[issue2147] int operations no longer overflow

[Georg Brandl]

Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:

OK, I think I fixed the remaining locations in r63055.

--
resolution:  -> fixed
status: open -> closed

__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue2147] int operations no longer overflow

[Will Robinson]

Will Robinson added the comment:

Just jumping in to say the colleague Neal refers to is me, and I'm
interested in the resolution to this bug.  Thanks in advance for your help.

--
nosy: +willrobinson

__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue2147] int operations no longer overflow

[Neal Norwitz]

New submission from Neal Norwitz:

Georg, I hope you don't mind me assigning this to you.  Feel free to
unassign.  A colleague pointed me to section 5.7 in the old ref doc:

http://docs.python.org/ref/shifting.html

It says that shifting operations lose data on overflow.  This info is
outdated based on PEP 237.  I suspect there may be other inaccuracies
related to int overflow.  So the purpose of this bug is to point out the
specific problem as well as to log that we need to find all invalid
references to overflow.

--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
messages: 62586
nosy: georg.brandl, nnorwitz
severity: normal
status: open
title: int operations no longer overflow
versions: Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0

__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com