f4bee43728930bd5f4dc77283f09c4ba004

Today, every Solaris system should have gethostname() available in unistd.h. I 
am not sure when exactly was it added, but it was available in the OpenSolaris 
since the first commit (year 2005):
https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/blame/master/usr/src/head/unistd.h#L344


Also, AFAIK, 'SOLARIS' macro is not predefined on Solaris systems in compiler 
preprocessors today *; hence, unless compiled with `-DSOLARIS`, this code has 
no effect.

*) I tested this with several GCC [7|9|10] and Solaris studio and neither of 
those defined it. It seems like it might have worked many years ago, but it 
certainly isn't a way to #ifdef Solaris today.

--
nosy: +kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19561>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41839] Solaris: Fix error checking in sched_get_priority_ functions

2020-11-06 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

> Checking for -1 rather than all negative values fixes this issue.

To be 100% exact, it should be "checking for -1 and errno" (as other Jakub 
noted in the PR). Here is the standard for reference:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sched_get_priority_min.html

Sticking to it should hopefully not break anything.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41839>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42277] Solaris & PEP 3149: start using ABI version tagged .so files

2020-11-06 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +22088
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23182

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42277>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42277] Solaris & PEP 3149: start using ABI version tagged .so files

2020-11-06 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

Solaris doesn't have ABI version tagged .so files enabled in upstream CPython 
yet, but almost every Solaris distribution* patches this functionality in:

Oracle Solaris: 
https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/blob/master/components/python/python39/patches/13-SOABI.patch
OpenIndiana: 
https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/components/python/python37/patches/13-SOABI.patch
OmniOS: 
https://github.com/omniosorg/omnios-build/blob/master/build/python37/patches/13-SOABI.patch

Because of that, I think it should be merged into master.

*) The only exception is pkgsrc (used in SmartOS), but they are patching it out 
for every system, so no change there:
https://github.com/joyent/pkgsrc/blob/trunk/lang/python39/patches/patch-configure

--
components: Build
messages: 380449
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Solaris & PEP 3149: start using ABI version tagged .so files
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.10

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42277>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42237] test_socket.SendfileUsingSendfileTest fails on illumos

2020-11-04 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
versions: +Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42237>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42237] test_socket.SendfileUsingSendfileTest fails on illumos

2020-11-04 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I did some further digging, and this is indeed not possible on Oracle Solaris 
(that is, sendfile() cannot write bytes and fail during the same call). We 
considered this a bug and changed/fixed it several years ago.

Manual page doesn't mention that either:
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E88353_01/html/E37843/sendfile-3c.html

I am not sure whether Illumos will want to change this as well (probably not 
since it is mentioned in the man page as expected behavior), but either way, 
the proposed change doesn't harm Oracle Solaris because 'if (offset != 
original_offset)' can never be true.

--
nosy: +kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42237>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35455] Solaris: thread_time doesn't work with current implementation

2020-11-04 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
versions:  -Python 3.7

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35455>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35455] Solaris: thread_time doesn't work with current implementation

2020-11-04 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +22057
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23145

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35455>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35455] Solaris: thread_time doesn't work with current implementation

2020-11-02 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
versions: +Python 3.10

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35455>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35455] Solaris: thread_time doesn't work with current implementation

2020-11-02 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
title: Solaris thread_time doesn't work with current implementation -> Solaris: 
thread_time doesn't work with current implementation

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35455>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35455] Solaris thread_time doesn't work with current implementation

2020-11-02 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Comment from https://bugs.python.org/issue42173#msg380205 confirmed that this 
issue is still relevant to Illumos based systems. Because of that, I am happy 
to resolve it.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35455>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42173] Drop Solaris support

2020-11-02 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Thanks Andy, good to know we are seeing the same issue!

We tried to fix sendfile differences in Python code before as well, but as you 
said, it was never 100% solved. Recently we finally fixed it in C and it was 
accepted (https://bugs.python.org/issue41687) and backported to 3.9 so you 
might/should be ok without the patch as well.

CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID was issue for us as well but before the patch was 
accepted upstream, Oracle Solaris implemented it so it was no longer necessary. 
But the issue is still open https://bugs.python.org/issue35455 and knowing that 
others will use it, I will dust it off and finish it.

