[issue1056293] dir() should only return strings
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment: It's a feature request and it looks like except of Skip Montanaro in 2004, nobody requires this feature. I don't like my patch because it slows down Python just for a very rare case (this issue). I choose to close it. Reopen this issue if you think that this feature (check type of dir() result) is a must have ;-) -- resolution: - wont fix status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1056293 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1056293] dir() should only return strings
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment: Yes, the issue still exists in 2009. Attached patch contains a test + a patch to test the type of each value of the dir() result. I'm not sure that it's a good idea to apply my patch. It's maybe not the job of Python to check the types of dir() result. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +haypo Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13109/dir_type.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1056293 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1056293] dir() should only return strings
Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com added the comment: Still present in trunk:69418: class obj: pass obj.__dict__[1] = 0 [k for k in dir(obj) if k.startswith(set_)] -- nosy: +ajaksu2 type: - behavior versions: +Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1056293 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
