Thanks for bring attention to these PRs, Brandt! I think the second one
should be particularly uncontroversial, seeing as it's just applying PEP
409 (raise from None) to an existing exception in an argparse unit test to
clean up some unhelpful context clutter in the traceback.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:41 PM Brandt Bucher
wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I've found a handful of trivial PRs from new contributors that have gone
> un-core-reviewed since November. CLAs are signed, tests are passing, and
> I've verified the quality and correctness of each one.
>
> If anybody has a few spare minutes to merge these, I know that it would
> make the authors very happy! :)
>
> Clarify numeric padding behaviour in string formatting:
> - A helpful doc addition (just a few words).
> - https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17036
>
> argparse unittest tracebacks are confusing if an error is raised when not
> expected:
> - This just changes a "raise" to a "raise from None" in the argparse unit
> test machinery.
> - https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17120
>
> Reuse identifier of PREDICT macros as PREDICT_ID:
> - Unifies some shared naming logic in the ceval prediction macros (don't
> worry, it's simple).
> - https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17155/files
>
> Thanks.
>
> Brandt
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/46U2H5U2BAACZZETIWJTAJAGXJSD6MKO/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PAOV4YWV4FJDM7WEOJ2DSMCO4XWHWFWZ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