Knowing that Oracle and Illumos are facing the same issues, I am much more 
confident that our patches won't break Illumos. I will start upstream more of 
them right away.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42173>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42173] Drop Solaris support

2020-11-02 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I ran the test and the results are attached (the first one is a complete test 
and the other one failed tests in verbose mode).

I checked the failing tests and divided them into several groups:

issues already reported:
  test_asyncio - reported and being solved here: 
https://bugs.python.org/issue38323
  test_posix - problem with return values, reported here: 
https://bugs.python.org/issue41839
  test_shutil - sendfile for Solaris was disabled in the library, but not in 
the test suite, which leads to the issues (I asked about reenabling here: 
https://bugs.python.org/issue41843; that would solve the issue)

these failures are probably related to our internal network settings (false 
positives):
  test_ssl, test_urllib, test_urllib2, test_urllib2_localnet

other:
  test_float - locale related *
  test_locale - locale related *
  test_re - most likely locale related *
  test_socket - known issues not yet reported upstream (not ready for 
acceptable PR)
  test_time - one locale related * and other not yet known
  test_tcl - yet to investigate

*) Locale related failures are due to wchar_t differences between the Linux 
world and ours. It's something we resolved very recently and have yet to rework 
it into an upstreamable form and report it.

It would be interesting to see Illumos results as well, because while also 
Solaris, there might be differences due to almost ten years of spit development.

--
Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file49558/Oracle_Solaris_full_test.txt

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42173>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42173] Drop Solaris support

2020-11-02 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file49559/Oracle_Solaris_detailed_test.txt

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42173>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue42173] Drop Solaris support

2020-10-30 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Hi, here I am passing on several notes from the Oracle Solaris team:

- Oracle continues to develop and advance Oracle Solaris technology, and have 
committed to doing so for years to come. We release a new update (so called 
SRU) every month 
(https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris/oracle-solaris%3a-update-to-the-continuous-delivery-model).
- Python is essential for Oracle Solaris and actively worked on. In fact, we 
recently finished migration to Python 3.7 and integrated Python 3.9, which will 
be released to customers soon.
- Internally, we are performing daily testing for each Python version from 3.7+ 
and reporting any issues that are found* (fortunately, there are not many of 
them because Python works very well!).
- Python 3 is running for more than a year now on any machine running Oracle 
Solaris 11.4.
- Looking at six download statistics is very misleading because we are 
packaging Python and its modules in Solaris packages. This package is essential 
(meaning that every Oracle Solaris machine will have it installed). Also, we 
are caching archives internally, so unless customers download a newer version 
into a virtual environment, you won't see more than a few downloads from Oracle 
Solaris (which are then distributed onto thousands of machines running Oracle 
Solaris).
- We are looking at how to provide build bots running on Oracle Solaris.
- We are trying to be part of the Python community and also put back Solaris 
specific fixes (we provide patches for many of those issues reported).
- It is certainly much better (hopefully for everyone) to resolve any specific 
Solaris issues and help with the maintenance within the Python community than 
do this just internally as part of Oracle Solaris development.

*) everything reported by me are Solaris related issues

Jakub

--
nosy: +kulikjak -sugondesenuts007

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42173>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue27777] cgi.FieldStorage can't parse simple body with Content-Length and no Content-Disposition

2020-09-25 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

We internally tested the most recent PR and found some issues with it:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21457#issuecomment-698845895

We ended up using a much simpler patch, which seems to work as expected.

--- Python-3.7.8/Lib/cgi.py
+++ Python-3.7.8/Lib/cgi.py
@@ -703,7 +703,10 @@
 if not data:
 self.done = -1
 break
-self.file.write(data)
+if self._binary_file:
+self.file.write(data)
+else:
+self.file.write(data.decode())
 todo = todo - len(data)
 
 def read_lines(self):

--
nosy: +kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue2>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41843] Reenable sendfile in shutil.copyfile() on Solaris

2020-09-23 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

The use of sendfile() in shutil.copyfile() on Solaris was previously disabled 
in #36610 due to slightly different behavior. This difference was recently 
accounted for in #41687, and I observed no other unexpected 
problems/differences with sendfile.

