[issue10507] Check well-formedness of reST markup within "make patchcheck"

[Mariatta Wijaya]

Mariatta Wijaya  added the comment:

This is out of date. I'm closing it.

Thanks.

--
nosy: +Mariatta
resolution:  -> out of date
stage: needs patch -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue10507] Check well-formedness of reST markup within "make patchcheck"

[Cheryl Sabella]

Cheryl Sabella  added the comment:

Since `blurb` says to write a simple ReST paragraph and that is code reviewed 
with the PR, is this issue still needed?

--
nosy: +csabella

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue10507] Check well-formedness of reST markup within make patchcheck

[Éric Araujo]

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:

Alternatively, make patchcheck could print “Did you build the docs?”, just as 
it currently prints “Did you run the test suite?” if C or Python files were 
modified.  Building the docs would not check Misc/NEWS, the original motivation 
for this request, but I’m not sure it’s a big issue.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10507
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue10507] Check well-formedness of reST markup within make patchcheck

[Ezio Melotti]

Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
versions:  -Python 3.1

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10507
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue10507] Check well-formedness of reST markup within make patchcheck

[Georg Brandl]

Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:

rst2html doesn't help, since it doesn't recognize Sphinx' and Python's own 
markup extensions.

--
nosy: +georg.brandl

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10507
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue10507] Check well-formedness of reST markup within make patchcheck

[Éric Araujo]

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:

Have a look at Doc/tools/rstlint.py

--
nosy: +eric.araujo

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10507
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue10507] Check well-formedness of reST markup within make patchcheck

[Dave Malcolm]

New submission from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com:

Misc/NEWS needs to be valid reST.

Issue 10450 identified an issue where it wasn't.

make patchcheck potentially could check the markup of that file, and, 
potentially all the other places in the source tree that are supposed to be 
valid reST (all of the .rst files in the source tree, especially those below 
Doc).

I don't know what the best way of doing this is, without pulling in a lot of 
dependencies.  (Perhaps we could look for rst2html on $PATH, and use it if it's 
present?).

--
components: Demos and Tools
messages: 122142
nosy: dmalcolm
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: needs patch
status: open
title: Check well-formedness of reST markup within make patchcheck
type: feature request
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10507
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com