[issue17904] bytes should be listed as built-in function for 2.7

2020-04-26 Thread Zachary Ware 


Zachary Ware  added the comment:

As 2.7 has now reached EOL, I'm closing the issue.

--
nosy: +zach.ware
resolution:  -> out of date
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17904] bytes should be listed as built-in function for 2.7

2014-07-01 Thread Andy Maier 

Andy Maier added the comment:

Ezio, what do you mean with string signature?

For me, the patch looks fine as it is.

--
nosy: +andymaier

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17904
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17904] bytes should be listed as built-in function for 2.7

2014-07-01 Thread Ezio Melotti 

Ezio Melotti added the comment:

I mean here: https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html#str

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17904
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17904] bytes should be listed as built-in function for 2.7

2014-07-01 Thread Andy Maier 

Andy Maier added the comment:

Your patch right now generates the line:

  New in version 2.6: bytes() has been added as an alias for str()

at the end of the paragraph for str().

To me, that is sufficient for the description of str().

If anything, we could add a separate paragraph for bytes(), after the paragraph 
for bytearray(), e.g. like this:

--

.. function:: bytes()

   Alias for :func:`str`.

   .. versionadded:: 2.6

--

If that is what you had in mind, I think it is a good idea to add it.

Andy

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17904
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17904] bytes should be listed as built-in function for 2.7

2013-05-10 Thread Ezio Melotti 

Ezio Melotti added the comment:

Here's a patch.  Do you think it should be added under the string signature 
too?  It will make linking easier, but it might be more confusing for users.

--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +chris.jerdonek, ezio.melotti
stage: needs patch - patch review
type: behavior - enhancement
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30201/issue17904.diff

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17904
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17904] bytes should be listed as built-in function for 2.7

2013-05-04 Thread Florent Xicluna 

New submission from Florent Xicluna:

Looking into the summary table, there's no information about the `bytes` 
built-in alias for `str`:
http://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html

IMHO it should appear in this table (as str, unicode, bytearray) with the 
appropriate `.. versionadded:`.

--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 188349
nosy: docs@python, flox
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: bytes should be listed as built-in function for 2.7
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17904
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue17904] bytes should be listed as built-in function for 2.7

2013-05-04 Thread Antoine Pitrou 

Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:


--
stage:  - needs patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17904
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com