Can we get this reenabled? I can prepare PR, however, I am not sure whether 
#36610 should be reverted (hence enabling sendfile in copyfile on every system 
where it is available) or whether I should just add Solaris to _USE_CP_SENDFILE 
condition.

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 377383
nosy: giampaolo.rodola, kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Reenable sendfile in shutil.copyfile() on Solaris
type: performance
versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41843>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41839] Fix error checking in sched_get_priority_ functions

2020-09-23 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
versions: +Python 3.8

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41839>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41839] Fix error checking in sched_get_priority_ functions

2020-09-23 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +21413
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22374

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41839>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41839] Fix error checking in sched_get_priority_ functions

2020-09-23 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

Python presumes that any negative number returned from sched_get_priority_min 
or sched_get_priority_max indicates that error has occurred. However, neither 
Linux manual pages nor POSIX.1-2001 specification forbids negative values to be 
returned; only -1 has a special meaning for error.

On Solaris, sched_get_priority_min can, in some instances, return -60, and 
while this is a legitimate scheduling priority value, Python throws an OSError. 
Checking for -1 rather than all negative values fixes this issue.

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 377363
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Fix error checking in sched_get_priority_ functions
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41839>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35520] Python won't build with dtrace enabled on some systems.

2020-09-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

No more non-security related backports to 3.7 allowed.

--
resolution:  -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35520>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41687] sendfile implementation is not compatible with Solaris

2020-09-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I just realized that the recently merged PR has broken error handling, so I 
opened another one with a followup fix.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41687>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41687] sendfile implementation is not compatible with Solaris

2020-09-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +21209
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22128

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41687>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue33802] Regression in logging configuration

2020-09-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
nosy:  -kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33802>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue36533] logging regression with threading + fork are mixed in 3.7.1rc2 (deadlock potential)

2020-09-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
nosy:  -kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36533>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue33802] Regression in logging configuration

2020-09-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests:  -21199

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33802>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue36533] logging regression with threading + fork are mixed in 3.7.1rc2 (deadlock potential)

2020-09-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests:  -21198

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36533>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue6721] Locks in the standard library should be sanitized on fork

2020-09-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests:  -21197

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue6721>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue6721] Locks in the standard library should be sanitized on fork

2020-09-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
nosy:  -kulikjak

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue6721>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue33802] Regression in logging configuration

2020-09-05 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
nosy: +kulikjak
nosy_count: 7.0 -> 8.0
pull_requests: +21199
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22040

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33802>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue36533] logging regression with threading + fork are mixed in 3.7.1rc2 (deadlock potential)

2020-09-05 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
nosy: +kulikjak
nosy_count: 7.0 -> 8.0
pull_requests: +21198
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22040

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36533>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue6721] Locks in the standard library should be sanitized on fork

2020-09-05 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
nosy: +kulikjak
nosy_count: 27.0 -> 28.0
pull_requests: +21197
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22040

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue6721>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41687] sendfile implementation is not compatible with Solaris

2020-09-01 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +21137
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22040

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41687>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue41687] sendfile implementation is not compatible with Solaris

2020-09-01 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

Hi,

Sendfile on Solaris raises EINVAL if offset is equal or bigger than the size of 
the file. This is different from Linux, where similar sendfile call returns 0, 
which is used in an ad-hoc fashion to indicate EOF. Since Python sendfile 
implementation expects 0 to be returned, it breaks. I already reported this in 
issue 36610, which led to sendfile eventually being disabled on Solaris to be 
safe before the 3.8 release.

We were first looking into a possibility to change Solaris behavior of sendfile 
to reflect that of Linux but decided not to because of the significant risk 
that it can break existing programs. The other reason is that sendfile isn't 
standardized (Linux manpage explicitly states that) and hence Solaris 
implementation isn't broken, just different. Because of that, we patched the 
runtime and added #ifdef branch (of which there are already many due to os 
differences) with additional offset check. It is tested with the current master 
and also 3.7, which we are using internally.

