I tried using code blocks while writing PEP 551 but they weren’t highlighted on
the python.org rendering.
Personally I think it would be great, provided a good colour scheme is
available (some default schemes are... not always works of art). I’m not sure
who is responsible for that side of things though – presumably it’s just a case
of installing pygments. (FWIW, I’m not keen on going back and modifying old
PEPs, but I won’t stop someone doing it on their own terms.)
Cheers,
Steve
Top-posted from my Windows phone at North Bay Python
From: Wes Turner
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 5:06
To: Python-Dev
Subject: [Python-Dev] PEPs: ``.. code:: python`` or ``::`` (syntaxhighlighting)
In ReStructuredText, this gets syntax highlighted
because of the code directive [1][2][3]:
.. code:: python
import this
def func(*args, **kwargs):
pass
This also gets syntax highlighted as python[3]:
.. code:: python
import this
def func(*args, **kwargs):
pass
This does not::
import this
def func(*args, **kwargs):
pass
Syntax highlighting in Docutils 0.9+ is powered by Pygments.
If Pygments is not installed, or there is a syntax error,
syntax highlighting is absent.
GitHub does show Pygments syntax highlighting
in .. code:: blocks for .rst and .restructuredtext documents [4]
1. Does the python.org PEP view support .. code:: blocks? [5]
2. Syntax highlighting is an advantage for writers, editors, and readers.
3. Should PEPs use .. code:: blocks to provide this advantage?
[1] http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#code
[2] http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/markup/code.html
[3] http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/config.html#confval-highlight_language
[4] https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0557.rst
[5] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0557/
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0458/
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
