Re: configure failure with bash-3.1 - fixed in SVN, but not in any release

2006-06-22 Thread

Say the word and I can test the 3.2.x and Current branches on FreeBSD
6.1/Apache 2.2.2/Python 2.4.3

-Jeff

On 6/22/06, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Rob Sanderson wrote:
> +1
>
> Seconded.  We have a kludge in our install script to replace sh with
> ksh, but it would be nice to be able to remove this.
>
> Thanks!

Is anyone aware of any issues fixed in trunk that still need to be
backported to 3.2.x? I'll check my notes tonight, but as I recall there
is nothing outstanding so we should be good to go.

One tiny thing that should go in is a fix for the DbmSession file
creation mode, but that is a 30 second job.

Otherwise, I'll roll a 3.2.9 release candidate tarball tonight.

Jim





--
Jeff Hinrichs
Dundee Media & Technology, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
402.320.0821


Re: configure failure with bash-3.1 - fixed in SVN, but not in any release

2006-06-22 Thread Max Bowsher
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Rob Sanderson wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Seconded.  We have a kludge in our install script to replace sh with
>> ksh, but it would be nice to be able to remove this.
>>
>> Thanks!
> 
> Is anyone aware of any issues fixed in trunk that still need to be
> backported to 3.2.x? I'll check my notes tonight, but as I recall there
> is nothing outstanding so we should be good to go.
> 
> One tiny thing that should go in is a fix for the DbmSession file
> creation mode, but that is a 30 second job.
> 
> Otherwise, I'll roll a 3.2.9 release candidate tarball tonight.

Another *strong* motivator for 3.2.9 is Apache 2.2.x support.

Max.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: configure failure with bash-3.1 - fixed in SVN, but not in any release

2006-06-22 Thread Rob Sanderson
+1

Seconded.  We have a kludge in our install script to replace sh with
ksh, but it would be nice to be able to remove this.

Thanks!

Rob

On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 12:29 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Attempting to configure mod_python on a current Debian 'etch' system, or
> any other using bash-3.1, fails, with the shell error:
>   syntax error near unexpected token `('
> 
> This has already been fixed in mod_python SVN for 4 months (r376555,
> MODPYTHON-122), and backported to 3.2.x (r383362), but has not yet made
> it into a release.
> 
> With the growing prevalence of bash-3.1, I'd like to suggest that a
> 3.2.9 release fairly soon would be a good idea. If that's not likely to
> happen, then a bug advisory on the www.modpython.org front-page would be
> a useful interim support.
> 
> Max.
> 
> 
-- 
Dr Robert Sanderson
Dept of Computer Science, University of Liverpool
Home: http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~azaroth/
Cheshire: http://www.cheshire3.org/



configure failure with bash-3.1 - fixed in SVN, but not in any release

2006-06-22 Thread Max Bowsher
Attempting to configure mod_python on a current Debian 'etch' system, or
any other using bash-3.1, fails, with the shell error:
  syntax error near unexpected token `('

This has already been fixed in mod_python SVN for 4 months (r376555,
MODPYTHON-122), and backported to 3.2.x (r383362), but has not yet made
it into a release.

With the growing prevalence of bash-3.1, I'd like to suggest that a
3.2.9 release fairly soon would be a good idea. If that's not likely to
happen, then a bug advisory on the www.modpython.org front-page would be
a useful interim support.

Max.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature