[issue45362] dis does not work with the new optimized ops
Martmists added the comment: > Specialized instructions are a hidden implementation detail, and instead the > normal generic instruction will appear. Will this change be reflected in co_code? If yes, then I'm aware of cases where this may be used by bytecode modification libraries. If not, how would it deal with co_code being modified? > Sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean here. The superinstructions do > not use different bytecode format: ie they take only one oparg. I see, so it'll just replace the first of the two ops to streamline the process rather than replacing the second one with a dummy instruction -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45362> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue45362] dis does not work with the new optimized ops
Martmists added the comment: Another thing I found to be quite odd is JUMP_ABSOLUTE_QUICK, which is set as 40, but as it's derived from JUMP_ABSOLUTE it still requires an argument. This makes HAVE_ARGUMENT useless as there's an op that doesn't follow the convention. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45362> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue45362] dis does not work with the new optimized ops
New submission from Martmists : Python 3.11.0a0 (heads/main:e6d1aa1, Oct 4 2021, 10:33:36) [GCC 11.1.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import dis >>> c = bytes([127, 1, 0, 2]) # LOAD_FAST__LOAD_FAST (1, 2) >>> dis.dis(c) 0 <127>1 2 <0> >>> c = bytes([48, 0, 161, 0]) # LOAD_GLOBAL_BUILTIN (0) CALL_FUNCTION (0) >>> dis.dis(c) 0 <48> 2 CALL_METHOD 0 --- The reason for this seems to be the lack of definition in `opcode.py` aside from being mentioned in _specialized_instructions. Additionally, it seems dis._unpack_opargs is not yet prepared to support opcodes like LOAD_FAST__LOAD_FAST which take two arguments. While I don't expect this to be a first priority in this big change, it's important to not forget it. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 403126 nosy: martmists priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: dis does not work with the new optimized ops type: behavior versions: Python 3.11 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue45362> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42085] Add dedicated slot for sending values
Change by Martmists : -- nosy: +martmists nosy_count: 4.0 -> 5.0 pull_requests: +25048 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25465 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42085> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
