[issue46060] Clarify asyncio.new_event_loop return value
Change by Paul Bryan : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46060> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46060] Clarify asyncio.new_event_loop return value
Change by Paul Bryan : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +pbryan nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 pull_requests: +28299 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30078 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46060> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue46060] Clarify asyncio.new_event_loop return value
New submission from Paul Bryan : Currently, the documentation states it creates a new event loop; it should also indicate that it returns the newly created event loop. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 408425 nosy: docs@python, pbryan2 priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Clarify asyncio.new_event_loop return value versions: Python 3.10, Python 3.11 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue46060> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43345] Add __required_keys__ and __optional_keys__ to TypedDict documentation
Change by Paul Bryan : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43345> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43345] Add __required_keys__ and __optional_keys__ to TypedDict documentation
Change by Paul Bryan : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +23453 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24668 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43345> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43345] Add __required_keys__ and __optional_keys__ to TypedDict documentation
Change by Paul Bryan : -- nosy: +gvanrossum ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43345> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue43345] Add __required_keys__ and __optional_keys__ to TypedDict documentation
New submission from Paul Bryan : >From Typing-sig list: On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:54 PM Paul Bryan wrote: > I don't think __required_keys__ or __optional_keys__ are documented, at least > not in https://docs.python.org/3.10/library/typing.html. Is there any reason > we can't codify them in 3.10 docs? On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 14:23 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Nobody got to it yet? Maybe you'd be willing to submit a small PR for this? -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 387802 nosy: docs@python, pbryan priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Add __required_keys__ and __optional_keys__ to TypedDict documentation versions: Python 3.10 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43345> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42269] Add ability to set __slots__ in dataclasses
Change by Paul Bryan : -- nosy: +pbryan ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42269> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue33129] Add kwarg-only option to dataclass
Change by Paul Bryan : -- nosy: +pbryan ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33129> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42904] get_type_hints does not provide localns for classes
Change by Paul Bryan : -- nosy: +larry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42904> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42904] get_type_hints does not provide localns for classes
New submission from Paul Bryan : According to PEP 563: > The get_type_hints() function automatically resolves the correct value of > globalns for functions and classes. It also automatically provides the > correct localns for classes. This statement about providing correct localns for classes does not appear to be true. Guido suggested this should be treated as a bug. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 384885 nosy: gvanrossum, pbryan priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: get_type_hints does not provide localns for classes type: behavior versions: Python 3.10 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42904> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42662] Propose: Data model explict about __annotations__ key ordering.
Paul Bryan added the comment: Retracting. -- resolution: -> not a bug stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42662> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42662] Propose: Data model explict about __annotations__ key ordering.
Change by Paul Bryan : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +22668 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23808 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42662> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42662] Propose: Data model explict about __annotations__ key ordering.
New submission from Paul Bryan : Currently the data model documentation does not specify the order of keys in __annotations__ dictionary. It is currently in the order that arguments or attributes are declared. I propose to make this explicit. Rationale: Having order explicitly specified in the documentation makes it a documented feature that code can depend on. Current code cannot safely rely on this behavior. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 383204 nosy: docs@python, pbryan priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Propose: Data model explict about __annotations__ key ordering. versions: Python 3.10 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42662> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42592] TypedDict: total=False but still key required
Paul Bryan added the comment: Your patch LGTM, Brandt. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42592> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue42592] TypedDict: total=False but still key required
New submission from Paul Bryan :
I believe "a" below should be an optional key, not a required one.
Python 3.9.0 (default, Oct 7 2020, 23:09:01)
[GCC 10.2.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import typing
>>> TD = typing.TypedDict("TD", {"a": str}, total=False)
>>> TD.__total__
False
>>> TD.__required_keys__
frozenset({'a'})
>>> TD.__optional_keys__
frozenset()
>>>
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 382662
nosy: gvanrossum, pbryan
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: TypedDict: total=False but still key required
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42592>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15873] datetime: add ability to parse RFC 3339 dates and times
Changes by Paul Bryan pbr...@anode.ca: -- nosy: +pbryan ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15873 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
