[issue19175] Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar

2019-05-17 Thread Cheryl Sabella


Change by Cheryl Sabella :


--
resolution:  -> duplicate
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed
superseder:  -> Format mini-language integer definition is incorrect

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19175] Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar

2013-10-05 Thread Georg Brandl

Georg Brandl added the comment:

The bug is that "integer" links to the "integer" production in the Python 
grammar.  This shouldn't happen; I'll have a look on the Sphinx side.

As a workaround, "integer" can be replaced by "digit+" as requested (it occurs 
twice).

--
nosy: +georg.brandl

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19175] Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar

2013-10-05 Thread Georg Brandl

Changes by Georg Brandl :


--
assignee: docs@python -> eric.smith
nosy: +eric.smith

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19175] Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar

2013-10-05 Thread David Chambers

New submission from David Chambers:

I first raised this issue on Stack Overflow: 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19203194

The [replacement field grammar][1] states that an [integer][2] is a valid 
field_name, but this is inaccurate:

>>> '{0}'.format('zero')
'zero'
>>> '{0x0}.format('zero')
KeyError: '0x0'
>>> '{0o0}.format('zero')
KeyError: '0o0'
>>> '{0b0}.format('zero')
KeyError: '0b0'

This [comment][3] by Eric Smith suggests that the above is the intended 
behaviour:

> get_integer uses the narrowest possible definition for integer indexes,
> in order to pass all other strings to mappings.

The documentation should be updated to match the actual behaviour. abarnert on 
Stack Overflow suggested the following change:

-arg_name  ::=  [identifier | integer]
+arg_name  ::=  [identifier | digit+]


[1]: http://docs.python.org/2/library/string.html#format-string-syntax
[2]: 
http://docs.python.org/2/reference/lexical_analysis.html#grammar-token-integer
[3]: http://bugs.python.org/issue8985#msg107705

--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 199024
nosy: davidchambers, docs@python
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Erroneous reference to "integer" in format string grammar
versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com