[issue4914] trunc(x) erroneously documented as built-in

[Georg Brandl]

Georg Brandl  added the comment:

Thanks, fixed in r68721.

--
resolution:  -> fixed
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue4914] trunc(x) erroneously documented as built-in

[Terry J. Reedy]

Terry J. Reedy  added the comment:

Confirmed for 3.0 that trunc does not exist in the builtins module and
is not listed in the Built-in functions section but is listed in the
Numeric Types section.  So I agree "trunc(x) x truncated to Integral "
should leave the Operation table.

Yes, MM, we do want to clean up such discrepancies.

trunc is in the math module and is listed in its doc.

--
nosy: +tjreedy

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue4914] trunc(x) erroneously documented as built-in

[Mitchell Model]

New submission from Mitchell Model :

In the Numeric Types documentation for 2.6, 3.0, and 3.1 trunc is 
documented as a built-in, like round, but while there is a trunc in math 
there is no built-in trunc. Read some of the debate on trunc from a year 
ago convinced me that this discrepancy is a documentation problem not a 
problem with the built-in functions.  Sorry if I'm completely off target 
here, but since I noticed I figured it was worth an issue.

--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation, Library (Lib)
messages: 79590
nosy: MLModel, georg.brandl
severity: normal
status: open
title: trunc(x) erroneously documented as built-in
versions: Python 2.6, Python 3.0, Python 3.1

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com