[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-12-15 Thread James G. sack (jim)

James G. sack (jim) jgs...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:

On my Fedora 11 AMD x86_64 system, it appears the deadlock still occurs 
(up to the limit of my patience, ie: several minutes). If I reduce to say 
3, I can get the test to succeed sometimes.

Observed in: trunk 
  -r 76850 (latest)
  -r 75818 (first occurrence of testThreading in test-bz2.py)

but not -r 75817

~jim

--
nosy: +jgsack

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-12-15 Thread James G. sack (jim)

James G. sack (jim) jgs...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:

IMPORTANT Correction: Please disregard msg96472. 

I was forgetting to do .configure and make, and evidently getting bogus 
failures.

test_bz2 works fine now, ..sorry for the false alarm.

~jim

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-27 Thread Antoine Pitrou

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:

Fixed in r75818 (trunk), r75819 (2.6), r75820 (py3k), r75821 (3.1). Thanks!

--
resolution:  - fixed
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-26 Thread Antoine Pitrou

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:

Here is a patch.

--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15205/bzthreads.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-26 Thread Robert Collins

Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 19:23 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
 Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
 
 Here is a patch.

Looks fine to me assuming that the locking functions can be used outside
the GIL.

On the test side, the case I supplied was low noise for me - I'd
hesitate to do as much compression as you are (50 times more) unless you
saw it spuriously pass a lot - the nature of the deadlock isn't
dependent on races so much as simple scheduling - as long as the seocnd
thread is scheduled before the first thread completes compressing the
deadlock will occur.

-Rob

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-26 Thread Antoine Pitrou

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:

 Looks fine to me assuming that the locking functions can be used outside
 the GIL.

Yes, they can. Actually, even the GIL uses them. :-)

 On the test side, the case I supplied was low noise for me - I'd
 hesitate to do as much compression as you are (50 times more) unless you
 saw it spuriously pass a lot - the nature of the deadlock isn't
 dependent on races so much as simple scheduling - as long as the seocnd
 thread is scheduled before the first thread completes compressing the
 deadlock will occur.

Well, your test case often succeeded here, so I decided on a more
aggressive variation.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-26 Thread Robert Collins

Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:

On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 21:27 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
 Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:

 Well, your test case often succeeded here, so I decided on a more
 aggressive variation.

fair enough, if its needed - its needed :)

-Rob

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-25 Thread Robert Collins

New submission from Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net:

There is a systemic bug in BZ2File where the GIL is released to perform
compression work, and any other thread calling into BZ2File will
deadlock. We noticed in the write method, but inspection of the code
makes it clear that its systemic.

The problem is pretty simple. Say you have two threads and one bz2file
object. One calls write(), the other calls (say) seek(), but it could be
write() or other methods too. Now, its pretty clear that the question
'should these two threads get serialised' could be contentious. So lets
put that aside by saying 'raising an exception or serialising in
arbitrary order would be ok'.

What happens today is:
t1:bz2file.write
   bz2file.lock.acquire
   gil-release
   bz2compression starts
t2:gil-acquired
   bz2file.seek
   bz2file.lock.acquire(wait=1)  - this thread is stuck now, and has
the GIL
t1:bz2compression finishes
   gil.acquire - this thread is stuck now, waiting for the GIL

If any owner of the bz2file object lock will release the GIL, *all*
routines that attempt to lock the bz2file object have to release the GIL
if they can't get the lock - blocking won't work. I'm not familiar
enough with the python threading API to know whether its safe to call
without the GIL. If its not then clearly it can't be used to work with
getting the GIL, and lower layer locks should be used.

--
components: Extension Modules
files: bz2fail.py
messages: 94462
nosy: barry, rbcollins, statik
severity: normal
status: open
title: bz2file deadlock
type: crash
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15196/bz2fail.py

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-25 Thread Antoine Pitrou

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:

Thanks, nice catch.

--
nosy: +pitrou
priority:  - high
stage:  - needs patch
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-25 Thread Robert Collins

Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:

On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 22:00 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
 Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
 
 Thanks, nice catch.

Yeah :).

 versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2

Python 2.5 is also affected - its what we're running on the server that
broke :) 

-Rob

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-25 Thread Antoine Pitrou

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:

 Python 2.5 is also affected - its what we're running on the server that
 broke :) 

Yes, but it doesn't receive any bug fixes anymore -- only security
fixes.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue7205] bz2file deadlock

2009-10-25 Thread Robert Collins

Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net added the comment:

On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 22:27 +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
 Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
 
  Python 2.5 is also affected - its what we're running on the server that
  broke :) 
 
 Yes, but it doesn't receive any bug fixes anymore -- only security
 fixes.

Ok, we'll work around the issue there then ;)

-Rob

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7205
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com