Thanks

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 376191
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: sendfile implementation is not compatible with Solaris
versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41687>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37573] asyncio: freeze when using MultiLoopChildWatcher on Solaris

2020-05-14 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

You are right, that seems to be the same issue. Thanks for closing this.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37573>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35455] Solaris thread_time doesn't work with current implementation

2020-04-08 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Correction: looking at the PR, I made it so that it checks for SunOS, so even 
with CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID available, new code would be executed. 

So if you believe that this should be implemented for other SunOSes, I can do 
it ;).

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35455>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35455] Solaris thread_time doesn't work with current implementation

2020-04-08 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I was speaking for Oracle Solaris 11.4, where CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID is now 
implemented (and we don't need it in older releases). But you are right that 
other Solaris/SunOS versions might not have this and hence would find this 
useful.

I can rebase and reopen the original PR, but I cannot test it that well now 
that our Solaris doesn't use that part of the code (I can change the #define 
for testing, that should be sufficient).

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35455>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue38110] Use fdwalk() within os.closerange() impl if available

2019-09-11 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +15581
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15224

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38110>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37785] argparse uses %s in gettext calls causing xgettext warnings

2019-08-12 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Thanks,

I see; this is not a change for security only stage. I merged your suggestion.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37785>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35484] Segmentation fault due to faulthandler on Solaris

2019-08-08 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Oh, thanks for the catch, it most likely is.

--
resolution:  -> duplicate
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35484>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37785] argparse uses %s in gettext calls causing xgettext warnings

2019-08-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +14894
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15161

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37785>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37785] argparse uses %s in gettext calls causing xgettext warnings

2019-08-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
title: argparse uses %s in gettext calls -> argparse uses %s in gettext calls 
causing xgettext warnings

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37785>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37785] argparse uses %s in gettext calls

2019-08-07 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

Running xgettext on argparse.py (of any currently supported Python 3.x) return 
following warning:

./Lib/argparse.py: warning: 'msgid' format string with unnamed arguments cannot 
be properly localized: The translator cannot reorder the arguments. Please 
consider using a format string with named arguments, and a mapping instead of a 
tuple for the arguments.

Same problem was already partially fixed here: 
https://bugs.python.org/issue10528. I guess that this occurrence was either 
missed or is new since.

It would be nice to have this backported to all supported releases but 
considering incompatibility worries in issue linked above, it may be fixed only 
in 3.8+ (which is still nice).

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 349166
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: argparse uses %s in gettext calls
versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37785>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37573] asyncio: freeze when using MultiLoopChildWatcher on Solaris

2019-07-12 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

Hi,

since the 3.8.0b2 test_asyncio freezes in test_subprocess when 
MultiLoopChildWatcher is being used as a watcher (new in b2). All other 
watchers are working as expected. This is all on Solaris.

I tried to find out the reason for these issues and it seems that awaited 
coroutines never end (there are many tests with this problem - I tested it on 
test_cancel_make_subprocess_transport_exec). I found out that commenting out 
`signal.siginterrupt(signal.SIGCHLD, False)` in `attach_loop` method of 
MultiLoopChildWatcher seems to fix the issue, however, I don't understand this 
enough to see why that should be a problem...

I can provide more information if necessary.

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 347743
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: asyncio: freeze when using MultiLoopChildWatcher on Solaris
versions: Python 3.8, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37573>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37558] Shared memory tests are failing due to double slashes

2019-07-11 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +14502
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14703

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37558>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37558] Shared memory tests are failing due to double slashes

2019-07-11 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

Hi,

with the addition of shared memory into Python 3.8, we now have three tests 
failing on Solaris, namely `test_multiprocessing_fork`, 
`test_multiprocessing_forkserver` and `test_multiprocessing_spawn`. All of them 
fail in the same way:

==
ERROR: test_shared_memory_cleaned_after_process_termination 
(test.test_multiprocessing_fork.WithProcessesTestSharedMemory)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ".../Python-3.8.0b2/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 4013, in 
test_shared_memory_cleaned_after_process_termination
smm = shared_memory.SharedMemory(name, create=False)
  File ".../Python-3.8.0b2/Lib/multiprocessing/shared_memory.py", line 100, in 
__init__
self._fd = _posixshmem.shm_open(
OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: '//psm_5c1b5800'

The reason for this, in my opinion, is that the test suite is accessing private 
`sm._name` instead of the normalized `sm.name`. Returned value already has one 
slash prepended, and another one is prepended SharedMemory init is called, 
resulting in double slashes, which is incorrect.

