[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments
Changes by Yury Selivanov yselivanov...@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12971 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments
Марк Коренберг socketp...@gmail.com added the comment: Отправлено с iPad 27.06.2012, в 6:03, Larry Hastings rep...@bugs.python.org написал(а): No, follow symlinks is not the same. Skiplinks mean returning true or false depending on fact that last path element is symlink. Checking If symlink appear in the middle of the path, this is not issue of this feature request. -- nosy: +larry ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12971 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12971 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org added the comment: First: there's no chance this will go into 3.1, 3.2, or 3.3 at this point. Second: I can assure you that switching to the l... version of a function and not following the last symlink is exactly what follow_symlinks is for. Please see the 3.3 documentation on follow_symlinks for more: http://docs.python.org/3.3/library/os.html#follow-symlinks Third: I think it's better to keep os.isdir() simple. Users who want more sophisticated use cases (what to do about symlinks, using a dir_fd parameter) should use os.stat(). So I'm -1 on this. TBH I'm not sure this even warrants a documentation change (for more functionality, use os.stat()). -- versions: -Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12971 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12971 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org added the comment: If this happens, in keeping with the new os module aesthetic, I suggest the prototype should be os.isdir(path, *, follow_symlinks=True) -- nosy: +larry ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12971 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments
Changes by Alexey Smirnov alexey.smir...@gmx.com: -- nosy: +alexey-smirnov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12971 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments
New submission from Марк Коренберг socketp...@gmail.com: When skiplinks is False (by default), it should as in current implementation, i.e. using stat(). if skiplinks is True, isidr() should use lstat() and same logick. If one will be implemented, os.walk() should be patched (see issue12970) to use this new isdir() with this new parameter instead of own logick in os.walk(). -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 143968 nosy: mmarkk priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments type: feature request versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12971 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
