Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > In another thread it was suggested that a new buildbot running as root > would be of value. I've spun up a virtual machine running Debian > Wheezy amd64, have installed buildbot from the repository (version > 0.8.6p1), and am ready to have it join the farm. How do I go about > doing this? Is there any interest in this build slave? I haven't heard back from anyone as to where to go from here. ChrisA ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> In another thread it was suggested that a new buildbot running as root >> would be of value. I've spun up a virtual machine running Debian >> Wheezy amd64, have installed buildbot from the repository (version >> 0.8.6p1), and am ready to have it join the farm. How do I go about >> doing this? > > Is there any interest in this build slave? I haven't heard back from > anyone as to where to go from here. Antoine's contacted me off-list and sorted out the details. Bruce the Aussie Buildbot is now in operation. (And yes, the hostname is 'bruce'.) Thanks Antoine! ChrisA ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root
Am 30.12.2013 15:02, schrieb Chris Angelico: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> In another thread it was suggested that a new buildbot running as root >>> would be of value. I've spun up a virtual machine running Debian >>> Wheezy amd64, have installed buildbot from the repository (version >>> 0.8.6p1), and am ready to have it join the farm. How do I go about >>> doing this? >> >> Is there any interest in this build slave? I haven't heard back from >> anyone as to where to go from here. > > Antoine's contacted me off-list and sorted out the details. Bruce the > Aussie Buildbot is now in operation. (And yes, the hostname is > 'bruce'.) > > Thanks Antoine! Thanks guys! The buildbot is missing some vital header files. Please run: # apt-get build-dep python3.3 to install all required dependencies. Christian ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Christian Heimes wrote: > Am 30.12.2013 15:02, schrieb Chris Angelico: >> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: In another thread it was suggested that a new buildbot running as root would be of value. I've spun up a virtual machine running Debian Wheezy amd64, have installed buildbot from the repository (version 0.8.6p1), and am ready to have it join the farm. How do I go about doing this? >>> >>> Is there any interest in this build slave? I haven't heard back from >>> anyone as to where to go from here. >> >> Antoine's contacted me off-list and sorted out the details. Bruce the >> Aussie Buildbot is now in operation. (And yes, the hostname is >> 'bruce'.) >> >> Thanks Antoine! > > Thanks guys! > > The buildbot is missing some vital header files. Please run: > > # apt-get build-dep python3.3 > > to install all required dependencies. It looks like it compiled and ran the tests fine, except for two failures due to a lack of zlib. If zlib is a required dependency, the build process should die without it (or fall back to the version living in Modules/zlib), and needs to be fixed. If it is as optional as it seems to look, then it might be good to keep a buildbot that explicitly doesn't have all (or even any) of the optional dependencies and we should just fix the tests that expect zlib unconditionally. Perhaps not this buildbot, though, since it's the only one running as root. Either way, this buildbot's first and thus far only run has already shown up something that needs to be fixed ;) -- Zach ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Zachary Ware wrote: > and we should just fix the tests that expect zlib unconditionally. Both of which turned out to be trivial; the import of zlib was already guarded in both places, but one skip was checking the wrong name and the other just didn't try to skip, so I've fixed both. -- Zach ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:00:02 -0600, Zachary Ware wrote: > On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Zachary Ware > wrote: > > and we should just fix the tests that expect zlib unconditionally. > > Both of which turned out to be trivial; the import of zlib was already > guarded in both places, but one skip was checking the wrong name and > the other just didn't try to skip, so I've fixed both. We've gone through spates before of fixing the tests that rely on various optional modules (especially zlib). Yeah, having a buildbot configured without all the optional modules would be nice. --David ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Christian Heimes wrote: > The buildbot is missing some vital header files. Please run: > > # apt-get build-dep python3.3 > > to install all required dependencies. Debian Wheezy doesn't package 3.3 but only 3.2, so I grabbed 3.2's build-deps. They're now installed, so the next build should have everything for that. Does anyone happen to know what (if anything) 3.3 needs that 3.2 doesn't? I hit Force Build on the 3.3 one, so hopefully that'll show up. It's busily checking out now. ChrisA ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] Buildbot - "slave lost"
Does Buildbot retain a constant TCP socket to its server? I'm seeing this: http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Debian%20root%203.3/builds/0 """ Results: Retry exception slave lost """ I have two internet connections; one is faster, but tends to drop socket connections after a few hours, and the other is a bit slower but more reliable (as long as the connection doesn't go idle for too long - neither of my upstreams is particularly MUD-friendly). Would it help to set a routing rule to send traffic to python.org:9020 via the connection that won't drop out? ChrisA ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot - "slave lost"
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:24:26 +1100 Chris Angelico wrote: > Does Buildbot retain a constant TCP socket to its server? I'm seeing this: > > http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Debian%20root%203.3/builds/0 I'm quite sure it does. It's necessary to get a real-time view of the test log. > Would it > help to set a routing rule to send traffic to python.org:9020 via the > connection that won't drop out? The only way to know is to try it out :) Regards Antoine. ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot - "slave lost"
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:24:26 +1100 > Chris Angelico wrote: >> Does Buildbot retain a constant TCP socket to its server? I'm seeing this: >> >> http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Debian%20root%203.3/builds/0 > > I'm quite sure it does. It's necessary to get a real-time view of the > test log. > >> Would it >> help to set a routing rule to send traffic to python.org:9020 via the >> connection that won't drop out? > > The only way to know is to try it out :) If that's what it does, then it almost certainly will help. I put all my MUD connections through the other connection. The change is made, I'll trigger another build and see if it works. Thanks for the help! ChrisA ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root
Chris Angelico wrote: >On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Christian Heimes > wrote: >> The buildbot is missing some vital header files. Please run: >> >> # apt-get build-dep python3.3 >> >> to install all required dependencies. > >Debian Wheezy doesn't package 3.3 but only 3.2, so I grabbed 3.2's >build-deps. They're now installed, so the next build should have >everything for that. Does anyone happen to know what (if anything) 3.3 >needs that 3.2 doesn't? You'll need sources for lzma, but I think that should be it. ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Buildbot running Debian amd64 as root
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Zach Ware wrote: >>Debian Wheezy doesn't package 3.3 but only 3.2, so I grabbed 3.2's >>build-deps. They're now installed, so the next build should have >>everything for that. Does anyone happen to know what (if anything) 3.3 >>needs that 3.2 doesn't? > > You'll need sources for lzma, but I think that should be it. Done, lzma-dev installed. Thanks. ChrisA ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] Fwd: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey
So far the results are looking good for 3.x. -- Forwarded message -- From: Dan Stromberg Date: Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:56 PM Subject: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey To: Python List I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x. Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use. I'd be very pleased if you could take 5 or 10 minutes to fill it out. Here's the URL: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N5N5PG2 ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey
[Dan Stromberg] > I keep hearing naysayers, nay saying about Python 3.x. > > Here's a 9 question, multiple choice survey I put together about > Python 2.x use vs Python 3.x use. > > I'd be very pleased if you could take 5 or 10 minutes to fill it out. If you run Python 3 while filling out the survey, like I did, it takes less than 1 minute to complete. This may be surprising, since people usually say Python 3 is slower than Python 2. Those must people who don't fill out surveys ;-) > Here's the URL: > https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N5N5PG2 ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Python 2.x and 3.x usage survey
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote: > So far the results are looking good for 3.x. Python-dev probably is a bit special. //Lennart ___ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
