Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 394 accepted
Thanks Nick, Ned, and everyone else who worked on implementing this! If any further work on the text of the PEP or on the Makefile patch is needed, please shoot me an email (I have GMail set to archive messages to python-dev unless they explicitly CC me). -Kerrick Staley On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Unfortunately, dinsdale appears to have fallen over again, so I can't > > push the change right now :( > > It appears that was a temporary glitch - the 2.7 change is now in > Mercurial. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > ___ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/mail%40kerrickstaley.com > ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 394 accepted
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Unfortunately, dinsdale appears to have fallen over again, so I can't > push the change right now :( It appears that was a temporary glitch - the 2.7 change is now in Mercurial. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 394 accepted
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > As the PEP czar for PEP 394, I have reviewed it and am happy to say that > I can accept it. Excellent news, thanks! I've pushed an updated version promoting it to Active status, and also incorporating Barry's suggestion of making it explicit that we expect the recommendation to change *eventually*, we just don't know when. > I suppose that Nick will keep track of actually > implementing it in Python 2.7. Indeed I will (as well as the comparatively minor change of converting the 3.x hard link to a symlink as described in the PEP). Unfortunately, dinsdale appears to have fallen over again, so I can't push the change right now :( Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 394 accepted
Congratulations to Kerrick Staley and Nick Coghlan, the authors of the PEP! It's good to hear that the "python", "python2" and "python3" symlinks are now standardized in a PEP. I hope that most Linux distributions will follow this PEP :-) Victor ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] PEP 394 accepted
As the PEP czar for PEP 394, I have reviewed it and am happy to say that I can accept it. I suppose that Nick will keep track of actually implementing it in Python 2.7. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
