STINNER Victor added the comment: To be clear: the bug doesn't occur when Python is not installed "in parallel" (without MAKEFLAGS=-j9).
"For consistency with other things, I would suggest to add the following at the beginning of bininstall target (instead of making bininstall target depend on libainstall target):" Ok. Does my new patch look better? Should I apply my fix to Python 2.7, 3.4, 3.5 and default (3.6)? ---------- title: "make install" fails because bininstall target requires the libainstall target -> "MAKEFLAGS=-j9 make install" fails because bininstall target requires the libainstall target Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file41162/bininstall-2.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25696> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
