Re: [Python-Dev] Modules for 2.6 inclusion
On 6 Giu, 13:27, Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - setuptools BDFL pronouncement for inclusion in 2.5: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063964.html I'd like to see more interest about this issue since it's a real shame that the current distutils is not even able to solve dependencies and has such a poor integration with Pypi. Having a *valid* distribution tool like setuptools integrated with Python would be the first step to have one of the most important things Python is currently missing finally available: a centralized archive of softwares like Perl CPAN or Ruby Gems. IMHO this should be put on top of the TODO list and I'm honestly surprised it raised so little clamor so far. --- Giampaolo http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Modules for 2.6 inclusion
Guilherme Polo schrieb: I created an issue 1 week ago (http://bugs.python.org/issue2983) suggesting the addition of the ttk module to lib-tk, and to the new tkinter package. Is there any chance to this be accepted for Python 2.6 ? This may be a good thing to have since it can show that Tkinter is not as dead (and dead ugly) as many people think it is. Georg -- Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less. Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] Modules for 2.6 inclusion
Hi, PEP 361 lists the following modules for possible inclusion in 2.6 (next to pyprocessing, which is now accepted): - winerror http://python.org/sf/1505257 (Owner: MAL) This patch has been marked as rejected, so I'll remove the entry from the PEP. - setuptools BDFL pronouncement for inclusion in 2.5: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063964.html PJE's withdrawal from 2.5 for inclusion in 2.6: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064145.html I guess this will be deferred? - ast http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-April/078950.html If there's no objection, I'll go over the interface with Thomas, who's working on AST optimization for 2.7, to make sure the ast interface can stay the same after his branch is merged, write the docs and commit it before beta1. - bdist_deb in distutils package http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060926.html - bdist_egg in distutils package - pure python pgen module (Owner: Guido) Deferral to 2.6: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064528.html There are also several other possible todo items in PEP 361, but they all look as if they are not required to be in before beta1. Georg -- Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less. Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Modules for 2.6 inclusion
On 2008-06-06 13:27, Georg Brandl wrote: Hi, PEP 361 lists the following modules for possible inclusion in 2.6 (next to pyprocessing, which is now accepted): - winerror http://python.org/sf/1505257 (Owner: MAL) This patch has been marked as rejected, so I'll remove the entry from the PEP. Note that the idea is still valid - the implementation of the module should be written in C and the patch only comes with a Python module. If anyone would like to work on a (generated) C module, please have a look at the patch. winerror is meant to provide access to the Windows error codes which are currently not available in Python. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jun 06 2008) Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...http://www.egenix.com/ mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...http://python.egenix.com/ 2008-07-07: EuroPython 2008, Vilnius, Lithuania30 days to go Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,MacOSX for free ! eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Modules for 2.6 inclusion
2008/6/6 Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, PEP 361 lists the following modules for possible inclusion in 2.6 (next to pyprocessing, which is now accepted): - winerror http://python.org/sf/1505257 (Owner: MAL) This patch has been marked as rejected, so I'll remove the entry from the PEP. - setuptools BDFL pronouncement for inclusion in 2.5: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063964.html PJE's withdrawal from 2.5 for inclusion in 2.6: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064145.html I guess this will be deferred? - ast http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-April/078950.html If there's no objection, I'll go over the interface with Thomas, who's working on AST optimization for 2.7, to make sure the ast interface can stay the same after his branch is merged, write the docs and commit it before beta1. - bdist_deb in distutils package http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060926.html - bdist_egg in distutils package - pure python pgen module (Owner: Guido) Deferral to 2.6: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064528.html I created an issue 1 week ago (http://bugs.python.org/issue2983) suggesting the addition of the ttk module to lib-tk, and to the new tkinter package. Is there any chance to this be accepted for Python 2.6 ? There are also several other possible todo items in PEP 361, but they all look as if they are not required to be in before beta1. Georg -- Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less. Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ggpolo%40gmail.com -- -- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Modules for 2.6 inclusion
I created an issue 1 week ago (http://bugs.python.org/issue2983) suggesting the addition of the ttk module to lib-tk, and to the new tkinter package. Is there any chance to this be accepted for Python 2.6 ? Is it complete? In principle, it's for the mentor to decide (who would need to decide before the first beta, of course - afterwards it's for the release manager to decide). Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Modules for 2.6 inclusion
2008/6/6 Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I created an issue 1 week ago (http://bugs.python.org/issue2983) suggesting the addition of the ttk module to lib-tk, and to the new tkinter package. Is there any chance to this be accepted for Python 2.6 ? Is it complete? In principle, it's for the mentor to decide (who would need to decide before the first beta, of course - afterwards it's for the release manager to decide). It is complete Martin. But I will wait for Fredrik's decision then, not sure if it will be soon enough tho. Regards, Martin -- -- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
