[issue17697] Incorrect stacktrace from pdb

2015-05-07 Thread Aaron Meurer 

Changes by Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +Aaron.Meurer

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17697
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17697] Incorrect stacktrace from pdb

2013-04-12 Thread Xavier de Gaye 

Xavier de Gaye added the comment:

The call to set_trace() installs a local trace function on all the
frames of the stack, including on the oldest frame, i.e. the module
level frame. This causes the invocation of frame_settrace() in
frameobject.c and the  module frame f_lineno is evaluated by
PyCode_Addr2Line() (this happens only on the first call to set_trace()
since the module frame local trace is never removed).

Next, the 'continue' command sets the global trace function to None
and removes the local trace function of all the frames of the stack,
*except* the module frame (see set_continue() in bdb.py).

On printing the stack with the 'where' command, the bdb get_stack()
function invokes frame_getlineno() that calls PyFrame_GetLineNumber()
that assumes that the module frame f_lineno is correct since it has a
local trace function.  But as the global trace function has been set
to None by the 'continue' command, f_lineno is not updated by
the interpreter tracing code when running the module level frame.
Hence the problem.

The root cause is that PyFrame_GetLineNumber assumes incorrectly that
when a frame has a local trace function, its f_lineno is correct.

Issue 7238 and issue 17277 are also related to this issue.

--
nosy: +xdegaye

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17697
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17697] Incorrect stacktrace from pdb

2013-04-11 Thread Don Allen 

New submission from Don Allen:

Give the attached file execute permission and run it. At the first breakpoint, 
the backtrace will be correct. Continue. At the second breakpoint, a backtrace 
will show the foo('first call') on the stack when, in fact, the call came from 
foo('second call'), as verified by the printed message.

I am running this on an up-to-date 64-bit Arch Linux system. Python 3.3.1.

--
components: Library (Lib)
files: python_bug.py
messages: 186561
nosy: donaldcallen
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Incorrect stacktrace from pdb
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.3
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29777/python_bug.py

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17697
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17697] Incorrect stacktrace from pdb

2013-04-11 Thread Ian Kelly 

Ian Kelly added the comment:

The bug also occurs using 32-bit Python 3.3.1 on Windows 7.

--
nosy: +ikelly

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17697
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17697] Incorrect stacktrace from pdb

2013-04-11 Thread Ned Deily 

Ned Deily added the comment:

On python-list, Robert Kern used where to demonstrate the problem: 

$ python pdbbug.py
first call
--Return--
  /Users/rkern/scratch/pdbbug.py(4)foo()-None
- pdb.set_trace()
(Pdb) where
   /Users/rkern/scratch/pdbbug.py(5)module()
- foo('first call')
  /Users/rkern/scratch/pdbbug.py(4)foo()-None
- pdb.set_trace()
(Pdb) c
second call
--Return--
  /Users/rkern/scratch/pdbbug.py(4)foo()-None
- pdb.set_trace()
(Pdb) where
   /Users/rkern/scratch/pdbbug.py(5)module()
- foo('first call')
  /Users/rkern/scratch/pdbbug.py(4)foo()-None
- pdb.set_trace()
(Pdb)

Searching other open pdb issues, applying the suggested fix from Issue16482 
seems to correct the problem here.

--
nosy: +ned.deily

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17697
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17697] Incorrect stacktrace from pdb

2013-04-11 Thread Ned Deily 

Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:


--
stage:  - needs patch
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.4

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17697
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com