Change to `sm.name` fixes this problem.

--
components: Tests
messages: 347662
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Shared memory tests are failing due to double slashes
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.8, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37558>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Improve encoding alias handling in locale coercion tests

2019-07-02 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
resolution:  -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Improve encoding alias handling in locale coercion tests

2019-06-28 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +14265
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14449

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Improve encoding alias handling in locale coercion tests

2019-06-28 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +14263
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14447

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Improve encoding alias handling in locale coercion tests

2019-06-28 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Python 3.8+ encodings are always normalized and thus no output variations 
handling is necessary (the code is no longer necessary).

Python 3.7 (and possibly lower) can have variations in encodings - that should 
be fixed with codecs.lookup functions.

--
title: Fix unexpected ASCII aliases in locale coercion tests. -> Improve 
encoding alias handling in locale coercion tests
versions: +Python 3.8, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Fix unexpected ASCII aliases in locale coercion tests.

2019-06-28 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +14259
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14443

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Fix unexpected ASCII aliases in locale coercion tests.

2019-06-28 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
title: Add 646 ASCII alias to locale coercion tests. -> Fix unexpected ASCII 
aliases in locale coercion tests.

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Add 646 ASCII alias to locale coercion tests.

2019-06-26 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I just added that in the way it was already there but I see why the current 
solution is not the best. Also I wanted to push this into 3.7 only as this 
problem is not present in 3.8 (as discussed in the PR 11195 opened incorrectly 
against the master).

Just to be sure: what you propose is to rewrite current replaces to use 
"codecs.lookup(encoding).name" instead and then push it into the master?
Ok, I will look into it.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Add 646 ASCII alias to locale coercion tests.

2019-06-21 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
pull_requests: +14107
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14285

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue35455] Solaris thread_time doesn't work with current implementation

2019-06-19 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

Since I created this pull request, clock_gettime(CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID, ..) 
was implemented into the Solaris kernel, so I guess that this is no longer 
relevant.

--
resolution:  -> not a bug
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35455>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Add 646 ASCII alias to locale coercion tests.

2019-06-19 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +14063
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/11195

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37335] Add 646 ASCII alias to locale coercion tests.

2019-06-19 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

Locale coercion tests on Solaris are failing because 646 ASCII alias is not 
recognized. Its addition into the _handle_output_variations function fixes this 
problem.

This was changed/fixed in Python 3.8 and later, where aliases are correctly 
translated to their canonical Python codec name so no patch is needed there.

--
components: Tests
messages: 346025
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Add 646 ASCII alias to locale coercion tests.
versions: Python 3.7

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37335>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37252] devpoll test failures on Solaris

2019-06-12 Thread Jakub Kulik


Change by Jakub Kulik :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +13882
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14017

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37252>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37252] devpoll test failures on Solaris

2019-06-12 Thread Jakub Kulik


New submission from Jakub Kulik :

test_devpoll currently ends with two failures with Python 3.8 on Solaris.

First one is wrong number of arguments to devpoll.register function (which 
thrown the same error as expected in 3.7 but now acts differently).

Second one is that register and modify no longer throw OverflowError when 
negative number is given as second argument, but rather a ValueError. I am not 
sure whether this is just a small semantics change or some bigger problem 
(documentation doesn't mention what error should be thrown).

So I fixed it in attached pull request by changing the expected thrown error 
but there might be other problem as well.

--
components: Extension Modules
messages: 345365
nosy: kulikjak
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: devpoll test failures on Solaris
versions: Python 3.8

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37252>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37232] Parallel compilation fails because of low ulimit.

2019-06-11 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

I am not sure what you are asking now. compileall with -j0 does compile on all 
cores simultaneously right?

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37232>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue37232] Parallel compilation fails because of low ulimit.

2019-06-11 Thread Jakub Kulik


Jakub Kulik  added the comment:

We have a limit of 256 opened files, which is not much, but I can up it and 
then it doesn't happen.

Mainly, I wanted to report that this might be happening now. But I guess not 
many people will face this problem.

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37232>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



  1   2   >