[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

[Serhiy Storchaka]

Serhiy Storchaka  added the comment:

Python 2.7 is no longer supported.

--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
resolution:  -> out of date
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

[Mariatta Wijaya]

Mariatta Wijaya  added the comment:

Documentation fixes to 2.7 is still accepted. Please create a PR on GitHub.

--
nosy: +Mariatta

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

[ndevenish]

ndevenish  added the comment:

I've just spent some time running around because of this. Are documentation 
contributions still being accepted for python 2.7 at all? Some of the buffer 
documentation seems to be confusing as to whether you use new or old API.

--
nosy: +ndevenish

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

[Giacomo Alzetta]

Changes by Giacomo Alzetta giacomo.alze...@gmail.com:


--
assignee:  - docs@python
components: +Documentation
nosy: +docs@python
type:  - enhancement
versions: +Python 2.7

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23850
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

[Giacomo Alzetta]

New submission from Giacomo Alzetta:

Python2.7 documentation is missing critical information regarding the 
backporting of the new-buffer protocol.
There is no mention whatsoever of the Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER flag which is 
required to implement it. The only way to discover it is by reading the sources 
of the built-ins or stdlib.

--
messages: 239895
nosy: Giacomo.Alzetta
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23850
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com