[issue1722225] Build on QNX 6
Vladimir Konjkov added the comment: For _XOPEN_SOURCE and _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED look this http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908775/xcurses/implement.html _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue175 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1722225] Build on QNX 6
Vladimir Konjkov added the comment: there is script Misk/find_recursionlimit.py that can help to find real recursion limit for QNX4 for one recursion used ~900 kb of stack thus 1Mb sufficient for default recursion limit = 1000. _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue175 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1722225] Build on QNX
Vladimir Konjkov added the comment: willing you implement thread support for qnx6, or may be qnx4? _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue175 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1722225] Build on QNX
Vladimir Konjkov added the comment: However, I don't understand this entire point: What do you mean by using TCGETA requires that struct termio be defined? How is TCGETA defined to produce such a dependency? TCGETA is a constant, right? --- terminal I/O control has three different implementations under SVR4, BSD, and POSIX.1. SVR4 uses the termio structure, and various ioctl calls (such as TCGETA, TCSETA, TCSETAW, and TCSETAF) on a terminal device to obtain and set parameters with the termio structure. Under POSIX, the termios struct is used, along with various functions defined by POSIX.1, such as tcsetattr and tcgetattr. Under QNX termios.h - is POSIX implimentation with functions tcsetattr and tcgetattr defined, but in ioctl.h that included in termio.h define MACROS TCGETA, TCSETA, TCSETAW, and TCSETAF. That's why we need termio.h or simlink sys/termio.h. Why do you want TCGETA, TCSETA, TCSETAW, and TCSETAF in Python if there is POSIX tcsetattr and tcgetattr functions? _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue175 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1722225] Build on QNX
Vladimir Konjkov added the comment: addition TCGETA is a constant. That's right! under QNX4 TCGETA defined as MACRO in sys/ioctl.h. That's right! in Modules/termios.c there's #include sys/ioctl.h That's right too! What's problem after all? Problem is that MACRO definition of TCGETA need sizeof(struct termio), that's (struct termio) defined in sys/termio.h. But sys/termio.h not included in sys/ioctl.h instead of it sys/ioctl.h included in sys/termio.h and we need, if we want to have TCGETA, start with sys/termio.h that's included both sys/ioctl.h and termios.h too and do it right way! It's clearly now? _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue175 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1722225] Build on QNX
Vladimir Konjkov added the comment: look this http://www.mail-archive.com/python-bugs-list%40python.org/msg07749.html it's for python-2.3.5 under qnx4.25. about pyport.h under qnx4.25: I include unix.h instead of definition of function openpty()+forkpty() in pyport.h, openpty()+forkpty() naturaly defined in unix.h but configure doesn't knows. -- nosy: +Konjkov _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue175 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
