[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-03 Thread Steven Bethard

Steven Bethard steven.beth...@gmail.com added the comment:

Yep, I'm fine with you committing this (after adding the prefix=+-/ you 
suggested). I don't have time right now to test the patches, but the code looks 
about right, and the tests ran fine for you, so I'm fine with it.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-03 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:

Committed (with the additional test) to py3k in r83657, and 2.7 in r83676.

--
stage: commit review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann

Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:

Thanks, everyone!

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-02 Thread Doug Hellmann

Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:

Yes, that doc change  is clear.  Thanks!

--
nosy: +ted.turocy

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-02 Thread Catherine Devlin

Catherine Devlin fredv8vi...@liquidid.net added the comment:

Attached a unit test patch corresponding to Ted's patch.  
http://bugs.python.org/file18320/argparse_test.patch

--
nosy: +catherine

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-02 Thread R. David Murray

Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:


--
stage: unit test needed - patch review

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-02 Thread R. David Murray

Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:


Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18298/argparse_char_fix.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-02 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:

The combined patches look good to me, and I tested the tests and patch.  (I 
accidentally deleted the earlier fix patch, sorry).  It would be nice to add 
one more test case that does prefix=+-/ to make sure - is used when it isn't 
first.

Steven, I'd be happy to commit this if you are OK with it, since I was 
mentoring the people who wrote it.

--
nosy: +r.david.murray
stage: patch review - commit review

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Steven Bethard

Steven Bethard steven.beth...@gmail.com added the comment:

Yes, this looks fine, assuming a test is also added.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Doug Hellmann

Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:

I haven't read the existing tests, but I am not seeing the behavior described 
by Ted in msg112258.  If I specify the prefix_chars as '+/' and define a long 
option '//myopt' then using ++myopt on the command line gives an error that the 
option is unrecognized.  I don't know if that's a bug or the desired behavior.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Doug Hellmann

Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:

Oh, I should point out that last comment is describing what I see when using 
the unpatched 2.7 version of the module.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Theodore Turocy

Theodore Turocy drarbi...@gmail.com added the comment:

I was less than clear in what I wrote last night, Doug.  What I mean is that 
the idiom ::foo for a long argument, instead of the more standard-looking 
--foo, appears in the test suite.  This suggests to me that the intended 
behavior for the default help option should be to use a doubled prefix 
character in front of the long-form option.

For instance, if prefix_chars='+' and add_help=True, then the automatically 
provided help arguments will be '+h' and '++help'.

Certainly, if one explicitly adds an option '//myopt', we would not expect 
'::myopt' to also be accepted.  I'm talking here only about the options that 
argparse adds as a convenience.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Doug Hellmann

Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:

I was actually surprised that prefix_chars didn't allow *any* of those 
characters to indicate an option.  For example, a program on Unix might use 
options that start with '-', but also support '/' as a prefix under Windows.  
If that's the intended behavior, that's OK, and maybe the docs can be made more 
specific.

It does, however, open the question of how to pick the prefix to use for 
automatically-generated options.  Maybe the current behavior is best after all, 
so the programmer disabling the '-' prefix character realizes they need to 
handle the help and version options explicitly.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Steven Bethard

Steven Bethard steven.beth...@gmail.com added the comment:

It is intentional that you have to specify both /foo and +foo if you want 
them to be aliases for the same argument. A common use case for prefix_chars is 
to define +x and -x options, which usually mean different things.

As far as the current issue, I believe the current behavior is buggy - an 
argument that you can never use is added to the parser automatically:

 parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(prefix_chars='+')
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File stdin, line 1, in module
  File /Users/bethard/Documents/projects/python/2.X/Lib/argparse.py, line 
1569, in __init__
help=_('show this help message and exit'))
  File /Users/bethard/Documents/projects/python/2.X/Lib/argparse.py, line 
1246, in add_argument
kwargs = self._get_optional_kwargs(*args, **kwargs)
  File /Users/bethard/Documents/projects/python/2.X/Lib/argparse.py, line 
1369, in _get_optional_kwargs
raise ValueError(msg % tup)
ValueError: invalid option string '-h': must start with a character '+'

Yes you could explicitly specify add_help=True, but I think using an 
appropriate prefix character is actually the right behavior.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Doug Hellmann

Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:

Explicitly specifying aliases makes sense, it just wasn't clear that was the 
intent from the existing documentation.  So, I don't think the behavior needs 
to change, but a doc update might help.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Steven Bethard

Steven Bethard steven.beth...@gmail.com added the comment:

A doc patch would also be welcome, but I do think it's a bug that 
ArgumentParser(prefix_chars='+') throws an exception, and I think Ted's patch 
looks fine to me.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Doug Hellmann

Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:

Sorry I'm not being clear: I do like the patch, I think the exception should 
not be raised.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Theodore Turocy

Theodore Turocy drarbi...@gmail.com added the comment:

I'm uploading a new version of my patch which includes a proposed clarification 
to the documentation about the behavior in this case.  Doug, does this make the 
documentation clearer to you?  It is now explicit about the behavior for 
formulating the help option if '-' is not in prefix_chars.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18317/argparse_char_fix+doc.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-08-01 Thread Catherine Devlin

Changes by Catherine Devlin fredv8vi...@liquidid.net:


--
nosy:  -ted.turocy
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18320/argparse_test.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-07-31 Thread Doug Hellmann

Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:

One solution would be to use the first character of prefix_chars when building 
those default options.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-07-31 Thread R. David Murray

Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:


--
nosy: +bethard
stage:  - unit test needed
type:  - behavior
versions: +Python 3.2

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-07-31 Thread Theodore Turocy

Theodore Turocy drarbi...@gmail.com added the comment:

What is the appropriate behavior for long options when '-' is not one of the 
accepted prefix_chars?  All of '-h', '--help', '-v', and '--version' are 
hardcoded in the ctor.  If, for instance, prefix_chars='+', should the long 
options be '++help', or should long options simply be disabled?

Also, for backwards compatibility, to implement Doug Hellmann's suggestion, '-' 
should be used for '-h' and '--help' whenever '-' is listed in prefix_chars 
(so, e.g., prefix_chars='+-' will result in the same behavior as previous 
versions). 

I have a working patch for this but wouldn't mind someone else's thoughts first.

--
nosy: +ted.turocy

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue9444] argparse does not honor prefix_chars when adding default options

2010-07-31 Thread Theodore Turocy

Theodore Turocy drarbi...@gmail.com added the comment:

Looking at the test fixtures that exercise argparse, it appears that the 
intended behavior when '-' is not a prefix_char is to accept a doubling of any 
of the prefix_chars for long arguments.  That is, if '-' is not present in 
prefix_chars but ':' is, then an argument like '::help' would be a valid long 
argument.

I'm attaching a patch which fixes the originally reported problem as follows:

* If '-' is in prefix_chars, then the help and version arguments are '-h', 
'--help', '-v', '--version'
* If '-' is not in prefix_chars, then the first char in prefix_chars is used to 
lead the option, e.g., '+h', '++help', '+v', '++version' if prefix_chars starts 
with '+'.

Catherine Devlin is also sprinting here at PyOhio and will have a test fixture 
separately.

--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18298/argparse_char_fix.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9444
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com