[issue26515] Update extending/embedding docs to new way to build modules in C

[Petr Viktorin]

Petr Viktorin  added the comment:

PEP 630 is now Active. I believe the vast majority of modules can now be 
ported, and it should be helpful for early adopters (including CPython stdlib). 
But there are still Open Issues and the API not battle-tested on all the edge 
cases.

The PEP is written to be easily integrated into official docs when the time 
comes.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue26515] Update extending/embedding docs to new way to build modules in C

[Petr Viktorin]

Petr Viktorin  added the comment:

There is now PEP 630. Still not done enough to move it out of draft status, but 
usable for converting simple modules.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue26515] Update extending/embedding docs to new way to build modules in C

[Nick Coghlan]

Nick Coghlan  added the comment:

Changed target version as per Petr's comment (PEP 573 is close to being 
accepted for 3.9 - it just needs some editing to improve clarity in the PEP 
itself, rather than needing any changes to the technical proposal)

--
versions: +Python 3.9 -Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue26515] Update extending/embedding docs to new way to build modules in C

[Petr Viktorin]

Petr Viktorin  added the comment:

Correct usage of multi-phase init might now get users stuck when they start 
needing per-module state. See PEP 573 "Module State Access from C Extension 
Methods" for the (hopefully) last thing that prevents me from generally 
recommending multi-phase init.

That PEP is on my list for after PRP 590 is done.
Before it's implemented, I'm happy leaving PyModuleDef_Init to experts -- that 
is, have it in the reference docs only.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue26515] Update extending/embedding docs to new way to build modules in C

[STINNER Victor]

Change by STINNER Victor :


--
nosy: +petr.viktorin

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue26515] Update extending/embedding docs to new way to build modules in C

[Berker Peksag]

Change by Berker Peksag :


--
nosy: +berker.peksag
type:  -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8 -Python 3.5

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue26515] Update extending/embedding docs to new way to build modules in C

[Berker Peksag]

Change by Berker Peksag :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +8177
stage: needs patch -> patch review

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue26515] Update extending/embedding docs to new way to build modules in C

[Brett Cannon]

New submission from Brett Cannon:

https://docs.python.org/3/extending/extending.html#a-simple-example uses 
PyModule_Create() instead of PyModuleDef_Init().

--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 261398
nosy: brett.cannon, docs@python, eric.snow, ncoghlan
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: needs patch
status: open
title: Update extending/embedding docs to new way to build modules in C
versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com