[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2015-05-14 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray added the comment:

Given that several comments say this should be done, and your analysis 
indicates it is done, I think it should be safe to close it :)

Thanks for the nudge.

--
nosy: +r.david.murray
resolution:  - fixed
stage: test needed - resolved
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2015-05-14 Thread Francis MB

Francis MB added the comment:

Can this issue be closed?
IMHO it's not clear what still needs to be done. The patch seems to be there 
already.

Thanks in advance!

--
nosy: +francismb

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2014-07-02 Thread Mark Lawrence

Mark Lawrence added the comment:

Presumably the changes made in the default branch referred to in msg179037 will 
have automatically been carried forward to 3.4 and 3.5.

--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2013-01-04 Thread Serhiy Storchaka

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:


--
components: +Tests -Library (Lib)

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2013-01-04 Thread Ronald Oussoren

Ronald Oussoren added the comment:

There are tests for samefile and sameopenfile in test_genericpath.GenericTest 
which is included by test_ntpath (NtCommonTest subclasses 
test_genericpath.CommonTest which again subclasses GenericTest).

I cannot easily test on Windows (the only windows systems I've easy access to 
are production boxes using py2.7), but if my analysis is correct this issue can 
be closed

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2013-01-04 Thread Brian Curtin

Brian Curtin added the comment:

That's true of the default branch due to some changes I recently made in the 
implementation of the functions, but we should probably put tests into 3.2/3.3.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2011-05-16 Thread Sijin Joseph

Changes by Sijin Joseph sijinjos...@gmail.com:


--
nosy:  -sijinjoseph

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2011-05-12 Thread Santoso Wijaya

Santoso Wijaya santoso.wij...@gmail.com added the comment:

Attaching a patch to test a use case for ntpath.samefile (looks like 
sameopenfile is already tested--or at least a use case of it).

--
components: +Library (Lib)
keywords: +patch
nosy: +santa4nt
versions:  -Python 3.4
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21985/test_samefile.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2011-05-11 Thread Sijin Joseph

Changes by Sijin Joseph sijinjos...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +sijinjoseph

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2011-05-06 Thread Ronald Oussoren

New submission from Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com:

Python 3.2 introduced ntpath.samefile, but the implementation is not tested in 
test_ntpath.py. The same seems true of ntpath.sameopenfile.

As noted in #10684 ntpath.samefile is broken on XP, which would have been 
caught by unittest. I've committed a fix for that particular bug, but haven't 
added unittests.

--
components: Windows
keywords: easy
messages: 135307
nosy: ronaldoussoren
priority: low
severity: normal
stage: test needed
status: open
title: No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue12018] No tests for ntpath.samefile, ntpath.sameopenfile

2011-05-06 Thread Brian Curtin

Changes by Brian Curtin br...@python.org:


--
nosy: +brian.curtin

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue12018
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com