[issue20071] What should happen if someone runs ./python -m ensurepip in the build environment?
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org: -- nosy: +dstufft, ncoghlan, ned.deily versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20071 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20071] What should happen if someone runs ./python -m ensurepip in the build environment?
Nick Coghlan added the comment: The whole sys.path initialisation scheme is pretty broken when running from a source checkout, so the short answer is it won't work, and it isn't really fixable in a maintenance release. System Python 3: sys.path = [ '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k', '/usr/lib64/python33.zip', '/usr/lib64/python3.3', '/usr/lib64/python3.3/plat-linux', '/usr/lib64/python3.3/lib-dynload', '/home/ncoghlan/.local/lib/python3.3/site-packages', '/usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages', '/usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages', ] My source checkout: sys.path = [ '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k', '/usr/local/lib/python35.zip', '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k/Lib', '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k/Lib/plat-linux', '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k/build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.5', '/home/ncoghlan/devel/py3k/Modules', '/home/ncoghlan/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages', ] We should probably have an explicit check for that in ensurepip so it bails out as an unsupported operation rather than doing something weird. Looking in sys.path for os.path.join(os.path.dirname(sys.executable), 'Lib') should be a fairly reliable indicator that we're running from a source checkout. Actually *fixing* it to do something sensible would require a lot of work on the sys.path initialisation code, and I frankly consider that impractical given the current state of getpath.c. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20071 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20071] What should happen if someone runs ./python -m ensurepip in the build environment?
Nick Coghlan added the comment: Note that if I find time to implement the startup sequence redesign for PEP 432/issue #22257 (which is finally starting to look like it may actually happen some time in the next few months), a proper fix may end up being possible for 3.5. We shouldn't bet on that, though, and the explicit failure is definitely the best we'll be able to do for 3.4 and the 2.7 backport. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20071 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20071] What should happen if someone runs ./python -m ensurepip in the build environment?
New submission from R. David Murray: Someone on IRC reported doing this, and it (logically enough) gave a permission error trying to install into /opt. That may be exactly what it should do...but if he'd done it as root, presumably it would have tried to install PIP without python having been installed first, which might be wrong. (Donald says it would indeed install it, creating the directories as needed.) -- messages: 206948 nosy: r.david.murray priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: What should happen if someone runs ./python -m ensurepip in the build environment? ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20071 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
