[issue38859] AsyncMock says it raises StopIteration but that is Impossible

[Lisa Roach]

Lisa Roach  added the comment:

PR merged, thanks Jason!

--
resolution:  -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue38859] AsyncMock says it raises StopIteration but that is Impossible

[Karthikeyan Singaravelan]

Change by Karthikeyan Singaravelan :


--
nosy: +xtreak

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue38859] AsyncMock says it raises StopIteration but that is Impossible

[Jason Fried]

Change by Jason Fried :


--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +16762
stage:  -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17269

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue38859] AsyncMock says it raises StopIteration but that is Impossible

[Jason Fried]

New submission from Jason Fried :

If an AsyncMock uses a side_effect that is an Iterable, if called more than 
items exist its suppose to raise StopIteration according to the docs but PEP 
479 says that is impossible. 

My Suggestion is that we update the docs and the code to Raise a 
StopAsyncIteration since it will not be converted to a RuntimeError

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 357008
nosy: fried, lisroach
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: AsyncMock says it raises StopIteration but that is Impossible
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.8, Python 3.9

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com