[issue10625] There is no test for repr(complex(-0., 1.)) special handling
New submission from Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com: There's a special test in the C code for this, but there no test for it in test_complex. Note that this needs to be a IEEE 754 specific test. -- assignee: eric.smith components: Tests keywords: easy messages: 123348 nosy: eric.smith priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: There is no test for repr(complex(-0.,1.)) special handling versions: Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10625 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10625] There is no test for repr(complex(-0., 1.)) special handling
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10625 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10625] There is no test for repr(complex(-0., 1.)) special handling
Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com added the comment: Technically the special handling in complex_repr() is for +0, but there needs to be a test both ways. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10625 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10625] There is no test for repr(complex(-0., 1.)) special handling
Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com added the comment: Checked-in in r87044. -- resolution: - accepted stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10625 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
