[issue9181] Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python
Charles Solar charlesso...@gmail.com added the comment: Hello again, I got a copy of the latest python from the 2.7 branch, recompiled with CFLAGS=-m64 -O3 and LDFLAGS=-m64 and my extension compiled just fine. So I can verify this bug fixed -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9181] Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Thanks for checking. Closing as fixed. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9181] Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Charles, can you still reproduce your bug now that #9437 has been fixed? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9181] Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- versions: +3rd party ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9181] Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Can you try using CC=cc -m64 OPT=-O3 instead? (replace cc with the proper compiler name, of course) -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9181] Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python
Charles Solar charlesso...@gmail.com added the comment: I just recompiled using your suggested flags and it is now properly linking my extensions. I guess using CFLAGS and LDFLAGS was causing the problem. Is specifying CC the recommended way to build 64 bit python? If so when I guess this issue is not really an issue at all. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9181] Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Is specifying CC the recommended way to build 64 bit python? Currently, yes. LDFLAGS is supposed to work, but it doesn't (open bug: #9437). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9181] Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Thank you for the report. Do you want to work on a patch? The usual process is that someone makes a patch for the active version (branch named py3k, the future 3.2), then the committer backports to stable versions (3.1 and 2.7) and forward-ports to distutils2. See also guidelines at http://www.python.org/dev/patches/ -- nosy: +eric.araujo versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9181] Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python
New submission from Charles Solar charlesso...@gmail.com: On solaris, if you build a 64 bit python and use it to build an extension, it will not properly link the module. Apparently solaris requires the -m64 flag in the linker as well as the compile steps. Python distutils successfully compiles all the object files using -m64, but it fails to link with -m64 causing the entire build to fail if the extension needs a 64 bit library dependency ( will get 'incompatible library' errors from the linker ). To reproduce: build python with CFLAGS=-m64 -O3 LDFLAGS=-m64 build a C extension that depends on a 64 bit library (python setup.py install) I assume that it would work if the C extension does not need a specific 64 bit library as the linker will not go and look for the wrong version of file. So its a very uncommon but annoying bug. ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.1.20100303 Copyright 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. -- assignee: tarek components: Distutils, Distutils2, Extension Modules messages: 109396 nosy: redcomet, tarek priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Solaris extension building does not work with 64 bit python type: compile error versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
