[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2013-02-25 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt

Ulrich Eckhardt added the comment:

There is at least one thing that is missing in the patch, it lacks the 
necessary tests. The partialbug.py demonstrates the issue, it could be used as 
a base. However, even then, there is still one thing that is problematic: The 
fact that partial() returns something that behaves like a static method is 
documented and changing that is not backward compatible.

I still think that something like this should become part of Python though. 
Jack Diederich argues that you can use lambda to achieve the same, but that is 
not always true. If you want to bind an argument to the current value of a 
variable instead of a constant, lambda fails. You need the closure created by a 
function call to bind those variables inside a local function. Having a 
dedicated function for that is IMHO preferable to people copying the 
Python-only equivalent of partial() to achieve the same effect or even 
inventing their own.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2013-02-25 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray added the comment:

See also issue 11470.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2013-02-08 Thread Ramchandra Apte

Changes by Ramchandra Apte maniandra...@gmail.com:


--
versions: +Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 3.0

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2013-02-07 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt

Ulrich Eckhardt added the comment:

Just for the record, the behaviour is documented, unfortunately in the very 
last line of the functools documentation: Also, partial objects defined in 
classes behave like static methods and do not transform into bound methods 
during instance attribute look-up.

Concerning how exactly they should behave during that lookup, I'd use the least 
surprising variant, namely that they are not treated differently from other 
functions: The first parameter is implicitly self.

--
nosy: +eckhardt

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2013-02-07 Thread Matt Joiner

Matt Joiner added the comment:

What's preventing this from being committed and closed?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2012-03-24 Thread Matt Joiner

Changes by Matt Joiner anacro...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +anacrolix

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2012-03-24 Thread Matt Joiner

Matt Joiner anacro...@gmail.com added the comment:

I've attached a patch that implements the descriptor protocol for 
functools.partial with minimum changes.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25016/functools.partial-descrget.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2011-12-10 Thread Jesús Cea Avión

Changes by Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es:


--
nosy: +jcea

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2010-02-23 Thread Jack Diederich

Jack Diederich jackd...@gmail.com added the comment:

We talked about it at sprints and the semantics are ambiguous and there are 
alternatives.

Ambiguous:
  def show_funcs(*args): print(args)
  class A():
run = partial(1)
  ob = A()
  ob.run(2,3)
Should this print (self, 1, 2, 3) or (1, self, 2, 3)?  And what about
  partial(ob.run, 2)(3)

Alternatives: partial is a convenience function not an optimization (it doesn't 
offer a speedup.  So you can write a lambda or named function that has the 
exact semantics you want without suffering a speed penalty.

So unless there are a lot of good use cases with obvious behavior, we should 
refuse the temptation to guess and leave partial as-is.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2010-02-23 Thread Jack Diederich

Jack Diederich jackd...@gmail.com added the comment:

correction:
  run = partial(1)
should have been
  run = partial(show_funcs, 1)

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2010-02-22 Thread Jack Diederich

Jack Diederich jackd...@gmail.com added the comment:

I'm having some trouble wrapping my head around this one.  It isn't obvious to 
me that
my_method(*args):
  print(args)
class A():
  meth = partial(my_method, 'argA')
ob = A()
ob.meth('argB')

should print (A object at 0x1234, 'argA', 'argB') and not
('argA', A object at 0x1234, 'argB')

The patch seems to prefer the first form but if you are using a partial 
shouldn't you expect 'argA' to always be the first argument to the partial-ized 
function?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2010-02-22 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:

I would expect the second and would view the first as a bug.

--
nosy: +r.david.murray

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2010-02-01 Thread Alexander Belopolsky

Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopol...@gmail.com added the comment:

Please see issue7830 for a related patch.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2010-01-28 Thread Alexander Belopolsky

Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopol...@gmail.com added the comment:

Christophe,

It looks like your patch goes out of its way to avoid creating nested partials. 
 This is a worthwhile goal and I think it should be done in partial_new so that 
partial(partial(f, x), y) returns partial(f, x, y).

If fact, I was surprised to learn that current partial implementation does not 
behave this way:

 partial(partial(f, 1), 2).func
functools.partial object at 0x100435af8

Does anyone know the reason for the current behavior?  It is possible that I am 
missing some subtlety related to keyword arguments.

--
nosy: +Alexander.Belopolsky

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2010-01-09 Thread Christophe Simonis

Christophe Simonis simonis.christo...@gmail.com added the comment:

I followed the advice of Raymond and implement a descriptor on partial.

--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15800/issue4331.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2009-03-05 Thread Christophe Simonis

Changes by Christophe Simonis simonis.christo...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +Christophe Simonis

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2008-12-02 Thread Alexander Belopolsky

Changes by Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


--
nosy: +belopolsky

___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2008-11-16 Thread scott sadler

scott sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:

A short update, I believe that the reason that it was working in one
instance was because of some abstractions by a base class (Django model,
get_absolute_url).

___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2008-11-16 Thread Calvin Spealman

Calvin Spealman [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:

I don't think this is any kind of bug, it is simply a product of only 
function objects being decorated automatically as methods. Your python 
version works because it is, in fact, a function. _functools.partial 
objects are not functions, but simply callable objects.

--
nosy: +ironfroggy

___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2008-11-16 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:

Reclassifying as a feature request.
A descriptor could be added to partial()
so that it too would have automatic
method binding just like pure python functions.

--
nosy: +rhettinger
type: behavior - feature request
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.0 -Python 2.5, Python 2.6

___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue4331] Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method

2008-11-15 Thread scott sadler

New submission from scott sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Calling a function created by _functools.partial as a method raises an
exception:

TypeError: method_new() takes exactly n non-keyword arguments (0 given)

Where method_new is the function passed into partial() and n is the
number of arguments it expects.

This does not happen when using a python version of partial().

Strangely, in the circumstance that I originally encountered the bug,
there was one instance that I was doing this and it _DID WORK_. The
function being passed into partial() was the same as in the place where
it was failing. The only significant difference that I could see was
that the input function to partial() was being imported, rather than
being defined in the same namespace as it was used I was unable to
reproduce it in my test case (attatched).

Tested on 2.6 and 2.5.2

--
components: Extension Modules
files: partialbug.py
messages: 75928
nosy: ssadler
severity: normal
status: open
title: Can't use _functools.partial() created function as method
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.5, Python 2.6
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12017/partialbug.py

___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue4331
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com