[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-09-07 Thread Éric Araujo

Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:


--
status: closed - open

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-08-10 Thread Éric Araujo

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:

I think disallowing .. is fine, so I’m assigning to myself to make sure I’ll 
take time later to check the docs.

--
assignee: tarek - merwok

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-07-14 Thread Dan OD

New submission from Dan OD dj...@cam.ac.uk:

MANIFEST.in example:

recursive-include ../../this *.that

fails to include files with

warning: no files found matching '*.that' under directory '../../this'

and also

include ../../this *.that

fails with

warning: no files found matching '../../this'

- odd situation I know, but including files in higher directories shouldn't be 
impossible should it? Thanks, Dan

--
assignee: tarek
components: Distutils
messages: 110296
nosy: indiedan, tarek
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: include higher (../../) dirs fails
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.6

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-07-14 Thread Dan OD

Dan OD dj...@cam.ac.uk added the comment:

Thinking about this - maybe including dirs above ./ is bad as it's not obvious 
where they should live in the sdist. 

My alternative would be to create links to ../../this in ./ but then distutils 
creates links rather than hard copies in sdist - is this something that can be 
avoided? 

Thanks again, Dan

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-07-14 Thread Dan OD

Dan OD dj...@cam.ac.uk added the comment:

Sorry for all the noise - this dynamic link thing seems to be fixed in 2.7 
rendering this report 'closed'

Dan

--
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9261] include higher (../../) dirs fails

2010-07-14 Thread Éric Araujo

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:

Can you tell if the docs fail to mention that? If they do, please reopen this 
as a documentation bug (change title, select component Documentation, and set 
status to open). Thank you!

--
nosy: +merwok

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com